Title: A short review of the talks and posters presented
1A (short) review of the talks and posters
presented
- Randall Smith
- JHU NASA/GSFC
2Spectroscopy puts most of the physicsinto
X-ray astrophysics
31895 ApJ, 1, 1
- A. A. Michelson on how to measure spectral lines
emitted in solar prominences
4Synthesize, dont Summarize
- Methods Models
- Accretion (WA, Fe K)
- Stars flares FIPs, O (-type) my!
- Expect the Unexpected
- Future of X-ray Spectroscopy
5What didnt we talk about? (much)
- SNRs (except Dewey) and we clearly need to
re-observe Cas A in 6-7 years - Clusters (except Peterson, Behar) although
absence of cooling flows a blockbuster also
found vturblt30 km/s with a 300 km/s spectrometer!
6What didnt we talk about? (much)
- SNRs (except Dewey) and we clearly need to
re-observe Cas A in 6-7 years - Clusters (except Peterson, Behar) although
absence of cooling flows a blockbuster also
found vturblt30 km/s with a 300 km/s spectrometer! - We need non-dispersive X-ray spectra!
7Methods Models
- Some things are easy. Thank goodness!
- Identifying ion parent of (most) lines
- Fe L shell lines easy to id strengths harder
- RRC features mostly easy to id as well.
- Doppler shifts (if ? known well need lab data!)
- But getting ?v to 3.7 km/s in EX Hya impressive
- Diagnostic line ratios of (strong) lines
- But watch out for LOS differences in models!
8Methods Models
- Others are hard
- Fitting high-resolution broad band spectra
- Measuring a faint continuum
- Determining an Emission or Absorption Measure
Distribution (EMD, AMD) - Creating a model simple enough to calculate but
powerful enough to encapsulate data
9Methods Models
- Are we ready for a satellite which produces
nothing but high-resolution X-ray spectra?
10Methods Models Analyzing high-resolution
spectra
- RGS, HETG, and LETG spectra all have more
resolution elements than this projector! - Methods Which converge? to the right value?
- Photon Clean, including bootstrap
- Line-Based Analysis
- absline
- Gaussian fits after continuum determination
- Adding components until ?2 stops dropping
- Continuum finding find line-free regions,
assumed power-law, spline fit, other method? - What constitutes a good fit?
11Methods Models Analyzing high-resolution
spectra
- RGS, HETG, and LETG spectra all have more
resolution elements than this projector! - Methods Which converge? to the right value?
- Photon Clean, including bootstrap
- Line-Based Analysis
- absline
- Gaussian fits after continuum determination
- Adding components until ?2 stops dropping
- Continuum finding find line-free regions,
assumed power-law, spline fit, other method?
What is a good fit?
12Methods Models Analyzing high-resolution
spectra
- Is the biggest problem
- atomic data? (20-30 correlated errors)
- calibration? (3-15 correlated errors)
- insufficient counts (what metric?)
- methodology? (unknown...)
13Methods Models
- Accessing data getting easier
- BiRD for XMM RGS data
- http//xmm.esac.esa.int/BiRD/
- XATLAS for HETG stellar data
- http//cxc.harvard.edu/XATLAS
- Profit for GUI spectral viewing
- with ATOMDB or XSTAR line ids!
- http//heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/software/profit
- ( CIELO for RGS/Sy1.5, HotGAS for HETGS)
14Accretion Introduction
- Ubiquitous process
- SMBH
- Galactic BH
- X-ray (NS) binaries
- WD (CVs baby Seyferts that become SSS when the
corona collapses...) - Dynamic! (Winds, WA, etc)
- M, Macc, Mwind, Router, Rinner, Spin
- Inclination, Magnetic geometry
.
.
15Accretion Questions, Asked or Answered
- RRCs prove photoionization is the dominant
process in some parts of accretion flows. - Broad Fe K? lines in some AGN are real
- But can we really measure the BH spin?
- Soft X-ray excess coincides with optical NLR
- WA Clumpy or a continuous distribution?
- Can we tell? Are models holding us back, or
calibration, or the data? - Some X-ray components match UV ones (e.g NGC
7469), and they respond to changes in the source
flux.
16Accretion Questions, Asked or Answered
- Hot Absorbers at High Velocities
- Do they exist? Are we missing a giant component
of mass outflow? - Regardless, X-ray observations show this
component dominates UV flows ( gt 90) for nearby
AGN. - NELG spectra not so flat (?? 1.7-1.8, not 1.4),
no disk reflection seen (NGC 2110, 3C445)
17Stars Flares FIPs O (-type) My!
- Static loop models have DEM ? T1.0-1.5
- Observations show DEM ? T4.0
- Which agrees with dynamic loop models
- Flares in X-ray may be in optical or not
- Abundances can change during flare.
- CTTS seem to show accretion as well
- Weak Fe K? seen in HR 9024 flare reflection
model agrees with loop geometry.
18Stars Flares FIPs
- (I)FIP is
- Solved
- Mysterious
- Unexplained
19Stars Flares FIPs
- (I)FIP is
- Solved
- Mysterious
- Unexplained
- Confusing all those not working in stars...
20Hot Stars Controversy in the offing?
- O star lines are broad symmetric(ish)
- Resonant scattering?
- Opacity?
- Or from shocked protons CX, while the electrons
remain cold
21Expect the Unexpected
- Measuring dust or molecular composition
- Ferrous vs ferric iron? With X-rays from the Crab
nebula? Yes! - Main limitation in seeing XAFS is data, both
observational experimental. - Did Alpha Cen A disappear? Nope, just got
coolerside benefit of the LETGS - X-rays can catch SS433s jet hitting a bump
- The hot gas seen at z0 is really in the Galactic
halo.
22Future of X-ray Spectroscopy
- Velocity broadened lines detected with suggestion
of both cold and collisional plasmas in the LLAGN
M81 need resolution, EA! - Detect redshifted iron lines from surface of NS,
determine EOS need ... - Track material falling into AGN via Fe K need...
23Future of X-ray Spectroscopy
- Velocity broadened lines detected with suggestion
of both cold and collisional plasmas in the LLAGN
M81 need resolution, EA! - Detect redshifted iron lines from surface of NS,
determine EOS need ... - Track material falling into AGN via Fe K need...
- Con-X (and CAT) can give resolution, EA
24The Unified AGN Spectrum