A short review of the talks and posters presented - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

A short review of the talks and posters presented

Description:

'Photon Clean,' including bootstrap. Line-Based Analysis. absline ... O star lines are broad & symmetric(ish) Resonant scattering? Opacity? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Randall105
Learn more at: http://cxc.harvard.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A short review of the talks and posters presented


1
A (short) review of the talks and posters
presented
  • Randall Smith
  • JHU NASA/GSFC

2
Spectroscopy puts most of the physicsinto
X-ray astrophysics
  • Claude Canizares

3
1895 ApJ, 1, 1
  • A. A. Michelson on how to measure spectral lines
    emitted in solar prominences

4
Synthesize, dont Summarize
  • Methods Models
  • Accretion (WA, Fe K)
  • Stars flares FIPs, O (-type) my!
  • Expect the Unexpected
  • Future of X-ray Spectroscopy

5
What didnt we talk about? (much)
  • SNRs (except Dewey) and we clearly need to
    re-observe Cas A in 6-7 years
  • Clusters (except Peterson, Behar) although
    absence of cooling flows a blockbuster also
    found vturblt30 km/s with a 300 km/s spectrometer!

6
What didnt we talk about? (much)
  • SNRs (except Dewey) and we clearly need to
    re-observe Cas A in 6-7 years
  • Clusters (except Peterson, Behar) although
    absence of cooling flows a blockbuster also
    found vturblt30 km/s with a 300 km/s spectrometer!
  • We need non-dispersive X-ray spectra!

7
Methods Models
  • Some things are easy. Thank goodness!
  • Identifying ion parent of (most) lines
  • Fe L shell lines easy to id strengths harder
  • RRC features mostly easy to id as well.
  • Doppler shifts (if ? known well need lab data!)
  • But getting ?v to 3.7 km/s in EX Hya impressive
  • Diagnostic line ratios of (strong) lines
  • But watch out for LOS differences in models!

8
Methods Models
  • Others are hard
  • Fitting high-resolution broad band spectra
  • Measuring a faint continuum
  • Determining an Emission or Absorption Measure
    Distribution (EMD, AMD)
  • Creating a model simple enough to calculate but
    powerful enough to encapsulate data

9
Methods Models
  • Are we ready for a satellite which produces
    nothing but high-resolution X-ray spectra?

10
Methods Models Analyzing high-resolution
spectra
  • RGS, HETG, and LETG spectra all have more
    resolution elements than this projector!
  • Methods Which converge? to the right value?
  • Photon Clean, including bootstrap
  • Line-Based Analysis
  • absline
  • Gaussian fits after continuum determination
  • Adding components until ?2 stops dropping
  • Continuum finding find line-free regions,
    assumed power-law, spline fit, other method?
  • What constitutes a good fit?

11
Methods Models Analyzing high-resolution
spectra
  • RGS, HETG, and LETG spectra all have more
    resolution elements than this projector!
  • Methods Which converge? to the right value?
  • Photon Clean, including bootstrap
  • Line-Based Analysis
  • absline
  • Gaussian fits after continuum determination
  • Adding components until ?2 stops dropping
  • Continuum finding find line-free regions,
    assumed power-law, spline fit, other method?

What is a good fit?
12
Methods Models Analyzing high-resolution
spectra
  • Is the biggest problem
  • atomic data? (20-30 correlated errors)
  • calibration? (3-15 correlated errors)
  • insufficient counts (what metric?)
  • methodology? (unknown...)

13
Methods Models
  • Accessing data getting easier
  • BiRD for XMM RGS data
  • http//xmm.esac.esa.int/BiRD/
  • XATLAS for HETG stellar data
  • http//cxc.harvard.edu/XATLAS
  • Profit for GUI spectral viewing
  • with ATOMDB or XSTAR line ids!
  • http//heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/software/profit
  • ( CIELO for RGS/Sy1.5, HotGAS for HETGS)

14
Accretion Introduction
  • Ubiquitous process
  • SMBH
  • Galactic BH
  • X-ray (NS) binaries
  • WD (CVs baby Seyferts that become SSS when the
    corona collapses...)
  • Dynamic! (Winds, WA, etc)
  • M, Macc, Mwind, Router, Rinner, Spin
  • Inclination, Magnetic geometry

.
.
15
Accretion Questions, Asked or Answered
  • RRCs prove photoionization is the dominant
    process in some parts of accretion flows.
  • Broad Fe K? lines in some AGN are real
  • But can we really measure the BH spin?
  • Soft X-ray excess coincides with optical NLR
  • WA Clumpy or a continuous distribution?
  • Can we tell? Are models holding us back, or
    calibration, or the data?
  • Some X-ray components match UV ones (e.g NGC
    7469), and they respond to changes in the source
    flux.

16
Accretion Questions, Asked or Answered
  • Hot Absorbers at High Velocities
  • Do they exist? Are we missing a giant component
    of mass outflow?
  • Regardless, X-ray observations show this
    component dominates UV flows ( gt 90) for nearby
    AGN.
  • NELG spectra not so flat (?? 1.7-1.8, not 1.4),
    no disk reflection seen (NGC 2110, 3C445)

17
Stars Flares FIPs O (-type) My!
  • Static loop models have DEM ? T1.0-1.5
  • Observations show DEM ? T4.0
  • Which agrees with dynamic loop models
  • Flares in X-ray may be in optical or not
  • Abundances can change during flare.
  • CTTS seem to show accretion as well
  • Weak Fe K? seen in HR 9024 flare reflection
    model agrees with loop geometry.

18
Stars Flares FIPs
  • (I)FIP is
  • Solved
  • Mysterious
  • Unexplained

19
Stars Flares FIPs
  • (I)FIP is
  • Solved
  • Mysterious
  • Unexplained
  • Confusing all those not working in stars...

20
Hot Stars Controversy in the offing?
  • O star lines are broad symmetric(ish)
  • Resonant scattering?
  • Opacity?
  • Or from shocked protons CX, while the electrons
    remain cold

21
Expect the Unexpected
  • Measuring dust or molecular composition
  • Ferrous vs ferric iron? With X-rays from the Crab
    nebula? Yes!
  • Main limitation in seeing XAFS is data, both
    observational experimental.
  • Did Alpha Cen A disappear? Nope, just got
    coolerside benefit of the LETGS
  • X-rays can catch SS433s jet hitting a bump
  • The hot gas seen at z0 is really in the Galactic
    halo.

22
Future of X-ray Spectroscopy
  • Velocity broadened lines detected with suggestion
    of both cold and collisional plasmas in the LLAGN
    M81 need resolution, EA!
  • Detect redshifted iron lines from surface of NS,
    determine EOS need ...
  • Track material falling into AGN via Fe K need...

23
Future of X-ray Spectroscopy
  • Velocity broadened lines detected with suggestion
    of both cold and collisional plasmas in the LLAGN
    M81 need resolution, EA!
  • Detect redshifted iron lines from surface of NS,
    determine EOS need ...
  • Track material falling into AGN via Fe K need...
  • Con-X (and CAT) can give resolution, EA

24
The Unified AGN Spectrum
  • NGC 3783!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com