5'1 Introduction and Definitions 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

5'1 Introduction and Definitions 1

Description:

5 Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models ... The model is credible since the manager understands and accepts the model's assumptions. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Yu183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 5'1 Introduction and Definitions 1


1
(No Transcript)
2
5.1 Introduction and Definitions (1)
  • Verification is concerned with determining
    whether the conceptual simulation model (model
    assumptions) has been correctly translated into a
    computer program, i.e., debugging the simulation
    computer program.

3
5.1 Introduction and Definitions(2)

4
Validation
  • A valid model can be used to make decisions.
  • A validation process depends on the complexity of
    the system and on whether a version of the system
    currently exists.
  • A model can only be an approximation.
  • A model is valid for one purpose.
  • The measures of performance used to validate the
    model should include those that the decision
    maker will actually use for evaluating system
    design.

5
5.1 Introduction and Definitions(3)
  • A simulation model and its results have
    credibility if the manager and other project
    personnel accept them as "correct.
  • A credible model is not necessarily valid, and
    vice versa.

6
Validation
Verification
Validation
Establish credibility
Establish credibility
Correct results available
Results used in decision- making process
Simulation program
Conceptual model
System
Make model runs 5,6,7,8,9
Sell results to management 10
Analysis and data 1, 2, 3
Programming 4
Figure 5.1 Timing and relationships of
validation, verification, and establishing
credibility
7
5.2 Guidelines for Determining the Level of Model
Detail (1)
  • Carefully define the specific issues to be
    investigated by the study and the measures of
    performance that will be used for evaluation.
  • The entity moving through the simulation model
    does not always have to be the same as the entity
    moving through the corresponding system.
  • Use subject-matter experts (SMEs) and sensitivity
    analyses.
  • Moderately detailed model.
  • Regular interaction.

8
5.2 Guidelines for Determining the Level of Model
Detail (2)
  • Do not have more detail in the model than is
    necessary to address the issues of interest,
    subject to the proviso that the model must have
    enough detail to be credible.
  • The level of model detail should be consistent
    with the type of data available.
  • In all simulation studies, time and
    money constraints are a major factor in
    determining the amount of model detail.
  • If the number of factors (aspects of interest)
    for the study is large, then use a "coarse"
    simulation model or analytic model to identify
    what factors have a significant impact on system
    performance.

9
5.3 Verification of Simulation Computer Program
  • Tech 1 Write and debug the computer program on
    modules or subprograms.
  • Tech 2 More than one person review the computer
    program (structured walk through of the
    program).
  • Tech 3 Run the simulation under a variety of
    settings of input parameters, and check to see
    that the output is reasonable.
  • Tech 4 "trace", interactive debugger.
  • Tech 5 The model should be run under
    simplifying assumptions for which its true
    characteristics are known or can easily be
    computed.
  • Tech 6 Observe an animation of the simulation
    output.
  • Tech 7 Compute the sample mean and variance for
    each simulation input probability distribution,
    and compare them with the desired mean and
    variance.
  • Tech 8 Use a commercial simulation package to
    reduce the amount of programming required.

10
5.4 Techniques for Increasing Model Validity and
Credibility (1)
  • Collect high-quality information and data on the
    system
  • Conversation with subject matter experts
  • in MS, machine operators, engineers, maintenance
    personnel, schedulers, managers, vendors,
  • Observation of the system
  • Data are not representative of what one really
    wants to model
  • Data are not of the appropriate type or format
  • Data may contain measurement, recording, or
    rounding errors
  • Data may be biased because of self interest
  • Data may be inconsistent
  • Existing theory IID exponential random variables
  • Relevant results from similar simulation study
  • Experience and intuition of the modelers

11
5.4 Techniques for Increasing Model Validity and
Credibility (2)
  • Interact with the manager on a regular basis
  • There may not be a clear idea of the problem to
    be solved at initiation of the study.
  • The managers interest and involvement in the
    study are maintained.
  • The managers knowledge of the system contributes
    to the actual validity of the model
  • The model is credible since the manager
    understands and accepts the models assumptions.
  • Maintain an assumptions document and perform a
    structured walk-through
  • Validate components of the model by using
    quantitative techniques.
  • Validate the output from the overall simulation
    model
  • Animation

12
5.5. Management's Role in the Simulation Process
  • Formulating problem objectives.
  • Directing personnel to provide informationand
    data to the simulation modeler and to attend the
    structured walk-through.
  • Interacting with the simulation modeler on a
    regular basis.
  • Using the simulation results as an aid in the
    decision-making process.

13
5.6 Statistical Procedures for Comparing
Real-world Observations and Simulation Output Data
  • Inspection approach.
  • Confidence-interval approach based on independent
    data.
  • Time-series approach

14
5.6.1 Inspection Approach
  • Statistics sample mean, sample variance, the
    sample correlation function, histograms.
  • dangerous! for sample size 1.
  • Correlated inspection approach

15
Table 5.4 Results for three experiments with the
inspection approach
16
Historical system input data
Historical system input data
Actual system
Simulation model
System output data
Model output data
Compare
Figure 5.2 The correlated inspection approach
17
Table 5.5 Results for the first 10 of 500
experiments with the correlated and basic
Inspection approaches, and a summary for all 500
18
5.6.2 Confidence-Interval Approach based on
Independent Data
  • Condition it is possible to collect a
    potentially large amount of data for both the
    model and the system.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com