Title: A Horizontal Slice Through Medical Informatics
1A Horizontal Slice Through Medical Informatics
- Mgt 459d Digital Health Telemedicine
- Class 2
- David Dilts
2Questions Focus
- Questions of the Day
- What technologies are available to follow a
patient through the system? What are their
benefits and limitations? - FocusĀ
- Clinical Pathways / Care paths
3Textbook Chapters
- Ch. 7 Protocol-based decisions support
evidence-based medicine - Ch. 8 Designing and applying protocols
- Ch. 9 Computer-based protocol systems in
healthcare
4Systems
- Are models
- Have behavior
- Are embedded in an environment
- Have structure
- Have function
- May have a purpose
- May be arbitrary
5Generic Model of How to Model
Real World
Artifact
Model of The World
Artifact Model
6Evaluation Framework
Problem Domain
IV Setting Validity
I Conceptual Validity
Replication
Literature
Conceptual Model
Problem Setting
Field Tests Data Analysis
Development
III Operational Validity
II Verification
Created System
7Levels of Knowledge
- Data facts, raw values, little context
- 103 degrees
- Information data with context
- The patients temperature is 103 degrees
- Knowledge information with relationships
- If a patient is 3 years old, has a temperature
of 103 degrees, and the sniffles, she most likely
has the flu - Wisdom knowing what to do with knowledge
- Having the flu does not mean a patient needs
antibiotics. - Note a major problem with most systems they
deal with data, not information
8Electronic Medical Record
- The basic of all medical informatics
- Generally only data with a data dictionary
- Generally contains no knowledge, or wisdom
- Generally designed functionally instead of
customer-centric - Owned by the care provider, not the customer
9Ideas and trends in medical records (Dwyer, 1999)
- The future scenario Clinicians could
automatically - Choose a practice guideline
- Review all patient records for major quality of
care issues - Screen all patients for drug interactions
- Scan articles relevant to the patient condition
- Make patient record available for clinical
research - Note all clinician based!
10Protocol-based Critical Pathways
- a.k.a., clinical practice guidelines, care maps,
practice parameters, care pathways, care paths,
etc. - a formal, documented process for treating a
condition - a set of standards of practice
- are management plans that display goals for
patients and provide the corresponding ideal
sequence and timing of staff actions to achieve
those goals for optimal efficiency (Pearson,
1995, p. 941.) - systematically developed statements to assist
practitioner and patient decisions about
appropriate health care for specific clinical
circumstances. (Institute of Medicine)
11History of Critical Pathways
- Developed initially from CPM PERT
- Then flowcharting methods
- Then Critical Pathways, but for nursing care
- Transitioned into Hospitals
- Drivers DRGs and HMOs
- Today, 80 of US hospitals use critical pathways
of some type
12Goals of Critical Pathways
- Best practice versus wide-practice styles
- Defining standards of hospital duration (DRG
issue) - Examine interrelationships among steps (i.e.,
BPR) - Provide a game plan for all involved parties
- Collect data
- Decrease documentation burdens
- Improve patient satisfaction
13Why use Critical Pathways?
- Researchfind out what actually works
- Start of modern medicine and epideminology
(medical accounting) - Responsibility
- Identification of who is responsible for what
- What to do in what case
- Reduce inappropriate variation in clinical
practice patterns - Increase consistency, and hence quality
- Reduce cost of care
- Legal Liability Reduction (?)
14Elements of Clinical Pathway Structure
- Entry criterion
- Functional flows
- Flowcharts The flow of work
- Decision trees Yes/no decisions
- Petri Nets State transition diagrams
- Discuss specific decisions and tests required at
different steps - Results oriented
15Design Principles
- Use a multidisciplinary approach
- i.e., use all major stakeholders (including
patients) - Make all assumptions explicit
- Do not be too specific (Figure 8.2, p. 111)
- Reflect the skill level knowledge of the user
- Protocols must be constantly reviewed
16When not to use Pathways
- When clear goals cannot be isolated
- When probabilities or utilities cannot be
evaluated - When there is ill-defined results
- When decisions are not separable
- When there is high variance in unmeasurable
aspects of the input
17Passive versus Active Protocols
- Passive
- Only a source of information, not intrinsically
part of the care process - A set of helpful guidelines
- Active
- Shape the delivery of care
- Explicit rules and guidelines of care
18Promises Pitfalls of e-medical records (Ann
Intern Med 1998)
- Define appropriate use
- Ensure security confidentiality
- Guide patients in effectiveness of use
- Proactively assess medico-legal liability
- Enable for use by multilingual and multicultural
populations
19Measurement Problems
- It is easier to measure costs than to measure
quality - How to measure input?
- Patient satisfaction / Quality care
20Legal Issues
- Physician Licensure
- Physicians are licensed, not HMOs
- Economic credentialing
- Cannot use practice guidelines for physician
credentialing (e.g., you cannot fire a physician
for not following a critical pathway) - Malpractice
- Follow the pathway and get sued for poor quality
(standards of care) OR - Dont follow the pathway and get sued for poor
quality!
21Ideas Trends in Medical Informatics (Dwyer 1999)
- Barriers to progress
- Quality of information on the net
- EBM research has shown that practitioners have
only 30 minutes per week to review evidence - Security confidentially
- Future possibilities
- Reduction in medical errors
- Focus on the clinical encounter
22Questions about Critical Pathways (Pearson, 1995)
- How to deal with variances from the path
- Autonomy versus standardization
- Malpractice Risk is not followed
- Research and education versus individualized care
- Effectiveness Measurement
23Questions about critical pathways (Pearson, 1999)
- Are they any better than other practices?
- Not necessarily (Holmboe 1999 study that compared
to other CI initiatives) - Medicines response, Holmboe et. al., 1999 was
- Only a single medical condition
- Unique to the hospitals involved
- Not a randomized study
24Ideas Trends in Medical Informatics (Dwyer 1999)
- Standardization
- integrate these data seamlessly
- HL7
- Unified Medical Language System (a code of codes)
- Patient-Centered Health Care
- Internet-based care
- Promises Pitfalls
- Barriers to progress
- Future possibilities
25The Major Questions
- Are critical pathways an effective means to
reduce the costs of health care, improve quality,
and reduce malpractice liability? - OR
- Are they just being used to appease powerful
interests-with limited promise perhaps
potential negative cost, quality, and liability
implications?
26Two Views
- most observers characterize available evidence
as inconclusive at best (Allen et al., 1997) - Versus
- Proper skepticism does not mean that we should
allow cynicism to block the search for ways to
bring evidence into medicine, to reduce
unnecessary variation in care, and to improve the
use of effective treatments. Whether critical
pathways should have a prominent role in these
efforts is unknown, but while that is being
determined, such programs will remain in place
( Pearson, 1999) - guidelines are not working in the physicians
favorthey are more often used against physicians
than in their defense. (Brennan, 1994, quoted in
Pearson, 1999)