RELIABILTY AND OF EDDY CURRENT TESTING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

RELIABILTY AND OF EDDY CURRENT TESTING

Description:

INSPECTION OF HEAT EXCHANGER TUBING. TUBING INSPECTION METHODS. CONVENTIONAL ECT ... ECT vs IRIS. Typical Defects in Heat Exchanger Tubes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:616
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: vikramb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RELIABILTY AND OF EDDY CURRENT TESTING


1
RELIABILTY AND OF EDDY CURRENT TESTING
  • ANMOL BIRRING
  • NDE ASSOCIATES, INC
  • WWW.NDE.COM

2
MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
  • PERFORMING ECT FOR OVER 15 YEARS
  • WORKED IN SEVERAL PETROCHEMICAL AND FOSSIL PLANTS
  • CONDUCTED ECT TRAINING IN USA, KOREA, JAPAN,
    MEXICO, TAIWAN

3
PAPER ADDRESSES
  • INSPECTION IN PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS
  • INSPECTION OF HEAT EXCHANGER TUBING

4
TUBING INSPECTION METHODS
5
CONVENTIONAL ECTNON-FERROMAGNETIC TUBING
  • STARTED IN 1950s
  • FIRST MAJOR APPLICATIONS BY NAVY NUCLEAR
  • STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS IN THE 1960s

6
ECT INSPECTION
7
DEFECT TYPES
8
OD CRACK
9
ECT STRIP CHART
10
CALIBRATION
11
ECT INSPECTION
12
ID PITTING BRASS TUBING
13
FINAL RESULTS
14
DEFINITION - RELIABILTY
  • POD PROBABABILTY OF DETECTION. MUST BE HIGH
  • POFA PROBABILTY OF FALSE ALARMS. MUST BE LOW
  • RELIABILTY POD x (1-POFA). MUST BE HIGH
  • ACCURACY SIZING ERRORS

15
EPRI AND SHELL TESTS ON RELIABILTY
  • POD CAN VARY 50 TO 95
  • POFA CAN VARY 0 TO 20
  • RELIABILTY POD x (1-POFA) CAN VARY 40 TO 90
  • TECHNICIAN DEPENDENT
  • NOT EQUIPMENT DEPENDENT

16
PETROCHEMICAL VS. NUCLEAR
  • NUCLEAR - WELL DEFINED MATERIALS
  • NUCLEAR WELL DEFINED DAMAGE MECHANISMS
  • PETROCHEMICAL RANGE OF MATERIALS AND DAMAGE
    MECHANISMS WE HAVE OVER 150 CAL TUBES AND WE
    STILL ADD

17
MAJOR PROBLEM WITH ECT INSPECTIONS
  • LARGE VARIATION AMONG TECHNICIANS IN RELIABILTY
    AND ACCURACY

18
WHAT CAUSES SUCH VARIATIONS
  • EDUCATION ?
  • TRAINING ?
  • TESTING ?
  • CERTIFICATION ?
  • APTITUDE ?

19
CERTIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
  • LEVEL II AND III DO NOT MEAN ANYTHING IN TUBE
    TESTING
  • PAST EXPERIENCE MAY NOT BE OF MUCH SIGNIFICANCE

20
EDUCATIONHOW MUCH ?
  • MUST HAVE HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION
  • BASIC MATH SKILLS MUST BE GOOD
  • COMPUTER SKILLS ARE A NECESSITY
  • Note I have run into students who do not know
    what is 20 of 80 - This is the problem of our
    high school students

21
TRAINING
  • GENERAL ECT TRAINING - OK
  • SPECIFIC ECT TRAINING
  • PRACTICAL ECT TRAINING

22
GENERAL TRAINING
  • MUST UNDERSTAND IMPEDANCE PLANE

23
SPECIFIC TRAININGTECHNIQUE SELECTION
  • CONVENTIONAL ECT
  • REMOTE FIELD ECT
  • IRIS
  • MFL
  • TECHNIQUES AND LIMITATIONS

24
SPECIFIC TRAINING
  • SELECTION OF PROBE FREQUENCY AND SIZE
  • CALIBRATION TUBE MUST BE SAME MATERIAL AND SIZE
  • HOW TO VERIFY TUBE MATERAIL
  • DETERMING ECT FREQUENCY WITHOUT KNOWING MATERIAL
    CONDUCTIVITY

25
VERIFY TUBE MATERIAL
26
PRACTICAL ECT TRAININGMUST ADDRESS REAL WORLD
PROBLEMS
  • MATERIALS
  • DEFECT TYPES
  • METALLIC DEPOSITS

27
MATERIALS
  • STAINLESS STEEL, HASTELLOY, INCONEL
  • AD. BRASS, Cu-Ni Alloys MOST DIFFICULT
  • TITANIUM
  • ALLOY 2205

28
DEFECT TYPES
  • PITTING
  • CRACKING AXIAL AND CIRC
  • WALL LOSS
  • DAMAGE AT SUPPORTS

29
METALLIC DEPOSITSWEAKEST AREA
  • METALLIC DEPOSITS IN TUBES CAN JUST LOOK LIKE
    DEFECT SIGNALS
  • THIS ARE IS RARELY ADDRESSED IN ANY TRAINING
  • MAJOR CAUSE OF POFA

30
METALLIC DEPOSITS
31
ID GROOVE
32
METALLIC DEPOSITS CAN LOOK LIKE ID DEFECTS
33
SIZNG ACCURACY
  • ASME CAL CURVE IS NOT ACCURATE
  • ECT PHASE DEPENDS BOTH ON DEFECT DEPTH AND
    DIAMETER

34
CURRENT PRACTICAL TRAINING
  • BASICALLY THERE IS MINIMAL PRACTICAL TRAINING
  • LIMITED TO ASME CAL TUBES

35
PRACTICAL TRAINING
  • MUST BE ON ACTUAL DATA
  • MULTIPLE ID PITS
  • DEFECTS UNDER SUPPORTS
  • METALLIC DEPOSITS
  • RANGE OF MATERIALS

36
TRAINING ON TEST BUNDLESNOT EFFECTIVE
  • THIS APPROACH IS VERY LIMITED
  • LIMITED SAMPLES
  • LIMITED DEFECTS

37
WHAT ABOUT TESTS ON BUNDLES ?LIMITED TESTS
  • MOST OF THEM HAVE MACHINED FLAWS
  • MOST OF THEM TEST CAPABILTY TO TEST UNDER
    SUPPORTS

38
WHAT IS NEEDED ?
  • MORE INTENSE PRACTICAL TRAINING ON ACTUAL DATA
    OVER 10,000 SIGNALS
  • TESTING ON ACTUAL TUBE DATA

39
PRACTICAL TEST ON ACTUAL DATA20 SIGNALS EACH
  • MULTIPLE ID DEFECTS IN BRASS
  • ID DEFECTS IN BRASS
  • OD DEFECTS IN BRASS
  • WEAR AT SUPPORTS
  • CRACKS AT SUPPORTS
  • METALLIC DEPOSITS
  • VIBRATION DAMAGE

40
CONCLUSIONS
  • ECT IN PETRMOCHEMICAL PLANTS IS CHALLENGING
  • RANGE OF MATERIALS
  • VARIETY OF DAMAGE MECHANISMS
  • PRACTICAL TRAINING AND TESTING THAT ADDRESSS
    THESE ISSUES IS THEREFORE REQUIRED

41
FINALLY !!
  • IT BOILS DOWN TO THE ATITUDE OF THE INSPECTOR
  • WILLINGNESS TO LEARN
  • SELF MOTIVATON
  • INTEGRITY

42
FOR MORE INFORMATIONWWW.NDE.COM
  • NDE 01-01  Detection of MIC Damage in U-Bends
  • NDE 02-01  Detection of Axial ODSCC under
    supports
  • NDE 03-01  Why ECT Technicians Make False Calls ?
  • NDE 03-02 Detection of Cracks in Tubesheet
    Expansion Roll
  • ECT vs IRIS
  • Typical Defects in Heat Exchanger Tubes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com