Gas To Chemicals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Gas To Chemicals

Description:

Waxes/Lube Oil. Power. Fuel Cells. Chemicals (MTBE, Acetic Acid, Formaldehyde) Diesel/Gasoline ... 1970 Operation of a 100 Tubes-Reactor Demonstration Unit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1621
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: tes845
Category:
Tags: chemicals | gas | lube | tube

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gas To Chemicals


1


Gas To Chemicals New Delhi, September 18-21,
2002 Jens Wagner
Technologically Advanced Natural Gas
Monetization Opportunities for Chemicals
Petrochemicals
2
Agenda
  • Gas To Chemicals - Drivers
  • MegaSyn-Technology
  • MegaMethanol-Technology
  • Gas-Based Petrochemistry
  • Gas-Based Refinery

3
Vision Lurgi Oel Gas Chemie
We are the leading engineering contractor in the
field of oil/gas/chemicals, customer oriented
and focussed on proprietary technologies and
exclusive licenses for growth markets like
gas-to-chemicals, and their global, professional
realisation from a single source.
4
Driver I
Natural Gas Reserves-To-Production Ratio
of global reserves
7,1 7,8 34,6 38,1 3,0 4,3 5,0
Source Energy Information Administration (EAI)
International Natural Gas Information 14 Feb
2001, http//www.eia.doe.gov
5
3,700 billion ft³ of natural gas are flared per
year
Driver II
World production of ammonia
4x World production of methanol
Source Energy Information Administration (EIA)
International Natural Gas Information 14 Feb
2001, http//www.eia.doe.gov
6
Driver III
7
Driver III
Source CMAI
8
Driver IV
  • For years Lurgi Oel Gas Chemie GmbH is one of
    the mayor players in the field of Syngas
    Generation and Synthesis Technologies. Based on
    our
  • huge experience,
  • expertise, and
  • success
  • the Gas-to-Chemicals (GTC) route is a
    consequent further development and
    application of our core technologies
    and know-how.

Mossgas Fischer-Tropsch Plant
9
Lurgi Mega Concept -
Basis of a gas-based Chemicals- and Refinery
Industry
Acetic Acid
Formaldehyd
Stranded Gas
MTBE
SYNGAS CO H2
Methanol
Diesel- Additives
FT- Fischer Tropsch Products
Fuel
Hydrogen
Olefins
DME
Clean Fuels, Lubricants, ? -Olefins
Ammonia
Polypropylene Acrylonitril
Polyethylene Ethylene-Glycol ?-Olefins
Fuel Cell, Green Fuels
Diesel
Energy- Production
Urea
Liquids
Production of many high-value products
10
How do You want to produce Your Syngas?
ASU
ASU

5 x 1000 Tubes
1.5 Mio Nm³/h 560 Mio SCF/d Syngas
1.5 Mio Nm³/h 560 Mio SCF/d Syngas
1.5 Mio Nm³/h 560 Mio SCF/d Syngas
11
Gas to Syngas (MegaSynTM) -
Investment Cost Comparison
relativecost
106 Nm3/h syngas
12
Autothermal Reformer
Process Characteristics
q low S/C ratio ? 1.5 - 0.5 mol/mol ? high CO
selectivity ? low CO2 emission q outlet
temperature ? 900 - 1050 C ? low methane
slip ? close approach to equilibrium q pressure
40 bar commercially proven (up to 70 bar
possible) q single train capacity 500,000 m3
syngas /hr under construction
13
Combined Reformer, Mossgas, South Africa
14
Gas to Chemicals Processing Routes
Diesel Gasoline LPG Fuel Gas Waxes/Lube
Oil Power Fuel Cells Chemicals (MTBE, Acetic
Acid, Formaldehyde) Diesel/Gasoline Propylene/Poly
propylene Acrylic Acid/Acrylates Ethylene/Propylen
e Fuel (DME) Hydrogen
Fischer Tropsch Synthesis
Upgrading
MtPower
MegaSyn
Natural Gas / Associated Gas
MtSynfuels
Mega-Methanol
MTP
Acrylic Acid
MTO
MTD
MTH
Megammonia
Ammonia/Urea/Fertilizer
15
Lurgis LP-Methanol Technology Milestones
  • 1969 First LP-Methanol Catalyst Test
  • 1970 Cooperation with Süd-Chemie for Catalyst
    Manufacturer
  • 1970 Operation of a 100 Tubes-Reactor
    Demonstration Unit
  • 1972 First 3 LP-Methanol Plants in Operation
  • 1997 MegaMethanolTM Concept Published
  • 2001 37 LP-Methanol Plants including two awarded
    contracts for MegaMethanolTM plants

16
Simplified Diagram of Lurgis MegaMethanol
Technology
  • improved gasification
  • high energy efficiency for MeOH synthesis
  • low investment costs
  • large single-train capacity
  • methanol production cost of less than 50 /t !

17
Methanol Technology Competitive Situation
Market Share
1969 - 1992
1992 - 2001
Lurgi 27
Lurgi 55
MGC, Other 12
MGC, Other 20
ICI 61
ICI 25
18
Dimethyl Ether (DME) -Alternative to
Conventional Diesel Fuel
  • Excellent transportation fuel (better diesel)
  • Very low emission levels
  • Clean and efficient power generation
  • Similar properties as LPG (storage, transport)

DME Energy Carrier of the Future!(see
www.aboutdme.org)
19
DME Production by Methanol Dehydration
20
Lurgi DME Process Features
  • Reactor Adiabatic Fixed Bed Reactor
  • High Conversion Rate
  • Purity According to Requirement
  • Highly efficient Heat Integration Systems,
  • resulting in low Utility Requirement
  • Low Utility Consumption
  • Zero Emission

21
Lurgi DME - Economics
MegaMethanol Dehydration Plant DME
production 5000 t/d Natural gas
demand 42.9 MMBtu/tDME 28.5 MMBtu/tMeOH Total
fixed cost (EPC) 415 MMUS Production
Cost 93.0 US/tDME 3.4 /MMBtu Diesel fuel
(for comparison) 4.8 - 6.1 /MMBtu based on NG
price 0.5 US/MMBtu and both, depreciation
ROI 10 of total fixed cost
22
MTP - Simplified Process Flow Diagram
23
MTP - Technical Highlights
  • Propylene production only
  • tailor-made, proprietary zeolite catalyst
  • Fixed-bed reactors
  • Low coking of catalyst results in low number of
    regeneration cycles
  • Discontinuous in-situ regeneration at reaction
    temperature
  • Proven process elements
  • Catalyst commercially available

24
MTP Technology Status
  • PROCESS
  • More than 4000 operating hours of pilot plant in
    Frankfurt
  • Demo unit in Norway started 01/ 2002, today about
    3000 operating hours, more than 8000 scheduled
  • Optimisation of process flow sheet for commercial
    plant finished
  • CATALYST
  • catalyst development completed by catalyst
    supplier
  • catalyst is commercially manufactured and
    available

25
MTP Economics I
Case Study B, Blockflow Diagram
1.7 Mio t/aMethanol
520 000 t/aPropylene
12.3 Mio Nm³/dSyngas
3.8 Mio Nm³/d
Poly-propylenePlant
SyngasPlant
Propylene Plant (MTP)
Methanol Plant
NaturalGas
143 000 t/aGasoline
520 000 t/aPolypropylene
26
MTP Economics II
Production Cost, Case Study B Integrated
MegaMeOH/MTP/PP Complex
27
MTP Economics III
ROI, Case Study B Integrated MegaMeOH / MTP / PP
Complex
28
Gas-based Petrochemistry
MeOH-Plant
PP-Plant
Natural GasMethane
SyngasCO H2
Methanol
Propylene
MTP Plant
Polypropylene
Propylene
Propylene
Oxoalcohol-Plant
Acrylic Acid
Acrylic AcidPlant
Acrylic Acid
Acrylic Acid
2-EHOH
BuOH
2-EHOH Acryl. Plant
Bu-Acryl. Plant
2EHAC
BuAc
Butylacrylate
2-Ethylhexylacrylate
29
Gas Refinery via Methanol - Lurgis MtSynfuel
(MTS)
30
Comparison Lurgi MTS Route - FT Synthesis I

31
Comparison Lurgi MTS Route - FT Synthesis II
Cost of Production Estimate1)
  • Plant Location Middle East
  • Plant Capacity 50,000 barrels per day products
  • Natural Gas Price 0.50 US / MMBtu
  • Depreciation 10 for ISBL / 5 for OSBL
  • Return on Investment 10
  • Total Capital Investment Includes Total Plant
    Capital (ISBLOSBL) plus 20 for Other
    Project Cost, year 2000
  • Cost of Production Includes depreciation and 10
    ROI
  • Product Market Prices Year 2000, adjusted to
    shipping costs from Middle East and
    applicable tariffs for the considered regions
  • 1) Basis Chem Systems, 2001

32
Comparison Lurgi MTS Route - FT Synthesis
IIICost of Production Estimate

33
Conclusions - Future Perspectives
  • The challenge of abundant NG is answered.
  • MegaSyn and MegaMethanol - Lurgis Mega
    Concept opens
  • new routes of gas
    monetisation
  • Dimethyl ether (DME) can be produced at
    attractive coststo become an economical fuel
  • Propylene is a high-demand, high value product.
    It can be pro-duced cheaper than by conventional
    processes
  • The economics of MtSynfuels are comparable to FT
    routes
  • A gas-based petrochemistry/refinery is
    developed by Lurgi

34
Back-up slides
35
Latest Methanol Project References
  • Methanex, USA 1700 mtpd 1992
  • Statoil, Norway 2400 mtpd 1992
  • CINOPEC, China 340 mtpd 1993
  • KMI, Indonesia 2000 mtpd 1994
  • NPC, Iran 2000 mtpd 1995
  • Sastech, RSA 400 mtpd 1996
  • Titan, Trinidad 2500 mtpd 1997
  • PIC, Kuwait 2000 mtpd 1998
  • YPF, Argentina 1200 mtpd 1999
  • Atlas, Trinidad 5000 mtpd 1999
  • NPC, 4th Methanol, Iran 5000 mtpd 2000

36
Two-Step Methanol Synthesis
Water Cooled Reactor
Gas Cooled Reactor
  • Operation at the Optimum Reaction Route
  • High Equilibrium Driving Force
  • High Conversion Rate
  • Elimination of Reactor Feed Preheater
  • Elimination of Catalyst Poisoning
  • Simple and Exact Reaction Control
  • Quasi Isothermal Operation
  • High Methanol Yield
  • High Reliability
  • High Energy Efficiency

37
Dimethyl Ether (DME) -Quality Aspects of Diesel
Fuel
  • Ignition
  • Characteristics of the Components
  • Cetane Number
  • Density, Effect on Engine Performance
  • Exhaust Gas Emissions, Sulfur, Particulates, Nox
  • Viscosity, narrow Limits
  • Cold Flow Properties, substitutes Kerosene

38
Properties of DME and other Fuel
Name
DME
Propane
Methane
Methanol
Diesel
Chemical formula
CH
OCH
C
H
CH
CH
OH
3
3
3
8
4
3
Molecular
weight
46.07
44.1
16.04
32.04
Boiling point at 0.1MPa, C
-24.8
-42.1
-161.5
64.7
150-370
-
Liquid density, kg/m³ (20C)
666
501
792

Relative density (gaseous, air1)
1.59
1.52
0.55
-
-
Vapor pressure, MPa (20C)
0.51
0.85
-
-
-
Explosive limits (
vol in air)
3-17
2.1-9.4
5-15
5.5-44
0.6-6.5
Cetane number
55-60
5
0
5
40-55
42.5
19.9
Net calorific value (MJ/kg)
28.84
46.3
50
39
DME Synthesis Alternatives
40
Lurgi DME - Process
41
Synfuels, Mossel Bay, RSA
42
MTP - Product Slate
43
MTP RD Development Strategy
DME pre- reactors
Three-Stage PDU (Pilot Plant)
  • tests for catalyst optimization
  • optimization of reaction conditions in 1st, 2nd
    and 3rd stage
  • testing optimization of simulated recycle
    streams
  • optimization of steam dilution
  • test of regeneration conditions
  • optimization of DME pre-reactor

1st stage
3rd stage
2nd stage
44
MTP RD - Objective of Demo Unit
  • Demo Unit is the next step of scale-up allowing
    final scale-up to industrial size in one last
    step
  • Compare Demo Unit results with Pilot Plant
    (successful)
  • confirm operating conditions and process
    performance in long time operation
  • test of catalyst life, deactivation and
    regeneration, demonstrate catalyst lifetime
    greater than 1 year
  • test influence of real hydrocarbon recycle on
    product yield and catalyst activity

Demo Plant, Norway, 2002
45
MTP - Process Design of Commercial Plant
46
MTP Economics
47
MTP Reactor System
Fixed-Bed
Fluidised-Bed
  • propylene production only
  • more complicated set-up to control reaction
    temperature
  • low risk of scale-up
  • low coking tendency of catalyst
  • discontinuous in-situ regeneration at reaction
    temperature (no stress on the catalyst)
  • defined residence time for maximum selectivity
  • ethylene/propylene co-production
  • good temperature control
  • complicated multi-step scale-up
  • high coking tendency of catalyst
  • continuous regeneration at elevated temperatures
    oxygen breakthrough into process possible
  • broad residence time distribution

48
Lurgis FT Experience I
  • Commercialisation of ARGE-synthesis in 1952
  • location Sasolburg / South Africa
  • start up 1955
  • no. of reactors 5
  • All original reactors still in operation
    todayextension of capacity in 1987 ( 1 reactor)
  • Modern FT Reactor Technology
  • Slurry phase reactor (by far preferred)
  • Tubular reactor
  • Fluidised bed reactor
  • Lurgi has commercial experience in all these
    reactor technologies

49
Lurgis FT Experience II
  • Lurgi designed the syngas production unitsof all
    FT-plants currently in commercial operation
  • Sasol/Secunda (coal gasification)
  • Mossgas (combined reforming of NG)
  • SMDS/Bintulu (partial oxidation of NG)

Today, Lurgi MegaSyn is available for FT
Synthesesas well as for MtSynfuel Lurgis
route through methanol to transportation fuels
50
Gas-based Petrochemistry
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com