Special Topics in Computer Science Computational Modeling for SnakeBased Robots Introduction to Asse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Special Topics in Computer Science Computational Modeling for SnakeBased Robots Introduction to Asse

Description:

Snake-Based Robots. Introduction to. Assembly Modeling. Week ... More Joint Types. Many higher order joint types can be represented by combining 1-DOF joints by ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: willia69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Special Topics in Computer Science Computational Modeling for SnakeBased Robots Introduction to Asse


1
Special Topics in Computer ScienceComputational
Modeling for Snake-Based RobotsIntroduction to
Assembly ModelingWeek 2, Lecture 1
  • William Regli
  • Geometric and Intelligent Computing Laboratory
  • Department of Computer Science
  • Drexel University
  • http//gicl.cs.drexel.edu

2
Building Multidisciplinary Model
  • Class Goal create multidisciplinary engineering
    models
  • Challenge Learn enough about each discipline to
    create integrated models!
  • Last week modeling parts
  • Today putting parts together!
  • i.e. creating assemblies

3
Where we stand
  • You have a physical design you prototyped with
    Legos
  • You have your individual 3D models for the
    elements of the design
  • How to put them together?

4
Transformations to Change Coordinate Systems
  • Issue the world has many different relative
    frames of reference
  • How do we transform among them?
  • Example CAD Assemblies Animation Models

5
(No Transcript)
6
Example A Scanner Head Assembly
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Goal of Assembly Modeling
  • Products are rarely individual parts
  • Typically, products are designed top down as
    assembly models
  • For this class, we are interested in the data
    structures for assemblies

11
Assembly Modeling
  • Parts can be defined with mating features on
    them.
  • Features can be mated directly.
  • An assembly database builds up automatically.
  • Assembly knowledge can be accessed.
  • Information in assembly models
  • What parts mate to what parts
  • What features define the mates and where they are
    on the parts
  • What interfaces must be controlled, plus a formal
    way of describing them
  • Constraints and rule-checking
  • about assembly in the small
  • about assembly intent in terms of features
  • about assembly in the large, including alternate
    parts
  • It is a completely abstract and general model
    based on connectivity
  • Geometry is an attribute of the parts

12
Degrees of Freedom
  • An objects location in space is completely
    specified when three translations (X, Y, Z) and
    three rotations ( ) are specified
  • How many DOFs are constrained?
  • cube on table (x-y plane)
  • cube at floor-wall interface
  • cube at floor-two walls interface
  • ball on table
  • ball at floor-wall interface
  • round peg in blind round hole

13
Constraints
  • Proper constraints provide a single value for
    each of a bodys 6 degrees of freedom
  • This is done by establishing surface contacts
    with surfaces on another part or parts
  • If less than 6 dof have definite values, the body
    is under-constrained
  • If an attempt is made to provide 2 or more values
    for a dof, then the body is over-constrained
    because rigid bodies have only 6 dof

14
Constraints (examples)
15
Constraints (examples)
16
Creating an Assembly
  • Parts join at places called assembly features
  • Different features constrain different numbers
    and kinds of degrees of freedom of the respective
    parts (symmetrically)
  • Parts may join by
  • one pair of features
  • multiple features
  • several parts working together, each with its own
    features
  • When parts mate to fixtures, dofs are constrained

17
Assembly Features
  • Examples
  • Fixed
  • Revolute
  • Planar
  • Screw
  • Spherical
  • Prismatic

18
Example Phillips screw
19
Example Feature
20
Relating Features to Assembly Models
Depends on parts
Does not depend on parts
21
Data Structures for Assemblies
  • Typically an attributed graph or tree
  • Vertices parts
  • Edges
  • Part-to-part contacts
  • Usually represented as joints
  • Attributes
  • Kinematic specifications and constraints on the
    joints

22
Contact Graph
23
Data Structures for AssembliesExample
  • Part
  • Name motor
  • URL motor.sat
  • Transform Identity
  • Part
  • Name scanner
  • URL scanner.sat
  • Transform Identity
  • List of joints between parts
  • Joint Fixed
  • Name potentiometer_sleeve_screw_potentiometer_to
    _frame
  • BasePart potentiometer_sleeve
  • AttachedPart screw_potentiometer_to_frame
  • JointFeatures
  • Point potentiometer_sleeve 0 0 0
  • Point screw_potentiometer_to_frame 0 0 0
  • Joint Revolute

24
Assignment!
  • Oct 6
  • Mock up v1 of your Lego design
  • Photos on Wiki
  • Oct 10
  • 3D model(s) for your Lego design
  • Oct 13
  • An assembly of your Lego design

25
Introduction to Kinematics
  • Kinematics study of motion independent of
    underlying forces
  • Degrees of freedom (DoF) the number of
    independent position variables needed to specify
    motions
  • State Vector vector space of all possible
    configurations of an articulated figure. In
    general, the dimensions of state vector is equal
    to the DoF of the articulated figure.

26
Manipulator Joint Types
  • 1 DOF Joint types
  • Revolute
  • Prismatic

27
More Joint Types
  • Many higher order joint types can be represented
    by combining 1-DOF joints by making axes intersect

28
Forward vs. Inverse Kinematics
  • Forward kinematics motion of all joints is
    explicitly specified
  • Inverse kinematics given the position of the
    end effector, find the position and orientation
    of all joints in a hierarchy of linkages also
    called goal-directed motion.

29
END
30
What CAD Systems do
  • CAD systems analyze constraints
  • But CAD systems, developers, and researchers do
    not mean mechanical constraint, they mean
    geometric location consistency
  • Many designs called properly constrained by CAD
    systems are actually over-constrained
  • Different CAD systems do this analysis different
    ways and can disagree about the same assembly

31
What CAD Systems do
  • How CAD Systems Test Constraints
  • A closed chain of frames is set up
  • A numerical test is done to see if the chain
    closes
  • If, so, the assembly is called fully
    constrained
  • Detailed tests for constraint/consistency
    problems are done by making small shifts and
    testing for interference
  • Tolerance studies are done the same way
  • Analysis requires detailed geometry
  • Results depend on how the model was built

32
(No Transcript)
33
Mathematical Model
  • Basic Math
  • Uses 4x4 matrices to relate adjacent frames
  • Permits chaining together of parts
  • same math is used to describe robots
  • The matrix contains a rotational part and a
    translational part
  • The matrix is designed to translate first and
    then rotate so that rotation does not change
    position of new frame
  • This matrix is a subset of a more general
    projection matrix that includes perspective
  • History
  • Basic to Kinematics (Denavit Hartenberg)
  • Used to model assemblies in 1970s
  • S N Simunovic Masters Thesis, MIT, 1972
  • Edinburgh University AI Lab robot assembly 1976
  • Used by CAD researchers
  • Steve Coons, 1960s
  • Gossard and others, 1980s
  • Used by CAD systems to locate surfaces wrt each
    other
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com