5th Performance Rating Cycle 1 February 2006 31 January 2007 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – 5th Performance Rating Cycle 1 February 2006 31 January 2007 PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 15a1de-Y2M5M



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

5th Performance Rating Cycle 1 February 2006 31 January 2007

Description:

5th Performance Rating Cycle 1 February 2006 31 January 2007 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: johndem
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 5th Performance Rating Cycle 1 February 2006 31 January 2007


1
5th Performance Rating Cycle 1 February 2006 31
January 2007
  • Science and Technology (ST) Personnel
    Demonstration Project

2
Where We Are
  • Completed the 5th Performance Rating Cycle
  • Ten Pay Pools
  • Five Supervisory (Monmouth Belvoir)
  • Five Non- Supervisory (Monmouth Belvoir)
  • Total Demo Employees Rated 1026

583
359
84
3
Non-Supervisory Averages and Share Values
2.58
2.56
2.35
2.34
2.27
2.18
2.17
2.15
2.13
2.11
4
Supervisory Averages Share Values
2.01
2.01
2.00
1.97
1.96
1.95
1.94
1.91
1.91
1.88
5
Share Value Effect Higher Performer
SUPERVISORY
NON-SUPERVISORY
6
Share Value Effect Mid-Level Performer
SUPERVISORY
NON-SUPERVISORY
7
Effect of Score Creep on Pay for Performance of
Best Performer (BP) and Middle Performer (MP)
  • SV (Total SalariesContribution)/(Sum(SalariesS
    hares))
  • SV (Contribution)/(Avg Share Value)
  • SV 3.8/(Avg Share Value)
  • Pool Avg SV Salary Score Pay Out
  • 33.47 2.82 70K 46 (BP) 5,132
  • 30 (MP) 1,974
  • 34.47 2.63 70K 47 (BP) 4,970
  • 31 (MP) 2,025
  • 35.47 2.45 70K 49 (BP) 4,802
  • 32 (MP) 2058

As score average increases, better performers
pay out decreases yet lower performers payout
increases
8
Pay Pool Results Scores
9
Score Avg by Position by Directorate Supervisory
Includes Deputy PDs
N/A No Employees in This Position Less Than 3
Employee in This Position
10
Score Avg by Position by Directorate Non-Superviso
ry
N/A No Employees in This Position Less Than 3
Employee in This Position
11
Comparison of Scores by Family (733)
Non-Supervisory Employees
PY05
57
52
48
40
35
32
14
10
8
2
.6
1.2
.3
1
12
Comparison of Scores by Family (292)
Supervisory Employees
100
PY05
87
78

Average Score
ES (DB) 39.56 BT (DE) 39.57 Gen Spt (DK)
20
10
3
2
.4

13
Averages by Element
SUPERVISORY
NON-SUPERVISORY
14
Impact of Mid-Point Rule
  • Employees whose salary is past the mid-point
    salary of their band must score 30 or higher to
    receive a base pay increase.

20
15
10
5
HQ/SED/PRD
NVESD
STCD
I2WD
C2D
15
Impact of Significant Accomplishment Rule
DB-03 Employees whose salary is at or within the
top 15 salary range of the band must score in
the top 1/3 to get the normal 2/3 base pay
increase, middle 3rd receives 1 base pay
increase, lower 3rd all bonus
Top 15 of DB-03 87,421-102,848 2007 base pay
rate
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
HQ/SED/PRD
NVESD
STCD
I2WD
C2D
About PowerShow.com