Ecotonal blue and black grama: ecophysiological responses to precipitation changes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Ecotonal blue and black grama: ecophysiological responses to precipitation changes

Description:

Jim Gosz, Bob Parmenter, Cliff Dahm, Bruce Milne, Carl White, Deb Peters, Les ... Greg Shore, John Dewitt, Luis Guzman, Charles Curtin, Tamara Hochstrasser, Ray ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: sevLt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ecotonal blue and black grama: ecophysiological responses to precipitation changes


1
Ecotonal blue and black grama ecophysiological
responses to precipitation changes
  • Chuck Buxbaum

Dept of Biology, UNM
2
  • Blue grama
  • Colorado shortgrass steppe dominant
  • Slow growing
  • Long-lived
  • Grazing resistant
  • Drought sensitive
  • Seed dispersal
  • May-Sept. establishment
  • Deep rooting
  • Fine soils
  • Black grama
  • Chihuahuan Desert dominant
  • Quick growing
  • Not-so-long-lived
  • Grazing sensitive
  • Drought resistant
  • Vegetative reproduction
  • July establishment
  • Shallow rooting
  • Varied soils

3
Is coexistence stable?
No
Yes
Competitive exclusion
Resource partitioning
Hypothesis Blue and Black grama coexistence is
stable Prediction Different resource use,
temporally spatially
4
  • Responses to different amounts of precipitation
  • Hypotheses
  • Blue grama will respond more positively to
    increased precipitation
  • Black grama will not decline as rapidly with
    decreased precipitation
  • Treatments 0, 100, 200 precipitation

5
  • Responses to different seasons of precipitation
  • Hypotheses
  • Blue grama will respond more positively to
    winter/spring precipitation
  • Black grama will respond more positively to
    summer precipitation
  • Precipitation treatments
  • no rain, cold season rain, warm season rain,
    control

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
  • Conclusions (Part I)
  • 2-year growth responses similar between species
  • Plant phosphorus correlated with growth response,
    but not nitrogen
  • Black grama more nutrient-use efficient
  • Interaction between treatment and species
    suggested by multivariate analysis

12
no rain/gracilis
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
  • Conclusions (Part II)
  • 2-year growth responses differ -- Blue grama
    uses winter precipitation.
  • plant nutrient concentrations are highest in
    winter drought treatment.
  • some interaction between treatment and species
    suggested by multivariate analysis.
  • PRECIPITATION IS UTILIZED DIFFERENTLY BY BLUE AND
    BLACK GRAMA

Coexistence is stable
16
Thank you to Jim Gosz, Bob Parmenter, Cliff
Dahm, Bruce Milne, Carl White, Deb Peters, Les
McFadden, Carol Treadwell, John Craig, Doug
Moore, Greg Shore, John Dewitt, Luis Guzman,
Charles Curtin, Tamara Hochstrasser, Ray Romero,
Susan Geer, the US FWS and many others. Funded
by Sevilleta LTER summer R.A. program
(1995-1996), Albuquerque Daylily Society, UNM
Biology GRAC, and Sandia Preparatory School
17
(No Transcript)
18
Landscape evolution of the Llano de Manzano
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com