Dublin Project Kingston University Level Two Project Botanic Road, Dublin Nigel Dubben, Richard Cheeseman - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Dublin Project Kingston University Level Two Project Botanic Road, Dublin Nigel Dubben, Richard Cheeseman

Description:

Dublin Project. Kingston University. Level Two Project. Botanic Road, Dublin ... any one of the papers authors at The School Of Surveying at Kingston University. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:163
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: sueorto
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dublin Project Kingston University Level Two Project Botanic Road, Dublin Nigel Dubben, Richard Cheeseman


1
Dublin ProjectKingston UniversityLevel Two
ProjectBotanic Road, DublinNigel Dubben,
Richard Cheeseman Gavin Ward

2
Aim
  • Get to know one another better
  • Get an idea of a real property problem
  • Understand the importance of working in teams, as
    consultants do on development projects in
    practice.
  • Get a flavour for the type of work undertaken by
    property professionals
  • Have some fun!

3
The Task
  • Group Formation
  • The Site
  • Background/ The role of Institutes and
    consultants visited
  • Meeting the clients requirement.

4
The Task
  • Group Selection Process
  • Role Play
  • Teamwork

5
The Task
  • Reporting Medium- Feasibility Stage
  • Potential Problems
  • Anticipated Outcomes
  • Individual Contributions-
  • Estate Management Property Planning
    Development Students
  • Quantity Surveying Consultancy Students
  • Building Surveying Students
  • Group Contributions

6
Approach
  • Students approach this group element of the
    project from a variety of perspectives
  • As stated in the paper not all the groups, even
    though they are often sized in eights always
    follow the patterns observed by Belbin (2004) and
    often the groups appear to follow the patterns
    identified by Gersick (1990).
  • Groups require a variety of levels of tutor
    facilitation/participation throughout the
    project, both in Dublin and back in the UK
    following the project trip.

7
Assessment Methods
  • Pier Assessment
  • Client assessment
  • Tutor assessment

8
Results
  • The results clearly indicate that the students
    with UCAS entry points in the 200-300 UCAS point
    range have performed well on this Dublin Field
    trip from both the 04/05 academic cohort and the
    03/04 cohort, with 79 and 50 of students in the
    03/04 and 04/05 cohorts respectively achieving an
    overall final mark of 60 or over.
  • In the 03/04 cohort students in the UCAS entry
    point bands 100-200 had 58 of the students
    obtain 60 or more in the field trip, whereas in
    the 04/05 cohort this was much reduced to 14.
  • However it should be noted that the random sample
    size in relation to the total population of the
    03/04 cohort is much bigger than that taken for
    the 04/05 cohort, which could account for at
    least some of the marked differences between the
    two cohort groupings.
  • The results generally for the 03/04 cohort
    reflect the fact that the students with the lower
    UCAS entry points have done particularly well in
    terms of their final assessment grading for this
    Dublin Project, especially those with only up to
    100 UCAS Entry Points, of whom 67 achieved an
    overall mark of 60 or over.

9
Results
  • The results that are reflected in the paper do
    provide some evidence to reflect the experiences
    of the participating tutors that students with
    some of the lower UCAS entry point scores often
    succeed particularly well when operating in these
    types of group projects.
  • Such students actually take a positive leading
    role, rather than sit back and watch more able
    academic students do all the work and the more
    practical nature of such students actually
    compliments well with the more academically able
    members of the group, such that the groups often
    work very smoothly and produce some good quality
    work together and the element of pier group
    learning and assessment aids in the process as
    well.

10
Conclusions Recommendations
  • Group work often facilitates greater student
    learning than some other methods of teaching and
    learning
  • The international experience stretches the
    students learning experiences and appears to
    inspire and motivate their interest in the
    project, which greatly enhances learning.
  • Less able students do tend to work very hard in
    the groups and do not rely on others, albeit at
    times tutor involvement in groups is required to
    varying degrees so that learning outcomes are
    facilitated satisfactorily.

11
Conclusions Recommendations
  • Students, often with the lower UCAS entry points
    learn particularly well on UK Surveying Degree
    programmes, which being of a vocational
    orientation are quite practical, reflecting the
    skills of the practitioners. This is a facet that
    less academically able students appear to thrive
    on and do particularly well on.
  • More group work and pier learning would benefit
    UK Surveying Degree programmes.
  • Further Studies need to be undertaken to
    establish how well such students, with low UCAS
    entry points, do at the APC.

12
Any Questions?
  • Please feel free to field any questions that you
    may have in relation to the project.
  • If anybody requires further details of the
    project, please feel free to contact any one of
    the papers authors at The School Of Surveying at
    Kingston University.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com