National Chiefs Task Force on Consultation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

National Chiefs Task Force on Consultation

Description:

Facilitating relationship building between the Crown and First Nations ... Both the federal and provincial Crowns have a duty to consult ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: richa99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Chiefs Task Force on Consultation


1
National Chiefs Task Force on Consultation
Accommodation
  • Assembly of First Nations

2
Role of AFN Supporting First Nations
  • Communication of First Nations policy
    perspectives
  • Promotion of greater awareness and respect of
    First Nations rights and interests
  • Facilitating relationship building between the
    Crown and First Nations
  • Advocating First Nations rights and interests

3
Origins of the Duties
  • Inherent Rights rights pre-existing to
    colonization recognized in s.35 of the
    Constitution Act
  • Treaties Aboriginal title rights identified
    in treaties give rise to duties to consult
    accommodate according to the given Treaty
  • Modern treaties or self-government agreements
    also identify these duties
  • Common Law recognition standard in court
    decisions, full enunciation of duties still
    evolving

4
Standards So Far
  • Courts have set some standards
  • Crowns fiduciary duty means First Nations
    interests have priority over other interests
  • Duties to consult accommodate apply to resource
    use as well as legislative policy development
  • Crown must discharge can not delegate duties
  • Duties to consult accommodate are separate
  • Consultation along a continuum from simple
    notification to full consent based on the level
    of infringement/impact and the nature of a First
    Nations interests
  • Little direction yet on content of accommodation
    duty
  • Objective is reconciliation of Crown sovereignty
    with pre-existing Aboriginal title rights

5
Critical factors in Consultation
  • Both the federal and provincial Crowns have a
    duty to consult
  • The Crown cannot delegate its fiduciary
    obligation to consult to a third party
  • Consultation must genuinely attempt to address
    First Nations concerns about the impact of an
    action on their rights, and have no predetermined
    outcome
  • Accommodation is the reconciliation of the
    sovereignty of the Crown with pre-existing rights
    of First Nations

6
Nature of Duties
  • Duties apply to any Crown action that may
    infringe an Aboriginal right or interest
  • Duty is triggered at the earliest instance, where
    there is potential or constructive knowledge of
    impact on First Nations rights or title, either
    established or asserted
  • First Nations also have a duty to engage in
    consultation non-participation is interpreted
    as declaration of non-interest

7
Principle of First Nations Consent
  • Principle reflected in First Nations law and
    policy and is supported by the UN Declaration on
    the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which
    recognizes that the free, prior, and informed
    consent of First Nations is required
  • for development activities on First Nations
    traditional lands
  • in the development of legislative or
    administrative measures affecting First Nations
  • The UN Declaration recognizes that the right to
    self-determination including the right to
    consent and to withhold consent is held by each
    First Nation
  • Currently, under Canadian Common Law, consent is
    required in the instance of established rights
    and where the infringement is determined to be
    significant
  • determination of infringement impacts must be
    made with First Nations cannot be done
    unilaterally

8
Resource Development
  • 350 Billion in resource development in around
    First Nations territories over the next 10 years
  • Title, rights interests will vary across the
    country depending on the First Nation involved
  • Process for consultation will depend on
    traditions structures of First Nation involved
  • Conflict results in delay, increased costs, lost
    opportunity costs deepened impoverishment of
    First Nations

9
Legislative Policy Development
  • Crown must consult First Nations on policies or
    bills that may affect rights interests
  • Legal duty exists in addition to consultation as
    a matter of good public policy
  • Unilateral Crown approach which may infringe
    First Nations rights will be subject to
    judicial scrutiny carrying the risk of a Crown
    decision or activity being held to be void or
    unenforceable
  • Such an approach is clearly counter-productive
    resulting in delay, high costs to all involved,
    ineffective policy development and ongoing
    implementation issues

10
First Nations Consultation Policies, Protocols
and Agreements
  • A growing number of First Nations and PTOs have
    developed, or are in the process of developing,
    their own consultation protocols or policies
  • These often require
  • Early engagement by the Crown or developers
    respectful relationship building
  • First Nations involvement in process design
  • Recognition of inherent and treaty rights, right
    of self-determination
  • Respect of First Nations right to consent where
    rights or interests may be negatively impacted
  • First Nations participation in decision-making

11
First Nations Consultation Policies, Protocols
and Agreements
  • First Nations with comprehensive self- government
    agreements have negotiated legally-binding
    consultation provisions with the Crown and these
    agreements cannot be amended without the consent
    of the First Nation concerned.
  • Some self-governing First Nations also have
    negotiated separate consultation protocol
    agreements with other governments.
  • Implementation remains a critical concern, and in
    a number of cases treaties, protocols or
    provisions are not upheld by representatives of
    the Crown

12
Emerging Issues
  • The federal government has initiated a number of
    programs and legislative changes that may signal
    divergence from acceptable standards of
    consultation and accommodation.
  • These are
  • Major Projects Management Office
  • Amendments to Navigable Waters Protections Act
  • Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA).

13
  • Major Projects Management Office
  • Streamline approvals for major resource projects
    into two years. Shift consultation requirements
    to project proponents.
  • Navigable Waters Protection Act Amendments
  • Minister has complete discretion to list any
    lake, river, stream as a minor waterway. No
    Environmental assessment will be required for
    projects on minor rivers.
  • No requirement for notice, consultation or
    accommodation of First Nations interests or
    impacts from projects.
  • There will be infringements to FN water
    navigation rights.

14
Proposed Changes to CEAA
  • No environmental assessments for any project on
    federal lands, where federally funded, or any
    federal infrastructure project worth less than
    10 million.
  • Exempt any project from federal environmental
    assessment at the request of a provincial
    government.
  • This could mean
  • There will be a weakening of the duty to consult
    resulting from the exemption of EAs, as EA is a
    current tool recognized by the Courts as a
    consultation mechanism.
  • First Nation rights will increasingly be
    adjudicated under the realm of administrative law
    (judicial review of government decisions), rather
    than the higher level of constitutional law.

15
National Chiefs Task Force (NCTF) on
Consultation and Accommodation
  • Response to call for a unified and coordinated
    First Nations approach to myriad efforts by
    federal government regarding Consultation and
    Accommodation
  • Intent to support First Nations governments in
    the development of protocols, processes and
    policies
  • Working with regional representatives to develop
    First Nations minimum standards for Crown
    behaviour

16
National Chiefs Task Force (NCTF) activities to
date
  • Two meetings of full Task Force January 28
    March 16, 2009 and two regional fora (East/West)
    took place March 2-3, 2009
  • Represents the beginnings of the conversation
    key preparatory work to develop coordinated FN
    position
  • Canada is pushing short timelines for input to
    policy approach AFN is attempting to secure
    additional resources to continue work and
    coordinate a unified FN response, as directed by
    Task Force

17
National Chiefs Task Force (NCTF) proposed next
steps
  • AFN has developed proposal to INAC for support
    to
  • Conduct in-depth analysis, including
  • A review of jurisprudence and govt. responses
  • A legal analysis of the Federal Interim
    Guidelines
  • Synthesis of First Nation and indigenous
    approaches to consultation and accommodation
  • Models and mechanisms for dispute resolution
  • Using analysis and working with FN
    representation, develop the initial framework for
    a coordinated First Nation response, to contain
    minimum standards and requirements for Crown and
    industry behaviour
  • Convene a National Policy Forum to review and
    discuss response
  • Seek endorsement of coordinated position by
    Chiefs at the December 2009 Special Chiefs
    Assembly
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com