Pitfalls in Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Pitfalls in Research

Description:

Richards JT, Read JRM & Chambers WA Extradural anaesthesia as a method of pre ... McDermott ME, Smith BH, Elliot AM, Bond CM, Hannaford PC Chambers WA. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: williamc6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pitfalls in Research


1
Pitfalls in Research
  • Professor Alastair Chambers
  • University of Aberdeen

2
Declarations of Interest
  • Editor of Anaesthesia
  • Reviewer for BJA, Pain, EJP, Palliative Care
    Journals
  • Reviewer of grant applications - AAGBI, NIAA,
    HTA, various RD
  • Currently researching chronic post mastectomy
    pain and community PMPs
  • Example problems have been anonymised and
    disguised

3
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

4
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

5
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

6
Research?
  • Why bother?

7
Research - why do it?
  • Why not just do an audit project
  • Less problem with ethics
  • Anyone can do an audit project (and many do)
  • Finished more quickly
  • More difficult to get published
  • May improve local practice - but not more

8
Research - why do it?
  • Commercial Research
  • act as clinical technician and get paid for it
  • work with company to design and run project

9
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

10
Research in Pain - Where do you start?
  • Initial thoughts
  • Literature Review
  • Be very wary of reports of animal work

11
Problems with animals
12
Problems with animal research
  • Efficacy - what is being measured in behaviour?
  • Many side effects - dizziness?
  • Validation is often ignored
  • Automated measures
  • Irrelevant tests
  • Doses and treatments

13
Where do you start?
  • Initial thoughts
  • Literature Review
  • Be very wary of reports of animal work
  • Formulate RESEARCH QUESTION or HYPOTHESIS TO TEST
  • AND WRITE IT DOWN!

14
I want to find out whether morphine is more
effective than paracetamol for patients on my
gynae list.
  • I wish to compare the effect of 10mg morphine
    against 2G paracetamol administered intravenously
    30 minutes prior to the end of intermediate
    gynaecological surgery.

15
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

16
Difficulties with protocol (1)
  • Measuring the subjective
  • Difficulty getting homogeneous population
  • Ethics
  • Time
  • Changing practice

17
Measurement Issues (1)Visual Analogue Scale

_________________________________
No Pain
Severe Pain
18
Visual Analogue Scale
No Pain
Severe Pain
_________________________________
19
Visual Analogue Scale
No Pain
Severe Pain
_________________________________
20
Measurement Issues (2)
  • Unvalidated Instruments
  • Inappropriate Instruments
  • Lack of blinding

21
Difficulties with protocol (2)
  • Difficulty getting homogeneous population
  • Ethics
  • Time - contemporaneous/recall bias
  • Changing practice

22
Difficulties with protocol (3)
  • Recruitment NEVER as good as expected
  • Protocol violations
  • Research designers need to be familiar with
    clinical practice

23
Methodology
  • Questionnaires - the easy option?

24
Questionnaires
  • Usually poorly thought out
  • Usually poorly set out
  • Usually poor response
  • Analysis poor or worse
  • Results not robust or reliable

25
Questionnaires
  • Confidential better than Anonymous
  • True random sample better than large sample
  • Use of validated instruments vital
  • Remember ethics might be essential

26
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

27
Purpose of Statistics
  • Provide description
  • Make inferences about patterns/differences
    between data sets

28
Inferential Statistics
  • Comment on likelihood of variation NOT arising by
    chance
  • Never use statistics in isolation result must
    be plausible
  • Statistical design must be robust

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Problems with Statistics
  • Power of study
  • Usually calculated in terms of primary outcome
  • Therefore may be inadequate for other items

32
  • No serious complications were observed in any of
    the 20 patients studiedIt is safe to administer
    this treatment.
  • If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right?
    Interpreting zero numerators
  • Hanley Lippman-Hand JAMA 1983 249 1743-5
  • Gambling with ethics? A statistical note on the
    Poisson (binomial) distribution
  • Pandit J, Anaesthesia, 2008 63 1163-6

33
Randomisation
  • THE most important feature of sampling
  • Increasing size will not compensate for poor
    randomisation
  • Every object has an equal chance of inclusion

34
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

35
ETHICAL ISSUES
  • Is it really necessary? For a study on
    mannikins???
  • If the LREC say its ok, then it must be
    ethically ok!
  • Difficult editors or editors with difficulty?

36
ANAESTHESIAInstructions to Authors
  • Studies of novel treatments, in particular
    drug studies where the agent used is given via
    unlicensed routes (especially spinal and
    epidural), may have received approval from the
    Research Ethics Committee or equivalent, but the
    Editorial Board is likely to reject such studies
    if it considers that the risks posed outweigh the
    potential benefits. Such a conclusion is more
    likely to be reached if the drug in question is
    not widely used in routine practice (as evidenced
    by inclusion in standard textbooks), if the study
    participants are especially vulnerable (e.g.
    children, women in labour), if there are
    questions over consent, or if only modest
    improvements in outcome are expected where other,
    well established methods already exist.

37
Other Pitfalls
  • Not asking for advice
  • Asking for advice
  • Not piloting or assessing feasibility
  • Not taking statistical advice
  • Not having enough help/assistance
  • Having too many assistants/helpers

38
Issues to consider
  • Get things in the right order!
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What are you doing?
  • Protocol
  • Pilot
  • Statistics
  • Ethics
  • Finishing it off

39
Publications with trainees
  • Parris MR Chambers WA Effects of the addition
    of potassium to prilocaine or bupivacaine
    studies on axillary nerve blockade Br J Anaesth,
    1986 58 297-300
  • MacLean D, Chambers WA, Tucker GT Wildsmith JAW
    Plasma levels of prilocaine following three
    techniques of brachial plexus block Br J Anaesth,
    1987 60 136-40
  • Ronald AL, Ramayya GP Chambers WA An
    inexpensive method of capturing oximetry data Br
    J Anaesth, 1992 69 105-7
  • Ronald AL, Docherty D, Broom J Chambers WA
    Morphine absorption following spinal anaesthesia
    Anesth Analg (Cleve), 1993 76 778-82
  • Byers GF, Parkin DE, Pinion S Chambers WA Fluid
    absorption during endometrial resection
    Gynaecological Endoscopy, 1993 2 21-3
  • Power I, Bowler GMR, Pugh GC Chambers WA
    Ketorolac as a component of balanced analgesia
    after thoracotomy Br J Anaesth, 1994 72 224-6
  • Martin PD Chambers WA Teaching airway
    management in anaesthetised patients Scottish Med
    J, 1994 39 111-3
  • Smith BH, Read JRM, Grimshaw JM, Watt BG
    Chambers WA Researching chronic pain
    identification of a community based sample The
    Pain Clinic, 1996, 73-6

40
  • Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Grimshaw
    J, Chambers WA Smith WC The Chronic Pain Grade
    Questionnaire validation and reliability in
    postal research Pain, 199771 141-7
  • Richards JT, Read JRM Chambers WA Extradural
    anaesthesia as a method of pre-emptive analgesia
    for abdominal hysterectomy Anaesthesia, 1998
    53 296-8
  • Hunter JD, Penny KI Chambers WA Minor morbidity
    after day case surgery
  • Scottish Med J, 1998 43 54-6
  • Purves A, Munro C, Smith BH, Grimshaw J, Wilson
    B, Smith WCS Chambers WA Defining chronic pain
    for epidemiological research assessing a
    subjective definition. The Pain Clinic, 1998 10
    139 47
  • Smith WC, Bourne D, Squair J, Phillips DO,
    Chambers WA. A retrospective cohort study of
    post mastectomy pain syndrome. Pain 1999 83
    91-95
  • McCartney CJL Chambers WA Review Coeliac
    plexus block Current Anaesthesia Critical Care
    2000 6 101-105
  • McCartney CJ, Cooper G, Smith WCS Chambers WA.
    Pain and disability following lower limb
    amputation - a quantitative and qualitative
    study. The Pain Clinic, 2000 12 36-41

41
  • McCartney CJL Chambers WA. Central Neuraxial
    Techniques for Cancer Pain Current Anaesthesia
    Critical Care 2000 11 166 172
  • Kumar N, Chambers WA Tunnelling epidural
    catheters a worthwhile exercise?Anaesthesia.
    200055 625-6.
  • Chambers WA, Ferguson K, Prescott GJ Continuing
    medical education by anaesthetists in scotland
    activities, motivation and barriers. Anaesthesia.
    200055 1192-7.
  • Kumar RN, Chambers WA, Pertwee RG Pharmacological
    actions and therapeutic uses of cannabis and
    cannabinoids. Anaesthesia. 2001 56 1059-68
  • Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA,
    Krukowski ZH, Smith WCS Chronic pain and quality
    of life following open inguinal hernia repair
    British J Surgery. 2001 88 1122-1126
  • Linklater GT, Leng ME, Tiernan EJ, Lee MA,
    Chambers WA Pain management services in
    palliative care a national survey. Palliat Med.
    2002 16 435-9.
  • Bruce J, Chambers WA Questionnaire surveys.
    Anaesthesia. 2002 57 1049-51
  • Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WCS, King PM,
    Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA
  • A review of chronic pain following inguinal
    herniorraphy Clin J Pain. 2003 19 48-54

42
  • Haetzman M, Elliott AM, Smith BH, Hannaford P,
    Chambers WA Chronic pain and the use of
    conventional and alternative therapy. Fam Pract.
    2003 20 147-54
  • Bruce J, Drury N, Poobalan AS, Jeffrey RR, Smith
    WCS, Chambers WA The prevalence of chronic chest
    and leg pain following cardiac surgery a
    historical cohort study Pain. 2003
    Jul104(1-2)265-73
  • Bruce J, Poobalan AS, Smith WCS, Chambers WA
    Quantitative assessment of chronic post surgical
    pain using the Magill Questionnaire. Clinical J
    Pain. 2004 20(2) 70-5
  • Macdonald L, Bruce J. Scott NW, Smith WC,
    Chambers WA Long-term follow-up of breast cancer
    survivors with post-mastectomy pain syndrome. Br
    J Cancer. 2005 Jan 3192(2)225-30
  • McDermott ME, Smith BH, Elliot AM, Bond CM,
    Hannaford PC Chambers WA. The use of medication
    for chronic pain in primary care, and the
    potential for intervention by a practice-based
    pharmacist. Fam Pract. 2006 Feb23(1)46-52.
  • Saqr L, Chambers WA Preventing excessive
    pre-operative fasting national guideline or
    local protocol? Anaesthesia. 2006 Jan61(1) 23-5
  • McCartney CJL Chambers WA Preoperative
    analgesicswhat is wrong with the oral route?
    Anaesthesia, 1998 53 607
  • McCartney CJL, Herriot R, Chambers WA Bilateral
    hand oedema related to Acupuncture Pain, 2000
    84429-430
  • Lee MA, Leng ME, Tiernan EJ, Chambers WA A simple
    method of using epidural analgesia in palliative
    medicine. Palliat Med. 2001 15 347-8

43
(No Transcript)
44
Why present data?
  • Makes the paper longer
  • Nice graphs break up boring text
  • Everyone will believe what you say

45
Why you really should present data
  • To allow reader to check what you say
  • To put it in context
  • To clarify or expand on what you have written

46
Errors in presentation
  • using standard errors for descriptive
    information
  • presenting means of continuous data without
    any indication of variability
  • presenting results of statistical analysis
    solely as a p-value

47
Examples of precision
  • P 10-54
  • P 0.5254
  • R 0.99299
  • ?2 0.7264
  • 86.95 of cases

48
Even more precise
  • Relationship of birth weight (BWt) to chest
    circumference (CC) and mid-arm circumference (AC)
  • BWt -3.0983527 0.142088CC 0.158039AC
  • Predicts birth weight to the nearest 1/10000g!!

49
Misleading features on graphs
  • Lack of true zero on vertical axis
  • Change of scale in the middle of an axis
  • Three dimensional effects
  • Failure to show coincident points in a scatter
    diagram
  • Showing a fitted regression line without scatter
    diagram of raw data
  • Superimposing graphs with different vertical
    scales
  • Plotting means without any indication of
    variability

50
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com