PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF Living Modified Organisms IN THE UK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF Living Modified Organisms IN THE UK

Description:

PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF Living Modified Organisms IN THE UK – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: M57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF Living Modified Organisms IN THE UK


1
PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF Living Modified
Organisms IN THE UK
  • International Plant Health Risk Analysis workshop
    24 - 28 October 2005 Niagara Falls, Canada

Alison J Wright Paul W Bartlett Plant Health
Consultants Defra, Central Science Laboratory,
York, England - United Kingdom
2
Outline
  • Legislative administrative procedures
  • LMO approval process for contained use
  • deliberate release in the UK/EU
  • To explain role of different authorities
  • In UK PH scientists directly responsible for PH
    assessment aligned with
  • Risk analysis procedures use of ISPM 11
  • Risk of Non-approved illegal LMOs

3
APPROVAL OF LMOSLEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND
  • LMOs intended for contained use
  • (EC Council Directive 90/218/EEC, as amended).
  • LMOs intended for deliberate release
  • (EC Council Directive 2001/18/EC Regulation
    EC/1829/2003 on GM food feed).
  • LMOs as plant pests
  • (EC Council Directive 2000/29/EC).

4
Legislation
  • Note these Directives have to be enacted as
    legislation in each Member State
  • Thus UK has own legislation.
  • Legislation recognises two different types of
    uses
  • Contained use - specific containment measures are
    used to limit LMOs contact with the general
    population and the environment
  • Deliberate release no specific containment
    measures are used to limit LMOs contact with the
    general population the environment

5
Contained Use - Approval of LMOs
  • In Britain, the Health Safety Executive(HSE) is
    competent authority responsible for approvals
  • Persons wanting to handle a GMO must provide an
    Environmental risk assessments for proposed
    contained use of GM micro-organisms and GM
    plants
  • How they do this is to assign a risk category for
    the proposed work
  • Class 1 (no/negligible risk),
  • Class 2 (low risk),
  • Class 3 (moderate risk) and
  • Class 4 (high risk)

6
Contained Use - Approval of MICRO-ORGANISM LMOs
  • If a Class 3 or 4 Environmental risk assessment
    on GM micro-organisms these passed to government
    technical advisers for comment on risks to
    humans, animals, plants etc.
  • Comment on plant health risks is provided by CSL
    plant health scientists
  • Consent issued by HSE
  • If Class 1 or 2 (low risks) a risk assessment
    prepared but work starts no prior approval.
  • Most work on Plant pathogens are class 1 or 2.

7
Contained Use - Approval of PLANT LMOs
  • For contained use of GM plants an environmental
    risk assessment (ERA) is required
  • The ERA has to be retained for 10 years but the
    work does not have to be notified, even if risks
    are identified.
  • Considered to be a weakness but Plant Health
    licensing currently requires prior notification
    and approval.

8
Control of LMO plant pests under Plant Health
legislation
  • In Great Britain, the Plant Health Authorities of
    the Department of Food Rural Affairs (Defra)
    are responsible
  • Plant Health licences are issued for work on
    plant pathogens not normally present in Great
    Britain. This includes LMOs.
  • This includes modified plant pests and LMO plants
    thay may contain pathogenic sequence
  • Work can only commence once a licence is issued
    with details of containment requirements.
  • (being reviewed with legislation change)

9
Examples of contained use of LMOs
  • LMO fungi mutation of specific genes to examine
    the process of infection
  • LMO viruses Viral vectors (e.g. PVX, TNV) used
    to introduce novel proteins of pharmaceutical use
    or toxins
  • LMO invertebrates the development of a new
    version of Sterile insect technique.

10
Deliberate Release Approval of LMOs
  • In all UK, the Defra GM unit is responsible for
    approvals
  • Separate applications for experimental releases
    and for marketing
  • Risk assessments submitted by applicants
  • Assessments sent on to government technical
    advisers (AH, PH, Fish, Vet. Medicines) for
    comment
  • includes CSL Plant Health scientists
  • Separate applications for either experimental
    or for marketing.

11
Deliberate Release Approval of LMOs Experimental
Purposes
  • For Research or Development.
  • Original risk assessment Comments by government
    advisers submitted to an independent advisory
    body of leading scientists for examination and
    approval
  • Advisory Committee for Releases to the
    Environment (ACRE)
  • Provides advice to Ministers on risk to human
    health environment
  • Authorisation of experimental releases under
    specific conditions.
  • (similar system for bio-control organisms but no
    EC legislation)

12
Deliberate Release Plant health concerns
  • Genotypic make-up. Use of plant pathogens
    pathogenic sequences e.g. Agrobacterium
    tumeifaciens, Cauliflower mosaic virus
    sequences.
  • Environmental. Gene flow of herbicide tolerant
    gene flow to soil fungi .
  • E.g. In Fusarium resistance work.
  • Concern addressed by small scale release.
  • Or Plant pathogen per se.
  • E.g. the GM bacterium produced may be pathogenic.

13
Deliberate Release Examples of UK GMO releases
  • Herbicide tolerance sugar beet/maize
  • oilseed rape (canola)
  • Starch/carbohydrate change
    Potato
  • Virus/nematode/blight resistance
    Potato
  • Fungal resistance Wheat
  • Biocontrol against damping-off fungus
    Bacterium
  • wild type Pseudomonas fluorescens used does not
    cause disease in (animals or) plants

14
Deliberate Release Approval of LMOs Marketing
  • Approval for marketing of LMOs and LMO products
    given at EC level
  • May be import processing only
  • From 2004 single EC procedure for authorisation
    of all food feed derived from GMO.
  • Member States comment on applications
  • As with experimental releases, CSL plant health
    scientists comment and ACRE provides an opinion
    on environmental risks to European Food Safety
    Authority (EFSA) of EC Commission.
  • Business operators only need do one application
  • for all EU.

15
Examples of EU marketing consents for LMOs
  • For import processing only (not to be grown in
    the EU)
  • Soya bean (herbicide tolerant)
  • Oilseed rape (herbicide tolerant)
  • Maize (insect resistant herbicide tolerant).
  • For cultivation in the EU
  • Tobacco (herbicide tolerant)
  • Maize (insect resistant herbicide tolerant)
  • Carnations (modified flower colour).

16
PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES (1)
  • ISPM 11 PRA for quarantine pests , including
    analysis of environmental risks and living
    modified organisms.
  • Principles of ISPM 11 used by plant health
    specialists whatever the regulatory approval
    process involved.

17
PLANT HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES (2)
  • Consider using ISPM 11.
  • Can the LMO be considered a plant pest?
  • If yes,
  • Have the risks been adequately recognised?
  • and
  • Are the risk management procedures adequate?

18
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pestsStage 1
Initiation
  • Can the LMO be considered a plant pest?
  • Two types of LMOs of concern-
  • (i) Direct modification of a plant pest
  • (ii) Plants/other organisms e.g. biological
    control agents, which have been modified using a
    plant pest or modified to contain/express
    material derived from a plant pest.

19
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pests Stage 1
Initiation
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes or
    other plant pests/parts of plant pests (e.g.
    cauliflower mosaic virus) are widely used to
    construct transgenic plants BUT
  • Usually this is disarmed i.e. plant
    pathogenic sequences removed, or
  • use of wild type Agrobacterium - an appropriate
    post-transformation antibiotic treatment has been
    done,
  • gt LMO is a priori considered not to be a plant
    pest
  • BUT Environmental risks may still need to be
    examined.

20
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pests Stage 1
Initiation
  • Construction of transgenic plants e.g.
  • Use of transgenes derived from plant pests e.g.
    virus coat proteins to convey disease resistance
  • Use of modified virus as a vector for gene
    delivery into plants e.g. for synthesis of novel
    proteins of pharmaceutical use.
  • gt LMO plant considered a potential plant pest

21
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pests Stage 2 Pest
Risk Assessment
  • Risk criteria for LMOs in Annex 3 to ISPM 11
    include consideration of -
  • Changes in adaptive characteristics
  • Adverse effects of gene transfer or gene flow
  • Adverse effects on non-target organisms
  • Genotypic instability or phenotypic instability
  • Other e.g. enhanced capacity for virus
    recombination.

22
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pests Stage 2 Pest
Risk Assessment
  • RA generally concerned with phenotypic
    characteristics but
  • Genotypic characteristics also need to be
    considered
  • e.g. use of wild type Agrobacterium
    tumefaciens
  • Also if non-indigenous source used for
    construction, the PH risk of the genetic material
    has to be assessed.

23
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pests Stage 3 Pest
Risk Management
  • What is the acceptable level of risk?
  • Refer to level of risk accepted for similar
    (parent) organisms
  • Depends on intended use-
  • For Contained use?
  • For planting or not?

24
ISPM 11 PRA for Quarantine pests Stage 3 Pest
Risk Management
  • Examples from marketing approvals
  • Oil seed rape (canola) for processing - controls
    on transport to processing plant
  • Maize for planting - Low risk of viable seed
    being produced in the UK (no volunteers).

25
RISK ANALYSIS OF NON-APPROVED LMOs
  • Risk alert of a non-approved LMO by-
  • PRA of commodity pathway as a result of an import
    request
  • Monitoring by the LMO authority for imports of
    non-approved LMOs or by plant health inspection
    services in their routine import checks.

26
RISK ANALYSIS OF NON-APPROVED LMOs
  • LMO issues for a PRA of a commodity pathway
  • Knowledge of worldwide LMO releases?
  • E.g. in Asia?
  • Direct risk from LMO plants.
  • E.g. altered host range cf. parent plant
  • Hitch-hiker risk from a
  • e.g. LMO biological control agents.

27
RISK ANALYSIS OF NON-APPROVED LMOs
  • LMO issues arises from LMO monitoring/plant
  • health import checks
  • Need for good molecular diagnostic techniques to
    distinguish non-approved LMO from either
    non-modified parent plant or any similar approved
    LMO plants.

28
Compliance
  • In UK have combined inspectorate for
  • Border
  • Exports
  • Marketing/Certification of planting material
  • Seeds
  • Containment facilities for Research etc..
  • The Plant Health Seeds Inspectorate
  • Field control of Deliberate release of GM by the
    GM Inspectorate in CSL Plant Health Group

29
Conclusions
  • In the UK, scientists of the plant health service
    are directly involved in risk analysis for risks
    to plants and the environment.
  • ISPM 11 provides the framework for phytosanitary
    PRA for LMOs (micro-organisms plants).
  • Under current EC legislation, consents for
    importation of LMO plants are handled by GM
    authorities in UK/EFSA at EU level. Plant health
    authorities are consulted.
  • Plant health services will need to consider how
    they incorporate assessment of LMO risks in
    import commodity PRAs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com