Setting Standards and Monitoring Quality for Online Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Setting Standards and Monitoring Quality for Online Learning PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: 14f44a-MjZmO



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Setting Standards and Monitoring Quality for Online Learning

Description:

Setting Standards and Monitoring Quality for Online Learning – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: ollive
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Setting Standards and Monitoring Quality for Online Learning


1
  • Setting Standards and Monitoring Quality for
    Online Learning
  • Presentation to the League of Innovation
  • Innovations 2005 Conference in NYC
  • March 6, 2005

2
History, Organization, Growth
  • Project Eagle, July 1999
  • - 5M in first grant
  • - develop online courses and systems
  • - created helpdesk and automated support
    systems and training
  • - equipped Commons development centers

3
History, Organization, Growth
  • Historic agreement, Nov. 1999
  • - centralized eCampus
  • - one stop shop for courses, contacts, and
    services
  • - guidelines for development and approval
  • - class size and lab fees established

4
History, Organization, Growth
  • eCampus website

5
History, Organization, Growth
  • The Three Faces of eCampus - Development
  • - Program Operations
  • - Technical Support
  • Clicks Supported by Bricks Philosophy

6
The Results
  • Meteoric Growth in enrollments

7
The Results
  • Meteoric Growth as of overall SSH
  • - Spr. 2001 12,429 SSH (9.1)
  • - Spr. 2002 17,828 SSH (12.3)
  • - Spr. 2003 25,093 SSH (15.0)
  • - Spr. 2004 32,204 SSH (18.3)

8
The Results
  • Meteoric Growth
  • - number of classes/sections spring
    00 59 90 spring 01
    88 137 spring 02 136 208 spring
    03 244 425 spring 04
    309 558
  • - geographically…

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
The Results
  • Recognized for Quality 1 Program in US

22
The Results
  • External Evaluation of Eagle 8/04
  • Project Eagle is an exceptional program that
    is providing a great service to the students and
    faculty of SPC. This program is accomplishing
    its goals efficiently and effectively and should
    be commended. This program can be held as an
    example to others interested in developing a
    significant presence in online higher education.

23
Quality Initiatives
  • Use of Full-Time Faculty/Central Staff
  • Wall of Sound Academic and Student Support
    Services
  • Review/Approval at the Highest Levels
  • Development Checklist robust interaction and
    multimedia components
  • Training Pathways to E-Learning
  • Flexible Access Delivery Form

24
(No Transcript)
25
Quality Initiatives
  • Use of Full-Time Faculty/Central Staff
  • Wall of Sound Academic and Student Support
    Services
  • Review/Approval at the Highest Levels
  • Development Checklist robust interaction and
    multimedia components
  • Training Pathways to E-Learning
  • Flexible Access Procedure

26
(No Transcript)
27
Quality Initiatives
  • Use of Full-Time Faculty/Central Staff
  • Wall of Sound Academic and Student Support
    Services
  • Review/Approval at the Highest Levels
  • Development Checklist robust interaction and
    multimedia components
  • Training Pathways to E-Learning
  • Flexible Access Procedure

28
(No Transcript)
29
Quality Initiatives
  • Use of Full-Time Faculty/Central Staff
  • Wall of Sound Academic and Student Support
    Services
  • Review/Approval at the Highest Levels
  • Development Checklist robust interaction and
    multimedia components
  • Training Pathways to E-Learning
  • Flexible Access Delivery Form

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Quality Initiatives
  • Use of Full-Time Faculty/Central Staff
  • Wall of Sound Academic and Student Support
    Services
  • Review/Approval at the Highest Levels
  • Development Checklist robust interaction and
    multimedia components
  • Training Pathways to E-Learning
  • Flexible Access Delivery Form

34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Quality Initiatives, contd
  • Mentoring
  • SSI, On-Going Monitoring course review
  • 3 Year Review Process
  • On-Going Research/Best Practices
  • Online Conduct Guidelines
  • Policy on Expectations/Performance Targets
  • Signature Courses Course Redesign

37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
Quality Initiatives, contd
  • Mentoring
  • SSI, On-Going Monitoring course review
  • 3 Year Review Process
  • On-Going Research/Best Practices
  • Online Conduct Guidelines
  • Policy on Expectations/Performance Targets
  • Signature Courses Course Redesign

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Quality Initiatives, contd
  • Mentoring
  • SSI, On-Going Monitoring course review)
  • 3 Year Review Process
  • On-Going Research/Best Practices
  • Online Conduct Guidelines
  • Policy on Expectations/Performance Targets
  • Signature Courses Course Redesign

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
Quality Initiatives, contd
  • Mentoring
  • SSI, On-Going Monitoring course review)
  • 3 Year Review Process
  • On-Going Research/Best Practices
  • Online Conduct Guidelines
  • Policy on Expectations/Performance Targets
  • Signature Courses Course Redesign

50
Online Conduct Guidelines
51
Quality Initiatives, contd
  • Mentoring
  • SSI, On-Going Monitoring course review)
  • 3 Year Review Process
  • On-Going Research/Best Practices
  • Online Conduct Guidelines
  • Policy on Expectations/Performance Targets
  • Signature Courses Course Redesign

52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
Quality Initiatives, contd
  • Mentoring
  • SSI, On-Going Monitoring course review)
  • 3 Year Review Process
  • On-Going Research/Best Practices
  • Online Conduct Guidelines
  • Policy on Expectations/Performance Targets
  • Signature Courses Course Redesign

57
(No Transcript)
58
Unresolved Quality Issues
  • Is the bar higher for online?
  • Testing… Plagarism (turnitin.com)
  • What cant be offered online without compromising
    quality?
  • Needed changes in policy (office hours, contact
    hours, facilities funding)
  • New technology new definitions? - wireless -
    universal high speed access - unlimited bandwidth
    and storage - PSI

59
(No Transcript)
60
Websites Referenced
  • Project Eagle (for forms, procedures, and access
    to BEEPs) www.spcollege.edu/eagle
  • eCampus http//e.spcollege.edu
  • For a copy of this presentation
    w/links www.spcollege.edu/eagle/presentations.htm

61
  • Thank You! Questions?
  • James Olliver, Provost
  • Seminole and eCampus
  • St. Petersburg College
  • olliver.james_at_spcollege.edu
About PowerShow.com