Title: ECONOMICS 3200M Lecture 19 March 27, 2006
1ECONOMICS 3200MLecture 19March 27, 2006
2Advertising
- Sales/marketing
- Segmentation of customers
- Individuals income, ethnicity, age, education,
etc., strategies of rivals - Firms size, location, alternative sources of
supply, strategies of rivals - Advertising strategies and budgets different
media - Trade shows
- Internal sales force vs. independent sales agents
exclusive arrangements - Technical skills pharmaceutical companies
(basis for competitive advantage), aircraft
manufacturers - Internet sites
- Distribution channels commission overrides,
promotional budgets
3Advertising
- Profit maximization and advertising
- P P(Q, A) ? inverse demand function with demand
depending upon quantum of advertising
expenditures - Past advertising expenditures investment
capital stock - Possibility of depreciation of stock of
advertising rate of depreciation may vary with
media - Profit function P(Q, A)Q C(Q) A
- Profit maximization conditions
- MRMC
- Q?P/ ?Q P ?C/ ?Q
- Q ?P/ ?A 1 ? A/PQ ?A/?
- However, different media for reaching consumers
relative importance of informational vs.
persuasive advertising - Prisoners dilemma
4Advertising
- Marketing/sales/advertising as entry barriers
- Example of pharmaceutical companies (big pharma)
and control of distribution channel doctors for
prescription medicines - Sunk cost for incumbents
- Increase entry costs
- Legal restrictions on false or misleading
advertising
5Durable Products
- Definition of durable products useful lifetime
(provides services/value to consumers) exceeds
length of time period between price revisions or
basic time period - Durable products
- Demand depends upon costs to consumers/customer
per unit of service provided per period of time - Autos provide transportation and other services
over their useful lives - Per unit per period costs
- Expected life-span of product
- Service per period of time without maintenance
- Re-sale value
- Maintenance costs (maintain quality/reliability/pe
rformance)
6Durable Products
- Durable products offered by monopolist at 2
different dates are substitutes - Monopolist creates own competition sell today,
reduce demand tomorrow (assuming no growth in
market) - With lower residual demand in period 2,monopoly
price in period 2 lt period 1 - Rational expectations by consumers expect lower
prices in future, thus decrease demand in period
1 - Non-rational expectations
- Only consumers with V(utility) gt P1(1) buy in
period 1 - Only consumers with V lt P1(1) available in period
2 residual demand in period 2
7V, P
P1(1)
P2(2)
MC
D(1)
D(2)
MR(1)
MR(2)
Q
Q1(1)
Q2(2)
8Durable Products
- Durable products offered by monopolist at 2
different dates are substitutes - With rational expectations, group of consumers
with V ? P1(1), P1(1) ? and (1?)V- P1(1) lt
?V- P2(2) (has product for two periods) ? )V-
P1(1) lt ?P1(1)- P2(2) shift demand to period 2 - Lower demand in period 1 leads to price lt P1(1)
in period 1 - Residual demand in period 2 may or may not be
higher
9Durable Products
- Monopoly and planned obsolescence
- By reducing durability, monopolist reduces stocks
carried forward to future time periods - Increases future period residual demands and
future prices, making waiting less attractive ?
increases demand in period 1 - Fashion products
- PLC reputation, entry barriers
10Durable Products
- Coase conjecture durable product monopolist that
sells has less market power than monopolist that
rents/leases - If customer buys product in period 1, unlikely
to buy same product in period 2 - Monopolist that sells has incentive to cut price
in future time periods, but not in case of
monopolist that rents/leases
11Durable Products
- Example 1 Monopolist who produces product that
can be recycled in future aluminum and scrap - Higher price in period 1 (than in case where
recycling not possible) to reduce sales volumes
and accumulation of scrap for future re-sale - Delay competition from scrap
12Durable Products
- Example 2 Product has useful life span of X
years but becomes technologically obsolete after
ZltX years - Consumers willing to pay maximum price (P) per
year for Z years value of annual services
provided - Maximum price consumers willing to pay at
beginning of period 1 PV of lease payments,
assuming that future prices P - If at some future time T (0ltTltZ) price
expected to fall below maximum lease price (P),
consumers will prefer to lease on annual basis
and wait till time T to buy product - Maximum price consumers willing to pay in this
case at beginning of period 1 less than in case
where price not expected to fall below P until
time period Z - Because of life cycle and technological
obsolescence, producers will decrease price over
time - Consumers must choose when to buy product and
price to pay
13Durable Products
- Example 2 Product has useful life span of X
years but becomes technologically obsolete after
ZltX years - Price in period 2 should decline to PV of lease
payments over remaining life (Z-1 Years) - Similarly for all future prices
- With this pricing strategy, consumers will buy in
period 1 no sales in future time periods - To generate future sales, prices will have to
decline more rapidly and/or rate of technological
obsolescence will have to increase in this
case, consumers will trade off price vs.
technological characteristics of product
14Durable Products
- Leasing more attractive for consumers because
producers best positioned to determine future
value of product - Rate of production per period of time
- Rate of technological obsolescence
- Economies of scale in maintenance
- Producer should assume risk associated with
uncertainty re. resale or terminal value can be
influenced by production and technology decisions
on producer
15Durable Products
- When price signal for quality, price will not
decline - Mercedes example with warranty conditional on
maintenance at authorized MB dealer - Higher price for maintenance
- Reduced uncertainty re. credence product
maintenance service - Higher re-sale value reinforces reputation
- Longer expected life span