Precedex: A New Alternative for Pediatric Sedation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Precedex: A New Alternative for Pediatric Sedation

Description:

Bradycardia not attributable to apneic or desaturation episode. Precedex discontinued. No further ... Known to cause significant hypotension and bradycardia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:901
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: scottka6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Precedex: A New Alternative for Pediatric Sedation


1
Precedex A New Alternative for Pediatric
Sedation?
  • Michelle Alletag, M.D.
  • PL-2, Dept. of Pediatrics
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

2
Abstract
  • Precedex (Dexmedetomidine) is a relatively new
    sedation/analgesic agent. While not yet approved
    for pediatric patients, it is rapidly gaining
    favor in the Pediatric intensive care setting.
    This review is the result of a general search for
    information regarding Precedex, including safety
    and potential efficacy. The study reviewed was
    ineffective in proving safety or efficacy when
    compared with standard regimens of
    benzodiazepines and opioids, and points to the
    need for more research prior to further use.

3
Clinical Background Pt. A
  • A 4 y.o. girl with a hx. of multiple long-term
    intubations 2/2 her presenting illness, and then
    complications from a bone marrow transplant.
  • Significant hx. of sedation difficulties,
    hypertension, and tachycardia.
  • Precedex (Dexmedetomidine) added as a secondary
    agent to current sedation/analgesia regimen.
  • Pt. had rapid and persistent decrease in HR
    (within one hour)
  • No significant improvement in sedation
  • Precedex discontinued after two days

4
Clinical Background Pt. B
  • 2 month old healthy male infant with RSV
    bronchiolitis, intubated for apnea in ER and
    placed on Precedex upon admission to the PICU
    (extubation anticipated within 24-48 hrs).
  • Within 12 hours of Precedex initiation, developed
    acute episode of bradycardia requiring CPR
  • Bradycardia not attributable to apneic or
    desaturation episode
  • Precedex discontinued
  • No further episodes of bradycardia

5
Question
  • Is Precedex a safe and viable alternative to
    standard benzodiazepines for sedation of
    intubated pediatric patients?

6
Search Strategy
  • OVID Search for
  • 1 Precedex limited to pharmacokinetics, side
    effects, and mechanism of action
  • 2 Randomized controlled trials comparing
    Precedex with standard forms of sedation
    (Fentanyl/Versed)

7
The Result
  • Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Sedation During
    Mechanical Ventilation in Infants and Children
    Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam. Southern
    Medical Journal 2004 97(5) 451-455.
  • A prospective, randomized trial to compare the
    efficacy of midazolam versus dexmedetomidine for
    sedation during mechanical ventilation of infants
    and children.

8
First, What Is Precedex?
  • Dexmedetomidine HCl
  • a selective, centrally-acting alpha-2 blocker
  • has sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic effects
  • Inhibits sympathetics
  • activates parasympathetics
  • Rapid distribution (6 minutes) and half-life (2
    hours)
  • Similar to Clonidine (but 800x more specific for
    alpha-2) and Etomidate.
  • FDA-approved for short-term (lt24 hours) sedation
    in adults

9
Is a benzodiazepine alternative even
necessary?
  • Benzodiazepine/Opioid Withdrawal is Common
  • Short-term (inadequate sedation)
  • Long-term (need for methadone/valium can hold up
    discharge)
  • Midazolam can lead to oversedation and thus
    short-term delays in extubation

10
Problems with Precedex
  • Known to cause significant hypotension and
    bradycardia
  • average 20-point drop in both systolic and
    diastolic blood pressure in adults
  • Limited/anecdotal experience only in
    infants/children

11
The Study
  • A prospective, randomized controlled trial
    comparing Precedex and Versed efficacy in
    ventilated children for a 24-hour period only
  • 3 Groups of 10 Patients
  • Versed Control Group (0.22mg/kg/h)
  • Precedex 0.25mcg/kg/h
  • Precedex 0.5mcg/kg/h
  • Level of Sedation assessed based on 3 sedation
    scales
  • Tobias et al. Southern Medical Journal 2004
    97(5) 451-455

12
Sedation Indices
  • Measured Sedation Indices
  • Ramsay Scale (Scale of 1-6 1 being agitated, 6
    most sedated)
  • PICU Sedation Scale (Scale of 1-4)
  • Tracheal Suctioning Score (Scale of 1-6)
  • Bispectral Index Monitor
  • EEG evaluation of state of alertness
  • Number of prn Morphine boluses required to
    maintain adequate sedation
  • Tobias et al. Southern Medical Journal 2004
    97(5) 451-455

13
Results
  • No significant differences between all three
    groups in average score of the sedation scales
  • Ramsey Score of 1 (indicating inadequate
    sedation) assigned at least once in
  • 60 of patients in Midazolam group
  • 40 of patients in the Dexmedetomidine
    0.25mcg/kg/h
  • 20 of patients in the Dexmedetomidine
    0.5mcg/kg/h
  • 83 of patients in either Dexmedetomidine group
    who were assigned a Ramsey score of 1 were lt12
    months of age
  • Tobias et al. Southern Medical Journal 2004
    97(5) 451-455

14
Results cont.
  • Decrease in number of Morphine boluses given in
    both Precedex groups
  • Statistically insignificant in Midazolam v.
    Dexmedetomidine at 0.25mcg/kg/h
  • P 0.02 for Midaz v. Dexmedetomadine at
    0.5mcg/kg/h
  • No significant difference in blood pressures
    among the three groups
  • Significant decrease in heart rates in both
    Dexmedetomidine groups
  • Decrease was statistically significant despite
    one infant being removed from study secondary to
    profound bradycardia)
  • Tobias et al. Southern Medical Journal 2004
    97(5) 451-455

15
Strengths of the Study
  • Evaluated both the sedation effects and the
    cardiovascular side effects of the two
    medications
  • Randomized and double-blinded to eliminate bias
  • Used multiple scores and criteria to evaluate
    sedation

16
Weaknesses
  • Very small cohort (low power). No specific
    hypothesis. Removed a patient from results data
    due to an adverse effect.
  • No age exclusion
  • average age was equivalent at 34 months, but
    with a very broad range
  • No exclusion criteria
  • Postoperative patients may have very different
    sedation/analgesic needs from patients with
    respiratory failure or shock.
  • Drugs for the study provided by Abbott
    Pharmaceuticals.

17
Conclusions
  • Cannot conclude that Precedex is a safe or
    effective alternative to Versed.
  • Side effects concerning enough that further
    studies are indicated prior to routine use.
  • Precedex could be an appropriate agent for a
    select group of PICU patients, but more
    experience is needed.

18
Conclusions Who is a candidate for Precedex?
  • Patients likely to be ventilated for lt24 hours
  • Age gt 1 year (unless further studies can show a
    better safety profile for infants)
  • Stable baseline cardiovascular status
  • No underlying liver disease (hepatically
    metabolized)
  • Post-op heart patients may benefit from the
    negative chronotropic effects and short half-life

19
Further Research Potential
  • A randomized controlled trial using a much larger
    cohort
  • A study that includes infants only (Case Reports
    of adverse effects are mostly in kids 12 mos. or
    younger)
  • A randomized controlled trial evaluating time to
    extubation in dexmedetomidine v. midazolam (since
    we really only have anecdotal evidence)

20
References
  • Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Sedation During
    Mechanical Ventilation in Infants and Children
    Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam. Southern
    Medical Journal 2004 97(5) 451-455.
  • Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Initial Experience
    with Dexmedetomidine in Paediatric-Aged Patients.
    Paediatric Anesthesia 2002 12 171-175.
  • Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Additional Experience
    with Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients.
    Southern Medical Journal 2003 96 871-875.
  • Petroz Guy C, et. al. A Phase I, Two-Center
    Study of the Pharmacokinetics and
    Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine in Children.
    Anesthesiology 2006 105(6) 1098-1110.
  • Tobias Joseph D. Dexmedetomidine Applications
    in Pediatric Critical Care and Pediatric
    Anesthesiology. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
    2007 8(2) 1-17.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com