Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers

Description:

3% of large property damage losses are caused by failures in process towers. ... Impurities not considered in design, exothermic reaction destroys tower - Seadrift ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:185
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: dickha
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers


1
Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers
  • Dick Hawrelak
  • Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO

2
Introduction
  • 3 of large property damage losses are caused by
    failures in process towers.
  • Average Trended Loss was 53.8MM, the largest of
    all unit operations.

3
Distillation Tower Problems
  • The following list of problems have been drawn
    from my personal experience as a design engineer
    with Dow Chemical for 33 years (1960 - 1993).

4
Poor Mass Balances
  • Normal mass balance.
  • Start-up, shut down or upset.
  • Re-run of off-spec material.

5
Tower Variables
  • Poor understanding of tower variables, reflux,
    downcomers, reboilers, condensers.
  • VLE data can be confusing and misleading during
    design.
  • Tower configuration not the best - Seadrift tower
    explosion kills one operator.

6
Tower Controls
  • Process controls not adequate for upset
    conditions.
  • Often dual level controls are required on bottoms
    of towers.

7
Reboilers
  • Poor reboiler selection.
  • High rate of fouling due to high steam
    temperatures.
  • Reboiler stall due to loss of level in tower -
    Seadrift tower explosion.
  • Reboiler lines too small and choke recirculation.

8
Condensers
  • Pressure drops higher than design due to fouling.
  • Hydrates form and plug condenser.
  • Entrainment from tower not considered in design.
  • Inerts blanket condenser, failure to remove heat
    cause PSVs to blow.

9
VCM Upset
10
VCM Process
11
VCM mb
12
HCL Dispersion
13
VCM Dispersion
14
Mechanical Design of Tall Towers
  • Tower shell thickness not suitable to prevent
    sway in high winds, tower topples.

15
Impurities In Tower Feed
  • Impurities not considered in design, exothermic
    reaction destroys tower - Seadrift

16
Flammable Inventory
  • Designers specify excessive inventory in reflux
    drum when tower logistics not well understood.
  • Large bottoms inventory may promote formation of
    unwanted polymerization products.

17
Tower Operation at Low Rates
  • Ballast tray units experience high rate of wear
    due to low unit reference. Broken valves plug
    downcomers or end up in pump suction causing
    further upsets.

18
Vacuum Operation
  • Designers too optimistic about air leakage.
    Vacuum pump or steam jets too small to pull
    required vacuum.
  • Poor management of pressure drop.

19
Recessed Sumps On Trays
  • Vendors often specify recessed sumps to save 6
    inches on tower diameter.
  • Recessed sumps are perfect traps to collect
    solids and plug downcomers.

20
Packed Towers
  • Poor vapor and liquid distribution affects HETP.
    Dow wins 3MM lawsuit.
  • Vendors predict high HETP over wide range of
    flow. Customers beware.
  • Poor rangeability in packed tower operation.

21
Data Collection
  • Grab samples not suitable to check tower
    performance.
  • Require sample range over 24 hour period.
  • Troubleshooting difficult because of poor
    instrumentation.

22
Tower Internals
  • Flashing tower feeds not considered in feed tray
    design.
  • Feed distributors do not work.
  • Demisters often required but are ignored.
  • Vortex breakers omitted in tower bottoms.

23
Tower Optimization
  • Select a process sequence.
  • Mass balances to match product specs.
  • Thermal condition of the feed.
  • Minimum reflux ratio.
  • Minimum no. of trays.
  • No. trays versus reflux ratio.

24
Optimization Contd
  • Feed tray location.
  • Tray efficiency.
  • Valve tray tower design.
  • Select tower internals.
  • Repeat optimization for a packed tower.

25
UC Configuration
26
Dow Configuration
27
Previous Exam Problem
  • The students were presented a paper on Union
    Carbides Seadrift, Texas, EO tower explosion.
    They were asked to comment on the explosion with
    respect to what they had learned in this safety
    course.

28
Other Possible Exam Questions
  • Why do designers often specify abnormally large
    flammable inventory in the reflux drum?
  • Why should the designer minimize the reboiler
    steam temperature in a flammable distillation
    tower?
  • What are the main problems with packed towers?

29
Summary
  • This short list is indicative of some of the
    problems caused by poor engineering discipline in
    distillation tower design.
  • Recommend you obtain a copy of the Chemical Plant
    Design programs and follow the procedures built
    into the spreadsheets.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com