Killer Whale Vocal Response to Vessel Traffic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Killer Whale Vocal Response to Vessel Traffic

Description:

Southern resident killer whales (SRKW) declared 'depleted' under the Marine ... We used a hydrophone, amplifier and digital recorder to receive and record the sounds. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: celiab9
Learn more at: http://www.beamreach.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Killer Whale Vocal Response to Vessel Traffic


1
Killer Whale Vocal Response to Vessel Traffic
  • Celia Barroso
  • Beam Reach Marine Science and Sustainability
    School
  • Fall 2005
  • California State University, Long Beach
  • Long Beach, California

2
  • Southern resident killer whales (SRKW) declared
    depleted under the Marine Mammal Protection Act
  • Possible causes according to NOAA/NMFS
    Conservation Plan
  • Pollutants/Contaminants (c.f. PCB, DDT)
  • Decreased prey availability
  • Anthropogenic noise pollution

3
Population Structure and Communication
  • Different pods (J-pod, K-pod, and L-pod)
  • Different dialects
  • Pod specific calls (Ford, 1990)
  • S1 (J-pod, K-pod)
  • S16 (K-pod, L-pod)
  • S19 (L-pod)
  • Dominant calls

4
Research that sparked my curiosity
  • Vessel traffic has increased five fold over
    between 1990 and 2000 (Foote et. al., 2004)
  • During the period of 2001-2003 all pods exhibited
    a significant (15) increase in call duration in
    the presence of whale-watching vessels.

5
My questions
  • Do SRKWs exhibit short-term changes in call
    duration in response to daily exposure to vessel
    noise?
  • Do they modify their calls to avoid masking by
    boat noise?
  • Examples motor , ship , quiet

6
How did I conduct my experiment?
  • I attempted to recreate Andrew Footes and
    Richard Osbournes published research over a
    shorter time scale.
  • We used a hydrophone, amplifier and digital
    recorder to receive and record the sounds.
  • Viewed spectrograms of S1, S16, and S19

7
How did I conduct my experiment?
  • Calculated call duration of the second harmonics
    for S1 and S16 calls, the third harmonic for S19
    high frequency component and fundamental for low
    frequency component

S1
S19 Low
S19 High
S16
8
What did I find?
  • The mean I calculated for S16 calls compares to
    the mean S16 call published by Foote et. al.
  • I did not record S16 or S19 calls that were
    quantifiable using my methods when vessels were
    absent

9
What did I find?
  • Average S1 call duration in the presence of
    vessels is 1.17s and 1.105s in the absence of
    vessel noise.

10
What did I find?
  • No trends

11
Problems and conclusions
  • I, unlike Foote et al., was generally unable to
    distinguish which pod I was listening to
  • More observations are needed
  • Observations during peak whale-watching season
  • 24hr observations
  • Observations regarding activities and call
    duration
  • Perhaps SRKWs dont modify their calls in
    response to vessel noise

12
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com