Efficiency in Islamic Banking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Efficiency in Islamic Banking

Description:

Al-Jarrah and Molyneux (2003) use the stochastic frontier approach, and estimate ... Al-Jarrah and Molyneux (2003) extend their analysis by also estimating both ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1086
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: worl183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Efficiency in Islamic Banking


1
Efficiency in Islamic Banking
  • Dr Khaled A. Hussein
  • Islamic Research and Training Institute
  • Islamic Development Bank
  • PO Box 9201, Jeddah 21413
  • Saudi Arabia

2
Why is banking efficiency important?
  • Banking efficiency is important at the macro
    and micro levels.

3
  • Financial sector as a whole plays a key role in
    allocating the economys financial resources.
  • In order to allocate resources effectively,
    banks should be sound and efficient.

4
  • Efficient banking system helps to increase the
    effectiveness of the macroeconomic policies.

5
  • Bank efficiency is a socially optimal target
    since it reduces the average cost of financial
    transactions and therefore enhance the societys
    welfare.

6
  • Financial institutions used to enjoy local
    oligopolies and therefore make rewarding profits,
    but such advantages are shrinking due to growth
    in competition.
  • Due to the growth of competition, bank
    management is interested in enhancing efficiency.
  • Regulatory authority has to assess the
    efficiency of the banking sector before going
    global.

7
Methods to measure banking efficiency
  • Financial ratios approach
  • Examine financial ratios such as
  • ROE, ROA, capital asset ratio, growth rate of
    total revenue, cost/income ratio

8
Econometric Procedure
  • The efficiency in financial institutions can be
    estimated using either
  • Parametric methods (such as the stochastic
    frontier analysis, the thick frontier approach,
    and the distribution-free approach)
  • Non-parametric techniques (such as data
    envelopment analysis and free disposable hull
    analysis).

9
  • Berger and Humphrey (1997) argue that it is not
    possible to determine which of the two major
    approaches dominates the other
  • Berger, A. and D. Humphrey, (1997), Efficiency
    of Financial Institutions International Survey
    and Directions for Future Research, European
    Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175-212.

10
The Efficiency Concepts
  • Cost and profit efficiency are the most
    important economic efficiency concepts.

11
The cost efficiency
  • Cost efficiency gives a measure of how close a
    banks cost to the best practice banks cost that
    produces the same bundle of output under the same
    conditions.

12
  • Costs, C, depend upon prices of inputs, P, the
    quantities of outputs, Q, random error, v, and
    cost inefficiency, u.
  • The cost function can be specified as following
  • C f (Q, P, v, u)

13
Profit Efficiency
  • Efficiency is measured by how close a bank comes
    to earning maximum profit given its output level.

14
  • The profit function employs banks profits as
    the dependent variable and the same explanatory
    variables as in the cost function.
  • The profit efficiency function is specified as
    following
  • p f (Q, P, v, u)

15
  • The translog model is the most popular form in
    the literature.
  • The translog model of the profit efficiency in
    can be written as following

16
Variables
  • Dependent variable
  • Profit before taxes

17
The explanatory variables
  • Input prices
  • P1 is the price of labour and is calculated as
    total salaries and staff expenses over full time
    number of staff

18
  • P2 is the price of fund which is measured as
    interest expenses over time and saving deposits,
  • Note that in case of Islamic banks interest
    expenses are replaced with profits distributed to
    depositors.

19
  • P3 is the price of physical capital which is
    equal to depreciation over fixed capital and
    investment in leasing.
  • In case of Islamic banks the depreciation value
    should include the depreciation in physical
    capital that bought for leasing.
  • Failure to take into account this fact will lead
    to bias in the efficiency estimates.

20
  • One of the main challenges is to identify banks
    level of outputs
  • The products of the Islamic banks are different
    from their conventional counterparts.

21
  • In case of conventional banks, products can be
    grouped as following
  • short term debt (treasury bills, trading bonds,
    short term loans and advances, and deposits at
    other financial institutions that mature within
    one year)
  • long term debt (non trading bonds, and medium
    long term loans),
  • investments (securities and other investments).

22
  • Following the same criteria, Islamic banking
    products can be classified into
  • short term debt includes murabaha, salam, and
    qard fund.
  • Long term debt includes sukuk, leasing, and
    istisna.
  • Investments consist of securities, mudaraba,
    musharaka, and investment in properties and
    managed funds.

23
  • The inclusion of the off-balance sheet items as
    an output is of great importance particularly to
    Islamic investment banks where restricted
    investment accounts are not recorded in the
    balance sheet and considered as off-balance sheet
    items.

24
Empirical Findings
  • Al-Shammari (2003) uses the translog stochastic
    cost and alternative profit frontier approaches
    to estimate bank efficiency in GCC countries and
    compare Islamic bank efficiency with other types
    of banks.
  • See Tables 6.1 , 6.2 , 6.3 pp. 13-15

25
  • Al-Jarrah and Molyneux (2003) use the stochastic
    frontier approach, and estimate bank cost and
    profit efficiency estimates for banks operating
    in Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
  • Table 6.4 shows that the average cost efficiency
    for different types of banks ranged from 93 for
    investment banks to 98 for Islamic banks.

26
  • Al-Jarrah and Molyneux (2003) extend their
    analysis by also estimating both standard and
    alternative profit efficiency for their sample of
    banks.
  • See Table 6.5 and 6.6

27
  • El-Gamal and Inanoglu (2002) used the stochastic
    cost frontier approach to estimate the cost
    efficiency of Turkish banks over the period 1990
    to 2000.
  • The study compared the cost efficiencies of 49
    conventional banks with four Islamic special
    finance houses (SFHs).

28
Conclusions
  • Islamic banking is more efficient organisation
    form than other types of banking organisations.
    WHY?
  • The consensus of opinion seems to reveal
    substantial efficiency advantages, it is not
    absolutely clear why these exist some put it
    down to lower funding costs and others to lower
    loan-losses.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com