Dr Faith Gibson, Lecturer in Childrens Cancer Nursing Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr Faith Gibson, Lecturer in Childrens Cancer Nursing Research

Description:

To be able to describe the advantages and disadvantages of using focus groups. ... Honouring the participant and the method. Ensuring quality and reporting back ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: rcn7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr Faith Gibson, Lecturer in Childrens Cancer Nursing Research


1
Using Focus Groups with Children and Young People
  • Dr Faith Gibson, Lecturer in Childrens Cancer
    Nursing Research
  • Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street
    Hospital
  • for Children NHS Trust, London

2
Learning outcomes
  • To be able to describe the advantages and
    disadvantages of using focus groups.
  • To be able to describe the steps taken when
    planning and running a focus group.
  • To be able to highlight the particular techniques
    used when working with children and young people
    in focus groups.
  • To be able to outline the ethical issues
    involving children and young people in focus
    groups.
  • To summarize approaches to analysis and reporting
    of focus group data.

3
Overview of the Session (90 minutes)
  • Activity-ice breaker
  • Presentation Theory and practice of focus
    groups
  • Activity
  • Presentation Running a focus group
  • Closing comments

4
Ice Breaker
5
My experience.your experience????
  • Identifying dimensions of the role of the CNS
  • Exploring the role of nurses in day care
  • Identifying competencies of general and
    specialist nurses
  • Exploring fatigue with teenagers
  • Listening to children and young peoples views of
    their cancer experience
  • Exploring experiences with young people during
    the diagnostic period

6
A focus group is.
  • A carefully planned discussion
  • Designed to obtain perceptions
  • On a defined area of interest
  • In a permissive non-threatening environment
  • Conducted with approximately 7-10 people
  • By a skilled interviewer
  • To share ideas and perceptions
  • In which group members influence each other by
    responding to ideas and comments in the discussion

7
The story behind their use
  • Origins traced back to 1920s
  • Used then to develop survey instruments
  • Developed in response to general dissatisfaction
    with interviews
  • Became popular and developed strongly as a
    research technique for market research
  • Adopted for party political research
  • Well established as a mainstream method across
    all fields of social and educational research
  • In health care seen increase in use in last 10
    years

8
Characteristics.
  • Involve people small enough to share insights,
    large enough to provide diversity
  • Conducted in a series to detect patterns and
    trends across groups
  • Composed of people who are similar defined by
    the study
  • Used to produce research data differs from other
    group interactions
  • Make use of qualitative data participants
    influence each other like in real life as opposed
    to interviews
  • Have a focussed discussion carefully
    predetermined and sequenced

9
Some common myths.
  • Cheap and quick
  • Require moderators with highly developed
    professional skills
  • Must consist of strangers
  • Not used to discuss sensitive topics
  • Tend to produce conformity
  • Are a more natural means of collecting data
  • Should not be used for decision making
  • Must be validated by other methods

10
Why focus groups with children/young people
  • Create a safer peer environment
  • Replicate the type of small group setting similar
    to the classroom
  • May help to re-dress the power imbalance
  • May be encouraged to give their opinions when
    they hear others
  • Memory may be jogged by others contributions
  • Acknowledges participants as experts
  • Greater involvement in the research process

11
Where to start.
  • Framing your research question
  • Detailing outcomes of the research
  • Agreeing sample and setting
  • Deciding approaches to data collection
  • Identifying data analysis techniques

12
Early planning process.
  • Number of sessions practical and substantive
    issues considered
  • Time and place knowledge of participants to
    increase uptake
  • Style and format standardise for coverage and
    analysis
  • Recording tools tape, video, group activities,
    note taking
  • Analysis most challenging aspect where less has
    been written
  • Pilot process and questions

13
Working within an ethical framework
  • Duties
  • Rights
  • Benefits/harm
  • Risk of distress
  • Risks to children from participating- benefits to
    children in the future
  • Respect for privacy and confidentiality, use of
    quotes
  • Trust
  • Understanding
  • Keeping children safe
  • Refer to checklists, e.g. NCB,
  • RCPCH, MRC

14
Post it pyramids
15
Group composition factors
  • Age dictates size of group, average 5-8
  • Participants in a group should be within two-year
    age span
  • Used with children over 6 years
  • Single-sex/mixed sex
  • Known/unknown
  • Homogenous/heterogeneous
  • Last 45 mins-90 mins
  • Research question will influence many factors

16
Location/seating
  • Familiarity balanced against suitability
  • Noise levels and distractions
  • Seating arrangements, floor, seated in circle
    with moderator, with/without table
  • Eye contact
  • Choice of seating

17
The Moderator
  • Make the group feel comfortable and at ease
  • Set themselves apart from other authority
    figures
  • Matching moderator to the group
  • Allowing participants to influence the agenda
  • Keep discussions focused on the topic
  • Ensure all participants have an opportunity to
    contribute
  • Remain mindful of non-verbal signs and
    fatigue/boredom
  • Be aware of/note group dynamics
  • Enhance the clarity of participants contributions

18
Introducing the group
  • Standard statement
  • Format and nature of the group discussion
  • Confidentiality, what this means
  • Ground rules
  • Recording, tape/video
  • Role of assistant moderator
  • The opening topic, sequencing questions
  • Discussion
  • Ending the discussion
  • Summary, concluding for the group and the
    individual

19
Conducting the discussion..
  • Flexibility or structure
  • Probing
  • Noting non-verbal language
  • Creating space for everyone to contribute
  • Addressing dominant participants
  • Drawing out reticent participants
  • Avoiding simultaneous dialogue
  • Value interactions, recognise cannot follow every
    point raised
  • Exploring emerging issues, diversity of view
  • Challenging social norms and apparent consensus

20
Using activities
  • Ice-breaker
  • Age-specific activities, designed for the purpose
  • Brainstorming
  • Sentence completion
  • Visual prompts
  • Vignettes
  • Fantasy wishes
  • And
  • Emphasise participation

21
Analysing data
  • Mechanical
  • Transcript, tape, notes, observation based
  • Revise decision if necessary
  • Diagram of seating arrangements
  • De-brief immediately after and take notes
  • Organize data
  • Interpretative
  • Review tapes, transcripts, and notes look for
    emerging themes and develop coding categories
  • Construct overview grid
  • Making group comparisons
  • Reliability and members check

22
Threats to quality.
  • Clarity of purpose
  • Appropriate environment
  • Sufficient resources
  • Appropriate participants
  • Recruitment and scheduling of sessions
  • Skilful moderator
  • Effective questions
  • Careful data handling
  • Systematic and verifiable analysis
  • Appropriate presentation
  • Honouring the participant and the method

23
Ensuring quality and reporting back
  • Detail participants and the context in which
    views were given
  • True representation of findings
  • Face validity
  • Convergent validity confirmed by future
    behaviours, experiences or events?
  • Feedback, written, user forum, conferences,
    publication
  • Influencing practice

24
In summary.
  • Preparation and planning ensures success
  • Not to be taken on as an easy option
  • Research question influences methods
  • Group composition, format, etc all need
    considerable thought
  • Rigour at all stages is crucial
  • And
  • Valuable approach to gathering valid and reliable
    data directly with children and young people

25
Secret Box
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com