SelfPerception and Temperament Type of Gifted Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

SelfPerception and Temperament Type of Gifted Children

Description:

INFP. SJ Temperament Types. ISTJ. ESFJ. ESTJ. ISFJ. NT Temperament Types. INTJ ... ISTJ, ISFJ, INFJ, INTJ, ISTP, ISFP, INFP, INTP, ESTP, ESFP, ENFP, ENTP,ESTJ, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:484
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: debratr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SelfPerception and Temperament Type of Gifted Children


1
Self-Perception and Temperament Type of Gifted
Children Youth
  • Lamar University
  • Education Research Conference
  • March 27 28, 2008
  • Presented by
  • Debra A. Troxclair, Ph.D.
  • University of Louisiana at Monroe
  • College of Education and Human Development
  • Curriculum Instruction Dept.
  • 700 University Blvd. Strauss 233
  • 318-342-1279 (O)
  • troxclair_at_ulm.edu
  • http//www.ulm.edu/troxclair/2008

2
Self-concept Achievement of Gifted
  • Do gifted individuals have better self-concepts
    than non-gifted individuals?
  • If they do, why?
  • If they dont, why not?

3
Introduction
4
The debate???
  • High self-concept vs. Low self-concept
  • Of
  • Gifted

5
What about effects of personality on self-concept?
  • Gifted children have social and emotional
    developmental needs because of variations in
    facets of development and may have difficulties
    resulting from a lack of awareness and acceptance
    of their personality type.

6
Self-Perception, Temperament Type, Achievement,
Grade Level, and Gender in Intellectually Gifted
Youth

7
How is the self-perception of a gifted child
influenced by .
  • Personality type (specifically extroversion/introv
    ersion)
  • Academic achievement
  • Gender
  • Grade level

8
Performance in school is strongly influenced by
the ways they think and feel about themselves
(Lewis, 1994).
  • Gifted children have special needs because of
    their unique, differentiating characteristics
  • Large accumulation of information about emotions
    that has not been brought to awareness
  • Being unusually sensitive to the expectations and
    feelings of others
  • Having a heightened self-awareness accompanied by
    feelings of being different
  • Experiencing early development of an inner locus
    of control and satisfaction
  • Being strongly motivated towards
    self-actualization

9
Background and Importance of the Study
10
Needs of gifted individuals
  • Needs related to these differentiating
    characteristics include a need to
  • Identify their own and others perceptual filters
    and defense systems
  • Learn to clarify the expectations of others
  • Assert their own needs and feelings
    non-defensively
  • Share the self with others for
    self-clarification
  • Confront and interact with the value systems of
    others
  • Learn to set realistic goals and to accept
    setbacks as part of the learning process
  • Follow divergent paths and pursue strong
    interests
  • Acquire help in understanding the demands of
    self-actualization

11
Type theory help gifted students learn
affectively and cognitively
  • Cognitive development can be affected by type
    theory as it offers a framework for structuring
    teaching and learning activities
  • Personality type affects preferences for teaching
    and learning
  • There is a relationship between psychological
    type and subject matter preferences that may play
    a part in an individuals level of achievement in
    a particular subject area.
  • Underachievement occurs more often due to a
    mismatch of type between teacher and students
    than to poor self-concept (Barger Hoover, 1984)

12
Statement of the Problem
13
  • The purpose of the study was to discover the
    relationships between
  • Self-Perception
  • as related to
  • Temperament type (Extroversion/Introversion)
  • Achievement
  • Grade Level
  • Gender

14
Harters Model of Self-Concept
  • Self concept
  • The image we hold of ourselves (Hoge Renzulli)
  • Attitudes, feelings, and knowledge about our
    abilities, skills, appearnace, and social
    acceptability (Byrne, as cited in Hoge
    Renzulli)
  • Dimensions of self-concept
  • Cognitive
  • Perceptual
  • Affective
  • Evaluative or self-esteem dimension

15
Streins Hierarchy of Self-Concept
  • Self-perception
  • Descriptive
  • Emphasis on behaviors instead of feelings
  • Self-acceptance
  • Self-confidence
  • Self-regard

Evaluative
16
Self-Concept Models
  • Nomothetic ---gt Global Self-Worth
  • Hierarchical
  • Multi-dimensional view of self-concept

17
Self-Perception
Self-perception The way children perceive their
competence and self-adequacy across specific
domains as measured by the Harter
Self-Perception Profile for Children (HSPPC)
18
HSPPC .
19
Jungs Personality Type
  • Temperament Type
  • Signature of ones actions that makes one
    recognizably his/her own as measured by the
    Murphy-Meisgeier Type Indicator for Children
    (MMTIC)

20
NF Temperament Types
21
SJ Temperament Types
22
NT Temperament Types
23
SP Temperament Type
24
The Extrovert/Introvert Dimension
  • Extraverts
  • Seek external activity
  • Change
  • Interaction in order to create the energy needed
    to guide themselves through the day
  • Get energy by initiating activity in the
    environment
  • Need to externalize thoughts and ideas aloud
  • Thrive on seeking stimulus from their surroundings
  • Introverts
  • Energy is derived and revitalized by reflecting
    upon stimulus received from their surroundings
  • Do not feel the need to externalize thoughts or
    ideas until pressure to communicate with others
    requires it
  • Feels ideas and thoughts are satisfying in and of
    themselves
  • Energy comes from the peace of their internal
    garden rather than from outside stimuli energy
    is within themselves
  • They expend their energy by painting an internal
    picture of what is real

25
Method
26
Data Collection
Self-Perception
HSPCC May 1997
Temperament Type
MMTIC May 1997
California Achievement Test Scores from Spring
1996 May 1997
Achievement Data
Gender/Grade Level
Demographics section of MMTIC May 1997
27
Additional information
  • Participation was voluntary in accordance with
    all school district policy
  • Administration of the instruments was
    counterbalanced the MMTIC was administered first
    at one schools followed by the HSPPC. At the next
    school the order of admissions was reversed
  • It took about 1 hour to 1 hour 15 minutes to
    complete the instruments

28
The Murphy Meisgeier Type Indicator for Children
  • 70 item self-report measure respondent is asked
    to choose a preferred response from 2 choices,
    neither of which is right or wrong
  • The four dimensions of personality type were
    assessed by this instrument
  • SN (Sensing iNtuiting)
  • TF (Thinking Feeling)
  • JP (Judging Perceiving)
  • EI (Extroversion Introversion)
  • Responses were made by selecting the a or b
    choice on a hand-scorable answer sheet and are
    recorded as a standard four letter code, one
    letter from each of the four pairs (SN, TF, JP,
    or EI) for a total of 16 possible personality
    types. Those types are ISTJ, ISFJ, INFJ, INTJ,
    ISTP, ISFP, INFP, INTP, ESTP, ESFP, ENFP,
    ENTP,ESTJ, ESPJ ENFJ, AND ENTJ)

29
More on MMTIC
  • Content validity reported by 21 members of the
    Association of Psychological Type
  • Construct validity reported with
  • Childrens Personality Questionnaire,
  • the Learning Preferences Inventory,
  • and the Learning Pattern Assessment

30
More on MMTIC
  • Reliability
  • Internal consistency of discriminant function
  • Spearman-Brown Split-hal reliabilty for
    discriminant function scores
  • EI .62 .65
  • SN .68 .63
  • TF .65 .64
  • JP .72 .75
  • Pearson Test-retest reliability
  • Preference Classifications (gamma) and
    Discriminant Function Scores (Pearson product
    moment correlation)
  • EI .71 .61
  • SN .75 .69
  • TF .64 .58
  • JP .71 .68

31
The Harter Self-Perception Profile for Children
  • 36 item paper and pencil instrument which has
    responses devised in a structured alternative
    format. This means the student is first asked to
    decide which kind of child is most like him or
    hen and then is asked if this is only sort of
    true for him/her, or is really true for him/her
  • Responses are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 where
    1 indicates a low perception of confidence and a
    score of 4 reflects a high perceived competence
  • Validity
  • Internal consistency (Coefficient alpha) .71 -
    .86
  • Reliability
  • Test-retest coefficient
  • .70 to .87 after 3 months
  • .69 to .89 after 9 months

32
Hypotheses, Research Design Results
33
Hypotheses
  • H1 There is a significant relationship between
    the criterion variable of temperament type and
    the composite set of predictor variables of
    self-perception, the E/I dimension, academic
    achievement, gender, and grade level in selected
    intellectually gifted students in grades 4
    through 8.
  • MDA was used to test this hypothesis
  • Results Accepted There was a low to moderate
    significant relationship with temperament type
    and the predictor variables and that these
    variables were highly intercorrelated.

34
Hypotheses
  • H6 The relationship between self-perception and
    the independent variables of grade level, gender,
    academic achievement, and the E/I dimension
    significantly differ according to temperament
    type
  • MANOVA procedure was used
  • Results Accepted
  • The following significant differences were found
    between
  • NF and SJ
  • NF and Undecided
  • NT and SJ
  • NT and Undecided
  • SJ and SP
  • Undecided and SP
  • The largest difference was found between the SP
    and the Undecided groups and the smallest
    difference was between the NT and NF groups.

35
Hypotheses
  • H7 There is a significant difference between
    temperament type and the E/I dimension on the
    cirterion varialbe of self-perception
  • MANOVA method was used
  • Results Hypothesis 7 was accepted for the E/I
    dimension and rejected for the temperament type
    variable.
  • Extraverts scored significantly difference from
    introverts and the undecided group on athletic
    competence
  • The Undecided group scored significantly
    different from introverts on the social
    acceptable scale of self-perceptions

36
Hypotheses
  • H8 There is a significant interaction between
    the variables of temperament type, the E/I
    dimension, and academic achievement on the
    criterion varialbe of self-perception.
  • MANOVA method was used
  • Results rejected
  • While there was no significant interaction among
    any of the three variables of the E/I dimension,
    temperament type, and achievement, the
    self-perception means differed according to the
    E/I dimension
  • The extravert group mean was significantly higher
    than both the introvert and undecided groups on
    athletic competence
  • The extravert group mean was significantly higher
    than the introvert and undecided groups on social
    acceptance.

37
Hypotheses
  • H10 There is a significant interaction between
    males and females across grade levels on the
    criterion variable of self-perception.
  • MANOVA method was used
  • Results rejected
  • While there was no significant interaction found
    between the composite set of gender and grade
    level on self-perception, there was signifcant
    interaction between grade level and the physical
    appearance scale and between gender and athletic
    competence, physical appearance, and behavioral
    conduct self-perception.
  • Males scored significantly higher than females on
    athletic competence, physical appearance scales
  • Females scored significantly higher than males on
    behavioral conduct scale
  • Fifth graders scored higher on the physical
    appearance scale than did subjects in all other
    grade levels.

38
Discussion
39
  • Within this study, a low to moderate significant
    relationship was found between temperament type
    and the composite set of variables of
    self-perception, the E/I dimension of personality
    type, academic achievement, gender, and grade
    level. However, there were no significant
    independent relationships between temperament
    type and each of the variables. These variables
    were highly intercorrelated.

40
  • The relationship between the composite set of
    independent varialbes of grade level, gender,
    academic achievement, and the E/I dimension
    significantly differed according to temperament
    type. These significant differences were found
    for the NF and SJ types. Additionally, 5 out of
    the 6 other significant differnces found included
    those students with the N dimension in their
    temperament types.
  • Consistent with Myers McCaulleys findings (as
    cited in Bireley, 1991) which link the gifted
    childs preference for the N domain to his/her
    feelings of being different. (Olszewshi-Kubilius
    Kulieke, 1989, also found gifted 7 to 9th
    graders to be N males were NT and females for NF

41
  • Gifted children are more likely to be I
    (Gallagher, Geiger, Myers McCaulley)
  • Students in this present study were extraverts
    (56.5) rather than intraverts (25.3) or
    Undecided (18.27) with no significant
    differences relative to gender.
  • Self-perception means for the variables of
    athletic competence and social acceptance
    significantly differed according to the E/I
    dimension
  • Es scored higher than Is and Undecideds on
    athletci competence
  • Undecided groups scored significantly higher than
    introverts on the social acceptance scale of
    self-perception.
  • Gender was significantly related to
    self-perception scales of athletic competence,
    physical appearance, and behavioral conduct.
  • Findings concurred with Hoge and McSheffrey for
    athletic competence and physical appearance and
    with Li regarding physical appearnance

42
  • Self-perception means for variables of athletic
    competence and social interaction between grade
    level and physical appearance
  • Fifth graders scored significantly higher than
    did subjects in the remaining grades
  • Inconsistent with Lis findings who reported that
    4th graders were more positive in perception of
    their physical appearance.

43
Recommendations
44
  • Examine the relationship between temperament type
    and
  • experience or length of time in gifted programs,
  • self-actualization,
  • locus of control,
  • leadership,
  • thinicity,
  • overexciteabilities

45
  • Longitudinal studies of gifted individuals would
    be useful to reveal if personality/temperament
    type and self-perception change or maintain over
    time
  • Studying personality type in atypical populations
    of gifted individuals (gt/ld, underachievers,
    artistically talented/creative gt students) and
    comparing/contrasting those students with more
    typical gifted students would add insight into
    how those students function
  • Studies investigating the effects of matching
    teachers of the gifted and their students
    according to personality type on achievement and
    self-perception
  • Development of an affective curriculum about
    personality type
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com