Special Moral Demands of Criminal Justice and Moral Foundations of Criminal Guilt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Special Moral Demands of Criminal Justice and Moral Foundations of Criminal Guilt

Description:

... mean when we say, 'Not every act regarded as immoral by the dominant community ... and no act should be made criminal if it is not viewed as immoral. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:220
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: chris5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Special Moral Demands of Criminal Justice and Moral Foundations of Criminal Guilt


1
Special Moral Demands of Criminal
JusticeandMoral Foundations of Criminal Guilt
2
Why Be Moral?
  • Reasons for morality.
  • Self-Interest
  • Happiness (Making self and others happy)
  • Self-Respect
  • Self-Worth (Rising above desires)
  • Sense of Community (Sociality)

3
Why Be Moral?
  • When should a person responsible to society for
    acts considered to be criminal?
  • What is the relationship between law and moral
    values?
  • Should unjust or oppressive social conditions
    reduce criminal responsibility?

4
Why Be Moral?
  • What role should moral concepts play in CJ?
  • Two Main Perspectives
  • 1. Achieving social order outweighs concerns for
    social justice.
  • 2. CJ system goals must be achieved within
    constraints of social justice.

5
Why Be Moral?
  • First Perspective
  • 1. Achieving social order outweighs concerns for
    social justice.
  • Suggests that criminal law impose severe
    punishments in order to deter others from illegal
    activity.
  • Law As External Constraint Thesis

6
Why Be Moral?
  • Second Perspective
  • 2. CJ system goals must be achieved within
    constraints of social justice.
  • Suggests that the moral foundation of order is
    tenuous at best when people obey the law because
    they fear consequences of illegal behavior.
  • Law As Internal Constraint Concept

7
Why Be Moral?
  • A violent order is disorder. Wallace Stevens

8
Why Be Moral?
  • Law As External Constraint Thesis
  • The ends justify the means
  • Law As Internal Constraint Concept
  • If the CJ system does not consistently work
    equally to the benefit of all members of society,
    the CJ system loses its differentiation from
    crime.

9
Why Be Moral?
  • A working definition of morality.
  • Concept of Reciprocal Decency
  • Do unto others as you would have others do unto
    you.

10
Why Be Moral?
  • What do we mean when we say, Not every act
    regarded as immoral by the dominant community
    should be made criminal, and no act should be
    made criminal if it is not viewed as immoral.

11
Why Be Moral?
  • What do we mean when we say, Not every act
    regarded as immoral by the dominant community
    should be made criminal, and no act should be
    made criminal if it is not viewed as immoral.
  • The conduct in question must be viewed by society
    as a moral wrong and a breach of some minimum
    condition of social existence.

12
Why Be Moral?
  • The conduct in question must be viewed by society
    as a moral wrong and a breach of some minimum
    condition of social existence.
  • This suggests that the criminal code should
    define only minimum conditions of individual
    responsibility to other members of society.

13
Why Be Moral?
  • Should the law consider limitations in capacity
    for choosing right from wrong?

14
Why Be Moral?
  • Should the law consider limitations in capacity
    for choosing right from wrong?
  • What about these limitations?
  • Education
  • Low Intelligence
  • Impulse Control Disorders
  • Others

15
Why Be Moral?
  • Can there be equal justice when the kind of trial
    a person gets depends on the amount of money, or
    family influence, that they have?
  • What are the implications of this for all
    society?

16
Why Be Moral?
  • Recall Law As External Constraint Theory
  • 1. Achieving social order outweighs concerns for
    social justice.
  • Suggests that criminal law impose severe
    punishments in order to deter others from illegal
    activity.
  • Justifications
  • Society cannot afford social justice.
  • We do not know with certainty what causes crime.
  • It is not cost effective to fight crime by social
    reform.

17
Why Be Moral?
  • Choices in Addressing the Crime Problem.
  • The choice is goals.
  • Repressive Order, or
  • Moral Order
  • David Bazelon, Federal Appeals Court Judge

18
Break
  • Some Food For Thought
  • Anything worth having is worth working for.
  • Physical courage is more abundant that moral
    courage.
  • If we are not part of the solution, we are part
    of the problem.

19
Social Contract Theory
  • What is the relationship between governmental
    protection and the citizens responsibility to
    obey the law?
  • What are the legitimate limits of power for the
    state to preserve the peace?
  • What is political obligation if people are free
    to decide whether the state is doing its job?

20
Social Contract Theory
  • Basic Premise One of the most important
    benefits the state provides is protection.
  • Protection from what?

21
Social Contract Theory
  • Basic Premise One of the most important
    benefits the state provides is protection.
  • Many urban residents and the poor feel they are
    victims twice.

22
Social Contract Theory
  • Basic Premise One of the most important
    benefits the state provides is protection.
  • The right to self preservation is not completely
    given up when one joins the state.
  • How do we join the state?

23
Social Contract Theory
  • Basic Premise One of the most important
    benefits the state provides is protection.
  • How do we join the state?
  • Free people agree to give up some rights to the
    state
  • Right to be their own judge, jury, enforcer

24
Social Contract Theory
  • Can there be exceptions of surrender of rights to
    the state?
  • What justifies disobeying government laws?
  • Can government/society survive if exceptions are
    allowed?

25
Social Contract Theory
  • Can there be exceptions of surrender of rights to
    the state?
  • Yes
  • What justifies disobeying government laws?
  • Usurping individual rights, tyranny
  • Can government/society survive if exceptions are
    allowed?
  • Legal redress provides remedy without
    destabilization

26
Social Contract Theory
  • Should the state violate civil liberties in order
    to decrease crime?
  • What should citizen response be to their
    perception of lack of governmental protection?
  • What about inequality for women and racial
    minorities?

27
Social Contract Theory
  • If the state does not take measures to make all
    members of society truly equal, is citizen
    obligation to the state weakened?

28
Social Contract Theory
  • If the state does not take measures to make all
    members of society truly equal, is citizen
    obligation to the state weakened?
  • The state argues that no matter what your
    perception, you are always protected and thus
    always obliged to obey the law.

29
Social Contract Theory
  • What is the relationship between governmental
    protection and the citizens responsibility to
    obey the law?
  • Free surrender of some rights in exchange for
    protection/services
  • Equal protection
  • What are the legitimate limits of power for the
    state to preserve the peace?
  • Moral and ethical responses to given situations
  • What is political obligation if people are free
    to decide whether the state is doing its job?
  • Could the answer reasonably depend on your
    perspective?

30
Break
  • Read Assignments
  • Participate in Class Discussions
  • Review Notes Weekly
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com