Introduction to Mc: Meaning in the Marketplace - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Mc: Meaning in the Marketplace

Description:

If they do so, it is trademark infringement (a violation of the trademark law. ... McDonald's Corporation sued them, saying that it infringed on their trademark. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:283
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: muehleise
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Mc: Meaning in the Marketplace


1
Introduction to Mc- Meaning in the Marketplace
  • November 7,2006

2
What do you call these things?
3
(No Transcript)
4
In the US (Wisconsin)
  • Q-tips kleenex

5
  • scotch tape

6
In England
  • a hoover (used to hoover the floor)

7
In the Southern U.S.
  • a coke
  • (even if the flavor is orange or grape!)

8
  • Each of these examples shows how a brand name
    for a product can come to be used as a generic
    noun. This is very common kind of semantic
    change.

9
  • In some cases, the semantic change can go so far
    that a noun can even start to be used as a verb
    Hoover (brand name) ? hoover (generic word for
    vacuum cleaner) ? to hoover (verb, meaning "to
    vacuum the floor")

10
  • This kind of change is a natural linguistics
    process, but companies often fight against this
    tendency.
  • They want to protect their brand names and the
    images associated with them, and so they
    trademark their product names to legally protect
    them.

11
  • Average Americans may use the word "kleenex" for
    any brand of tissue, but the name "Kleenex" is a
    trademark owned by the Kimberley-Clark
    Corporation.

12
  • Other tissue manufacturers can't use the word to
    sell their products. If they do so, it is
    trademark infringement (a violation of the
    trademark law.)

13
  • Even when a brand name has become used as a
    common noun, companies often fight to keep their
    trademarks because it can give them an advantage
    in the marketplace.
  • If someone asks you to "buy some kleenex", for
    example, you are probably more likely to buy the
    kleenex with the name Kleenex.

14
  • However, in some cases, generic usage has become
    so widespread that companies decided to give up
    their right to the trademark, and the word then
    becomes a generic noun in the legal sense too.
  • This has happened with words such as aspirin and
    escalator.

15
  • Can you think of more examples (in any language)
    of brand names that have become, or are in the
    process of becoming, generic labels?

16
  • The protection of trademarks is well established
    in American law.
  • The reading for next week, however, describes an
    unusual legal case in which a corporation claimed
    that their trademark protection extended to part
    of a word, a single morpheme, namely, Mc-.

17
  • Notice that Mc- is not even a whole word, or
    entire brand name. Its just one morpheme (one
    part) of the name McDonalds.

18
  • Mc- is a Scottish morpheme meaning son of, and
    McDonald is a surname meaning son of Donald.
  • This surname became used as a corporation name,
    but of course, there are still many people who
    use it as a surname.

19
The legal case
  • Quality Inns International planned to use the
    name McSleep Inns for a new chain of budget
    hotels.
  • McDonald's Corporation sued them, saying that it
    infringed on their trademark.

20
  • Quality Inns said that they chose the name
    McSleep because they believed that Mc- gave the
    the name "an image of thift and cleanliness.
  • They argued that this image came not from the
    McDonald's corporation, but from the association
    of Mc- with Scottish things.

21
  • They said that many Scottish surnames start with
    Mc-, and there is a (positive) stereotype of
    Scottish people as being thrifty and clean.
  • They also argued that while McDonald's owned the
    trademark for the word McDonald's, it did not own
    the morpheme Mc-.

22
  • McDonald's argued that people would associate
    product names including Mc- with their
    corporation's products.
  • They had won an earlier lawsuit against a
    restaurant which was using the name McBagel's.

23
  • The judge in that case had said that when Mc- was
    used with a generic food name (bagels), it was an
    infringement of the trademark.
  • Probably this decision was made considering such
    as McDonald's products such as McFries, McChicken
    Sandwich, and McShakes.

24
  • McDonald's argued that this previous judgment
    showed that, although it didn't own Mc- itself,
    it owned a "family" of trademarks made using Mc-
    noun.

25
  • Quality Inns then argued that they were not using
    the name in a food related industry sleep is not
    a noun referring to food.

26
This case is interesting for us for two reasons.
  • It shows how linguistic issues might be involved
    in a legal case
  • It shows us one way linguists can gather evidence
    to learn about how language is actually used.

27
Other linguistic issues
  • In addition to the question of whether or not
    McDonald's can be said to own a family of
    trademarks, there are a few other issues
    important to the case.

28
  • 1. Would people think that McSleep Inns were
    related to the McDonald's Corporation?
  • If not, then there is a legal precedence for
    allowing two companies to use the same brand
    name.

29
  • For example, Notre Dame University and Notre
    Dame Cheese were both allowed to use Notre Dame,
    because it was judged that the public would not
    confuse the two or think that they were related.

30
  • 2. Can we say that Mc- is a generic morpheme, in
    the same way that aspirin is a generic noun (and
    in the way that Kleenex is becoming one too)?

31
  • The authors were asked to provide evidence to
    answer that last question, by showing how the
    prefix Mc- was actually being used to create new
    words.

32
  • They hoped to show that Mc- had a meaning of its
    own, independent of the one created by the
    McDonald's corporation.
  • That evidence could establish Mc- as a kind of
    generic morpheme which would then not be covered
    by trademark laws.

33
  • The method used by Lentine and Shuy is a kind of
    corpus linguistics.
  • Using a computer program, they searched a large
    collection of newspapers and magazines, looking
    for words containing Mc-.

34
  • They assembled these articles into a database,
    and then analyzed the way the Mc- words were
    used.
  • The goal was to find out how writers understood
    and used Mc-.

35
  • To find out about their results, read the
    homework assignment!

36
Note
  • The article includes 5 pages of examples at the
    back. You will probably want to sure to look at
    them at least briefly, but you don't have to read
    each of the examples carefully.
  • To help you read, on the class web page, you can
    find a list of definitions of linguistic terms
    used in this article.

37
After doing the reading, please prepare for class
by thinking about the following questions
  • Content Questions 4 and 7 on page 82
  • Questions for Discussion and Analysis 1 and 3,
    also on page 82
  • And also

38
  • Do you think the judge made the right decision in
    this case? Why or why not?

39
QUIZZES RETURNED
  • To help you study for the mid-term exam, you can
    pick up your past quizzes as you leave the room
    today. They are stapled together, and if you
    took all the quizzes, there should be FOUR of
    them.
  • Be sure that you know the correct answers for the
    questions you got wrong!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com