Can Newer Prescription Drugs Pay for Themselves Comparing Olanzapine and Lithium to Treat Bipolar Di - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Can Newer Prescription Drugs Pay for Themselves Comparing Olanzapine and Lithium to Treat Bipolar Di

Description:

Medication is very effective so drug and non-drug treatment are substitutable ... Factors Contributing to Increase in Prescription drug, 1997-2002 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: yzh85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Can Newer Prescription Drugs Pay for Themselves Comparing Olanzapine and Lithium to Treat Bipolar Di


1
Can Newer Prescription Drugs Pay for Themselves?
Comparing Olanzapine and Lithium to Treat Bipolar
Disorder
  • Yuting Zhang
  • November 28th, 2005

2
Research Question
  • Can the increased use of newer and more expensive
    drugs offset spending for other types of health
    care services?

3
Bipolar Disorder - Comparing Olanzapine and
Lithium
  • A disease that is associated with a high rate of
    hospitalization
  • Medication is very effective so drug and non-drug
    treatment are substitutable
  • A new drug recently came into market, equivalent
    or more effective than an existing drug
  • Not too rare disease

4
Study Design and Analysis
  • Data and sample selection
  • Empirical strategies
  • Interrupted time series
  • Differencing strategies
  • Instrumental variables
  • Results
  • Policy implications

5
Eligibility for Bipolar Disorder
Study-MarketScan database 1998-2001
  • Had a maintenance drug monotherapy, defined as an
    initial use of a drug continuously for at least
    three months (13,736)
  • Continuously enrolled in the network one year
    prior to and one year following the onset of
    maintenance monotherapy (3,073)
  • At least one inpatient diagnosis or two
    outpatient diagnoses of bipolar disorder in the
    1998-2001 period (1,492)
  • Never diagnosed as schizophrenia and no use of
    any other atypical antipsychotics and other
    bipolar-disorder related drugs 6-month before
    (935)

6
Comparison of Patient Characteristics
7
Identification Strategies
  • Propensity score matching
  • Empirical strategies
  • Interrupted time series
  • Differencing strategies
  • Instrumental variable

8
Re-Comparison of Patient Characteristics After
Matching
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Empirical Strategies to Address Endogeneity
Problem
  • Population-level estimate
  • Interrupted time series
  • Individual-level estimate
  • Differencing strategies
  • Fraction of zero outcome
  • Highly skewed and heavily tailed
  • Hetergeneity in residual
  • Instrumental variable

12
Interrupted Time Series
13
Generalized Linear Model (Gamma, Log)
14
Empirical Strategies to Address Endogeneity
Problem
  • Population-level estimate
  • Interrupted time series
  • Individual-level estimate
  • Differencing strategies
  • Fraction of zero outcome
  • Highly skewed and heavily tailed
  • Hetergeneity in residual
  • Instrumental variable

15
Instrument Variable
16
Two-stage Least Square
17
Comparison of Results (YTotal Non-drug Medical
Spending)
Note monthly average in the year after drug
treatment, significant at 1 level , number
of observation is 9366, robust s.e. clustered by
patients 1st F-test for IV is 15
18
Implications
  • Drug benefit coverage design
  • Drug approval procedure
  • Standards of economic evaluation of drug
    intervention
  • Optimal prescribing behavior
  • The effect on drug pricing

19
Are You Convinced?Why or why notThank you!
20
Change in Selected National Health Expenditures,
1970-2002
21
Factors Contributing to Increase in Prescription
drug, 1997-2002
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com