Options for Participation and Related IEP Decisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Options for Participation and Related IEP Decisions

Description:

breadth, depth, or. complexity. Inferences are ... Content reduced in breadth ... Needs supports that reduce complexity, breadth, depth of the content ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: dianeb162
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Options for Participation and Related IEP Decisions


1
Options for Participationand Related IEP
Decisions
  • http//www.osepideasthatwork.org/toolkit/index.asp

2
Options for Participation inCurrent Federal
RegulationsOption of the General Assessment
3
Option of Alternate AssessmentsType 1- Grade
Level Achievement
4
Option of Alternate AssessmentsType 2- Modified
Achievement
See the U.S. Department of Educations interim
policy on modified achievement standards at
http//www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/raising/disab-
options.html (retrieved October 20, 2005).
5
Option of Alternate AssessmentType 3- Alternate
Achievement
6
Options Summary
Some states make this option available to other
students.
7
The Decision Framework
  • IEP teams must determine how students with
    disabilities participate in statewide assessments
    for accountability, not whether they participate.

8
Premise
  • All students with or without disabilities, should
    participate in the general assessment without
    accommodations unless the IEP team determines
    otherwise.

9
Implications for IEP Teams In Choosing Assessment
Option
  • What is not relevant
  • What is relevant

10
What is Not Relevant for the IEP Teams Decision
  • Exemption
  • All students participate
  • Separate, Specialized Curriculum
  • All options are aligned with general curriculum/
    grade level content standards
  • Placement
  • Disability Label
  • Boosting Schools Outcomes on AYP

11
What is Relevant
  • Prerequisite Considerations
  • Has the student had access to grade level
    content?
  • Has the student had evidence-based instruction?
  • Was instruction by highly qualified teacher?
  • IF answer to above is NO, continue to apply
    grade level achievement standards and evaluate
    response to intervention

12
What is Relevant
  • Students Educational Needs
  • How does the student access the general
    curriculum?
  • What has been the students response to academic
    interventions?
  • How does this student interact with text?
  • Do the supports the student requires change the
    complexity of grade level material?
  • What inferences can be made about generalization?

13
When an option for test participation is
selected what will it mean?
14
What Inferences can Be Made
  • When the team chooses grade level achievement
    standards
  • Inferences from test results can be made to the
    breadth, depth, and complexity of the standards
    in the test specification for the general
    assessment with the
  • general assessment,
  • general assessment with accommodations, or
  • alternate assessment-grade level achievement

15
What Inferences can Be Made
  • When the team chooses modified achievement
    standards
  • Inferences from test results can be made to grade
    level expectations with specified level of
    breadth, depth, and complexity
  • Alternate assessment judged against modified
    achievement standards

16
What Inferences can Be Made
  • When the team chooses alternate achievement
    standards
  • Inferences from test results can be made to grade
    level content that is extensively prioritized but
    maintains expectation for progress in general
    curriculum
  • And assumes student performance is contingent on
    having the supports specified for the assessment
  • Alternate assessment judged against alternate
    achievement standards

17
Who might take the
  • Alternate Assessment
  • Judged Against
  • Modified Achievement Standards?

No final regulations had been established at the
time this paper was released.
18
What are Modified Achievement Standards?
  • Designed to enable inferences about grade level
    content expectations
  • somewhat reduced in
  • breadth,
  • depth, or
  • complexity
  • Inferences are constrained

19
Who are the 2 students?
  • Students with IEPs who are very, very, very hard
    to teach

20
Who are the 2 students?
  • Students who can learn grade level content, but
    in the time available
  • Cannot cover as much content
  • Cannot cover the content in as much depth
  • Cannot learn the content to the same degree of
    cognitive complexity

21
Grade Level Content
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for the general assessment.
22
Content reduced in breadth
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for grade level content with reduced
breadth.
23
Content reduced in depth
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for grade level content with reduced
depth.
24
Content reduced in cognitive complexity
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for grade level content with reduced
cognitive complexity.
25
Who are the 2 students?
  • Have persistent academic difficulties
  • Despite intensive, appropriate, relentless,
    evidence-based interventions
  • Over sufficient length of time
  • Cannot close the achievement gap

26
The time there is to learn it!
Start lower Work harder and longer Achieve
the same amount?
All there is to learn
27
The time there is to learn it!
Most Students
All there is to learn
Start lower Work hard to maintain pace
Achieve less.
28
Decision Framework applied to 2
  • 1. In what way does the student access the
    general curriculum?
  • S can learn a streamlined version of the
    content
  • 2. What has been the students response to
    academic interventions
  • S has persistent academic problems despite
    appropriate, intensive interventions

29
Decision Framework
  • 3. How does the student interact with text?
  • Controlled vocabulary reduced reading levels
  • May need text reader
  • 4. Do the supports needed by this student to
    perform or participate meaningfully change the
    complexity or cognitive demand of the material?
  • Needs supports that reduce complexity, breadth,
    depth of the content
  • Teacher scaffolding Fewer choices

30
Decision Framework
  • 5. What inferences can be made about students
    generalization/transfer of learning
  • Inferences constrained
  • Transfer of learning more limited
  • May transfer only to similar or familiar contexts

31
Who are the 2 students?
  • Simply stated, they are students for whom
  • The alternate assessment judged against alternate
    achievement standards is too easy
  • The general assessment judged against grade level
    achievement standards is too hard
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com