Carbon%20Storage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Carbon%20Storage

Description:

We can't correct the past but maybe we can target some level ... Deep saline filled basalt formations. Basic Mechanism is Direct injection. Ocean Sequestration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: GregB1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Carbon%20Storage


1
Carbon, Capture And Storage
2
Capture and Storage
  • Not quite this simple

3
Carbon Storage
  • What Can actually be deployed?

4
(No Transcript)
5
Stabilization Concept
  • We cant correct the past but maybe we can target
    some level at which CO2 reaches a constant value
  • Pre-industrialized value 280 ppm
  • Currently Value 388 ppm
  • Highest in Last 450,000 years 310 ppm
  • 2 degrees C increase 450 ppm

6
Stabilization Continued
  • Stabilizing atmospheric concentration is more
    physically important than limiting annual
    emission levels
  • Allows one to plan for the rest of the century ?
    a ton you put in now, means a ton you cant put
    in later
  • Shared planetary greenhouse gas emissions budget
  • As emission space dwindles, emission permit
    prices should rise

7
But
  • Carbon dioxide is not the only greenhouse gas ?
    Methane is becoming important
  • Current CO2 trajectory reaches 720 ppm by 2100
  • Stabilizing at 550 ppm (by 2100) requires
    reducing coal usage by about a factor of 3
    relative to current trend ? CHINA CHINA CHINA

8
Options for Global Energy System
  • Carbon Dioxide capture and storage (CSS) may play
    a pivotal role if we plan to implement it. This
    may allow CHINA CHINA CHINA to continue what its
    doing

9
CSS potential
  • Plenty of theoretical storage capacity but this
    is not evenly distributed around the world
  • If no access to natural storage reservoir then
    this might compel countries to build different
    infrastructure
  • Baseload coal fired power plants and
    coal-to-liquids facilities are the largest
    potential market for CSS

10
Geological Options for CSS
  • Depleted oil and gas reservoirs
  • Deep saline formations
  • Deep unmineable coal seams
  • Deep saline filled basalt formations
  • Basic Mechanism is Direct injection
  • Ocean Sequestration

11
World Wide Capacity 11,000 Gigatons
  • But unevenly distributed relative to load centers
    (China, Japan, Korea)
  • Canada, US and Australia are good

12
Required CSS Scale is Massive
  • There are currently 8100 individual point source
    CO2 emitters most of these are power plants

13
Emission Contributors
  • Coal is a good target

14
CCS Potential
  • 450 ppm stabilization requires 2200 GT of storage
    or roughly 1/5 of the worlds potential ? this is
    enormous!
  • Regional Ratios of Production to local storage
    show immense variation

15
(No Transcript)
16
An Economic Chain
  • Natural Gas Fired electricity produces about 1
    lbs of Carbon Dioxide per KWH generated
  • Assume 5 cents per KWH for competitive price to
    consumer
  • 1 Ton of CO2 is then 2000 KWH which is 100
  • Current injection prices are about 60 -80 per
    ton.
  • This is a therefore difficult economic model to
    make work. 2015 Goal is 10 per ton what
    economy of scale is there?

17
Worse Still is Down Turn IN Carbon Market
18
The Price Problem
  • Current price of Carbon

Current price is about 19.50 per ton for carbon.
Thus, as of February 2010 it essentially costs
4-5 times more to put Carbon in the ground than
in the atmosphere. This is the essential
financial reality!
19
Cost is not the only obstacle
  • Goal Capture 100 of a large power plants
    emissions and store them for 50 years?
  • Wow
  • How many injector wells are needed and what is
    their spacing?
  • Can same injectors be used for 50 years?
  • Does the reservoir leak?

20
Conclusions
  • CSS has high potential and does represent a
    direct climate-change mitigation technology
  • CSS economic model is not good unless significant
    fines/penalty for total country emissions are
    enacted
  • The next 5-10 years are a critical window to
    build pilot projects to gain real world
    experience and assess scaled up feasibility

21
Conclusions II
  • Clearly the electric power sector is the prime
    target. Production of electricity and in situ
    injection could determine sites of future LNG
    facilities.
  • But ? what is wisest? Investing limited resources
    in CSS or ramping up other sustainable energies
    (wind, solar, biofuel, hydrogen (from wind and
    solar)) ? this is a very tough call to make right
    now
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com