Financial Instability: Theories and Applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – Financial Instability: Theories and Applications PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 137c71-OGE4Z


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

Financial Instability: Theories and Applications


The views I express in this presentation are my own, and do not necessarily ... In the event, the FDIC bailed all creditors out ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: aie3
Learn more at:


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financial Instability: Theories and Applications

Financial InstabilityTheories and Applications
  • Jing Yang
  • Bank of England

The views I express in this presentation are my
own, and do not necessarily represent those of
the Bank of England. The Bank of England does
not accept any liability for misleading or
inaccurate information or omissions in the
information provided.
Financial InstabilityTheories and Applications
Bank of England --1997 reform
  • Monetary Policy
  • -- price stability
  • -- output
  • MPC monthly
  • Inflation Report
  • Financial Stability
  • -- to prevent systemic risk
  • -- publication
  • Financial Stability Review

Financial Stability A Working Definition
  • Financial stability is the condition where the
    financial system is able to withstand shocks
    without impairing the allocation of savings to
    investment opportunities in the economy.

Financial Instability in Pictures
The Financial System
The Real Economy
Financial Instability in Pictures
The Financial System
The Real Economy
Financial Instability in Pictures
The Financial System
The Real Economy
Financial Instability in Pictures
The Financial System
The Real Economy
Financial Instability in Pictures
The Financial System
The Real Economy
The Financial Instability Avalanche
  • The Anatomy of a Crisis
  • An (endogenous or exogenous) shock hits the
    banking system
  • The shock wipes out an initial set of (inherently
    fragile) banks
  • The first wave of failures creates a
    chain-reaction among otherwise healthy banks
    (contagion), creating a second wave of failures,
    etc., etc.
  • When the dust clears the banking/financial system
    is in melt-down
  • The real economy suffers
  • Let us explore each step of the chain

Informative Surveys of Financial Stability
  • A number of excellent surveys of the topic can be
  • De Brandt and Hartmann 2000, Systemic Risk A
    Survey, ECB Working Paper 35
  • Summer 2002, Banking Regulation and Systemic
    Risk, Bank of Austria Working Paper 57
  • Kaufman and Scott 2002, What is Systemic Risk
    and Do Bank Regulators Retard or Contribute to
    It? Loyola University (Chicago) Working Paper
  • More definitions of Financial Stability than you
    could possibly want
  • Schinasi 2004, Defining Financial Stability,
    IMF Working Paper WP/04/187

I. Source of the Fragility of BanksII.
Channels of ContagionIII. Cost of Banking
The Financial Instability
I. Source of the Fragility of Banks
The Fragility of the Banking System
  • The Source of Fragility
  • Banks take in deposits callable on demand
  • but extend (relatively) long term loans
  • This process is known as Maturity Transformation
  • So, if every depositor wants his money back at
    the same time, it wont be at the bank
  • Why do banks do this? The seminal model
  • Diamond and Dybvig 1983, Bank Runs, Deposit
    Insurance and Liquidity, Journal of Political

The Diamond-Dybvig Model
  • The Structure of the Model
  • The world consists of three periods (t1, t2, t3)
  • People wish to consume in t3, but may have to
    consume in t2
  • In t1 the bank and depositors can invest in
  • a long term technology with a high payoff in t3
    but a negative return if liquidated in t2
  • a short term liquid technology with a low
    positive return that can easily be transformed
    into cash in either period without loss
  • On their own, risk-averse individuals choose the
    liquid technology as the small probability that
    they need the money in t2 means that the liquid
    technology return exceeds the expected return on
    the long term technology

The Diamond-Dybvig Model
  • The Role of Banks
  • Banks take deposits from everyone and
  • Invest most of the money in the long term
  • Hold a portion of deposits in the liquid
    technology to provide for the liquidity needs of
    the depositors who want their money in t2
  • Banks offer an interest rate somewhere between
    that offered by the liquid short term technology
    and that of the long term technology
  • So, all depositors are better-off (when things go
    well), as they get higher returns then they can
    obtain on their own plus the option of getting
    their money in t2 if they need it
  • In essence, banks offer liquidity insurance

The Diamond-Dybvig Model
  • Banking Fragility
  • Suppose that for some random reason a greater
    than expected proportion of depositors seek to
    withdraw their cash in t2
  • As withdraws continue, the expected return for
    the patient investors declines (liquidating the
    long-run investment at a loss in t2 makes the pie
  • There comes a point where even a patient investor
    is better off getting his money in t2 than
    waiting. Anticipating this, everyone wants to
    get their money out first
  • BANK RUN!!!!

From Banks to the Banking System
  • Limitations of a Single Bank Analysis
  • A single bank failure wont have much affect on
    the stability of the financial system
  • A Banking System
  • The system consists of a number of Diamond/Dybvig
  • Individual banks experience liquidity shocks
  • The banks are linked together via the interbank
    loan market (the payment system)
  • The banks can therefore insure each other against
    an idiosyncratic liquidity shock by borrowing or
    lending on the interbank market
  • The Banking System is one big bank

A Banking Crisis
  • Normal Times
  • If an individual bank experiences a liquidity
    shock, then it can meet that extra liquidity
    demand by borrowing on the interbank market
    rather than liquidate a portion of its long term
    assets (at a loss)
  • Individual bank runs become less likely
  • Crisis
  • Suppose that a liquidity shock hits the economy
    as a whole
  • If the shock exceeds the liquid reserves of the
    banking system, then moving liquidity around via
    interbank loans will not suffice
  • Individual banks must then liquidate long-term
    assets (at a loss), making the patient investors
    who dont withdraw worse off
  • BANK RUNS!!!!

Key Papers
  • Diamond and Rajan 2001, Liquidity Risk,
    Liquidity Creation, and Financial Fragility A
    Theory of Banking, Journal of Political Economy
  • Allen and Gale 2000, Financial Contagion,
    Journal of Political Economy 108
  • Chen 1999, Banking Panics The Role of
    First-Come, First-Served Rule and Information
    Externalities, Journal of Political Economy 107

II. Channel of Contagion
Getting the Snowball RollingChannels of
  • Bank Runs
  • Random liquidity demands trigger bank runs that
    cause system melt-down
  • Interbank exposures
  • Bank failures spread because failing banks lack
    the resources needed to repay their interbank
    loans to otherwise healthy banks, causing them to
    fail in turn
  • The Asset-Price Channel
  • An individual shock that causes many banks to
    sell related assets at the same time, overloading
    the market for such assets, pushing prices down
  • Exposure to Common Shocks (not really contagion)
  • Banks with big exposures to the same risk can all
    be wiped out by a big shock

Channel 1 bank runs
Bank Runs and Transaction Costs
  • Taking all of your money out of the bank isnt
  • You will have to find another bank
  • You might get robbed
  • So, one might think that people would need a very
    good reason to withdraw all of their cash
  • If everyone knows that everyone faces a big cost
    for withdrawing all of their cash, sunspot/panic
    driven bank runs are far less likely to occur

Bank Runs in the Real World
  • Bank runs dont actually happen
  • Reviewing almost 3,000 bank failures over the
    period 1865 to 1936 (mostly before deposit
    insurance), OConner 1938 found that runs or
    loss of public confidence was cited as the reason
    for the failure in less than 5 of cases
  • Deposit insurance makes runs even less likely

Bank Runs Key Empirical Papers
  • OConner 1938, The Banking Crisis and Recovery
    Under the Roosevelt Administration, Chicago
    Callaghan and Co.
  • Calomiris and Mason 2000, Causes of U.S. Bank
    Distress During the Depression, NBER Working
    Paper no. 7919
  • Calomiris and Mason 1997, Contagion and Bank
    Failures During the Great Depression The June
    1932 Chicago Banking Panic, American Economic
    Review 87
  • Saunders and Wilson 1996, Contagious Bank
    Runs Evidence from the 1929-33 Period, Journal
    of Financial Intermediation 5
  • Benston, Eisenbeis, Horvitz, Kane, and Kaufman
    1986, Perspectives on Safe and Sound Banking,
    Cambridge MIT Press

Channel 2 inter-bank linkages
Contagion Through Connections The Interbank
Loan Channel
  • The interbank loan market is extremely active
  • This loans create exposures between banks
  • So, if one bank fails, it is at least logically
    possible that it will drag its creditors down
    with it
  • People have explored this possibility through
    case studies and through simulations of bank
    failures using the actual (estimated) matrix of
    interbank exposures for many countries

Interbank ExposuresA Case Study of Continental
  • Continental was the 7th largest US bank at time
    of failure in 1984
  • Assets in excess of 32 billion
  • Continental was extremely active in the interbank
  • Weird Illinois banking regulations limited each
    bank to one branch
  • Even with a big branch, one is not going to
    become the 7th largest bank in the on the basis
    of local deposits alone
  • Continental therefore financed its expansion with
    interbank loans
  • At the time of failure, Continental was the
    largest correspondent bank in the US, with either
    loans or deposits from 2300 other banks

Continental Illinois What Happened
  • In the event, the FDIC bailed all creditors out
  • But, the House Banking Committee investigated
    what would have happened without the government
  • Assuming losses of 60 cents on the dollar for
    Continentals assets
  • 27 small banks become insolvent
  • 56 additional small banks take a big hit ( gt50
    of capital)
  • Total losses to heavily affected banks lt 500

Contagion Through Interbank Exposures
Simulation Studies
  • Method
  • Estimate the matrix of interbank exposures using
    real data for the banking system as a whole
  • Suppose that a given bank fails or
  • Model overall bank exposures and hit the banking
    system with a shock such that an initial set of
    banks fail
  • Elsinger, Lehar, and Summer 2003
  • Assume a loss given default on a failed banks
  • Trace the impact of initial and any follow-on
    bank failures through the system using the
    estimated interbank exposure matrix

Simulation Studies Results
  • Results
  • Every study finds the same thing with a large
    value of loss given default, there is limited

Simulation Studies Key Articles
  • Furfine got the literature rolling, and the idea
    was contagious!
  • US Furfine 2003, Interbank Exposures
    Quantifying the Risk of Contagion, Journal of
    Money, Credit, and Banking 35
  • Belgium Degryse and Nguyen 2004, Interbank
    Exposures An Empirical Examination of Systemic
    Risk in the Belgian Banking System, National
    Bank of Belgium Working Paper
  • UK Wells 2002, UK Interbank Exposures
    Systemic Risk Implications, Financial Stability

  • Germany Upper and Worms 2002, Estimating
    Bilateral Exposures in the German Interbank
    Market Is there a Danger of Contagion?,
    Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 9
  • Austria Elsinger, Lehar, and Summer 2003, The
    Risk of Interbank Credits A new Approach to the
    Assessment of Systemic Risk, Bank of Austria
    Working Paper

Channel 3 The Asset Price Channel
The Asset Price Channel
  • Demand curves slope down in securities markets
  • Markets are not infinitely deep
  • As more people sell a given asset, the natural
    buyers (i) exhaust their demand (ii) hit their
    risk tolerance (iii) run out of money
  • The equilibrium price of the asset falls (for at
    least a while)
  • Pioneering work Grossman and Miller 1988

Assets Price Channel
  • The snowball
  • A trader knows that he must sell security A, that
    others may have to sell A, and that As demand
    curve has a steep slope at the time
  • Everyone who is long in A wants to sell first
  • A race for the door ensues (everyone rushes to
  • The rush to sell causes the panic that all the
    traders were dreading

  • The mountain down which the snowball falls
  • An initial market price fall puts many traders at
    a level close to their loss-limits, encouraging
    them all to close out their positions
  • Morris and Shin 2003
  • Risk neutral traders who may have to sell next
    period all sell now to avoid the possibility of
    selling during a panic, causing the panic instead
  • Bernardo and Welch 2003
  • Analytically equivalent to a Diamond/Dybvig Bank

  • Why doesnt the market automatically stabilize?
  • Suppose that trader Z knows that other traders
    have to sell
  • Z will benefit by starting an asset run
  • Prices will fall to a below long-run value level,
    giving Z a chance to buy low (during the panic)
    and sell high (after normal conditions apply)
  • Far from stepping in to provide liquidity during
    a panic, then, traders in Zs position help the
    panic along
  • The market will not automatically stabilize

Asset Price Contagion
  • The problem conflict between individual
    incentive and collective incentive
  • Runs start because each individual trader ignores
    how his actions affect the probability of a
  • Individually rational to run, but collectively
  • Privately rational (but collectively inefficient)
    selling then leads to a crash

Asset Price Contagion Key Papers
  • A new literature
  • Grossman and Miller 1988, Liquidity and Market
    Structure, Journal of Finance 43
  • Bernado and Welch 2003, Liquidity and
    Financial Market Runs, Forthcoming in the
    Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • Morris and Shin 2003, Liquidity Black Holes,
    Forthcoming in Review of Finance
  • Schnabel and Shin 2003, Foreshadowing LTCM
    The Crisis of 1763, LSE Working Paper

Channel 4 common shock
What Does Cause Banks to Fail - common shock
  • Individual banks fail due to adverse economic
  • -- managerial Incompetence/Rogue Trading
  • Adverse Conditions The most common factors cited
    for bank failure in OConnors 1938 survey of
    why banks failed were local financial distress
    and incompetent management
  • One might then think that waves of bank failures
    occur because many banks pursue strategies that
    create exposures to the same adverse shock

An Aside Prudential Supervision
  • If (unhealthy) banks fail because of macro
    factors, is there any point to prudential
  • Yes!
  • As banks approach failure, their incentive to
    gamble for resurrection becomes enormous
  • If a bank increase the risk in its portfolio, it
    can stick the deposit insurance fund if it loses
    and keep the gains if it wins
  • If regulators do not monitor banks to see which
    banks are in this position, and do not act
    promptly to shut-down any bank they find in this
    position, then the cost of a financial crisis can
    rise dramatically

Common Shocks Key Papers
  • This literature is vast, but here are a couple of
    papers to get one started
  • Calomiris and Mason 2000, Causes of U.S. Bank
    Distress During the Depression, NBER Working
    Paper no. 7919
  • Demirguc-Kunt and Detragiache 1998, The
    Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing and
    Developed Countries, IMF Staff Papers 45
  • Kaufman and Scott 2002, What is Systemic Risk
    and do Bank Regulators Retard or Contribute to
    it?, Loyola University (Chicago) working paper
  • Kaufman and Seelig 2002, Post-Resolution
    Treatment of Depositors at Failed Banks and
    Severity of Bank Crises, Systemic Risk, and
    Too-Big-To-Fail, Economic Perspectives (Chicago

III. Consequence of Financial Crisis
Cost of Financial Instability
Counter Example Norwegian
  • During the Norwegian banking crisis, banks
    holding 95 of all commercial bank assets became
  • Without affecting the health of the Norwegian
    Corporate Sector
  • Ongena, Smith, Michalsen 2003
  • Norways well developed and well working
    financial markets provided corporates with a
    robust alternative method to acquire financial
  • Strong protection for minority shareholders
  • Transparent accounting
  • Strong public markets

  • Financial crises are public badcreate
    externality and cause output losses.
  • Source of contagion liquidity shock.
  • Channels of contagion bank run inter-bank
    market asset price cascade and common shock.
  • Financial market can compliment banking system as
    financial intermediation.
  • How does the structure of a financial system
    contribute to its stability?