Teachinglearning environments and student learning in electronic engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Teachinglearning environments and student learning in electronic engineering

Description:

Analysing teaching-learning environments as a web of interacting influences ' ... Seeing how to set about analysing different circuits ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: morayhouse4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teachinglearning environments and student learning in electronic engineering


1
Designing teaching-learning environments to
promote disciplinary ways of thinking
Noel Entwistle University of Edinburgh Project
web site www.ed.ac.uk/etl
2
Outline of the seminar
  • Key concepts and findings from previous research
  • Introduction to the ETL project
  • Additional concepts developed during the ETL
    project
  • Analyses electronic engineering as an example
  • Findings from other subjects and the project as
    whole
  • Discussing ways of promoting disciplinary
    thinking

3
Key concepts and findings from previous research
  • Epistemological development during the degree
    course
  • Conceptions of learning and their development
  • Approaches to learning and studying
  • Perceptions of teaching affect approaches
    vice-versa
  • and teaching itself affects ways of
    studying, not just knowledge
  • Teaching-learning environments acting as systems

4
(No Transcript)
5
Approaches to learning and studying
  • Deep approach in learning - seeking meaning
  • Surface approach in learning - reproducing
  • Strategic approach to studying - organised
    effort
  • Marton, Hounsell Entwistle (1997)

6
Deep approach to learning
  • Intention to understand ideas and engage with
    them
  • Typical learning processes - but specific to each
    subject area
  • Relating ideas to previous knowledge and
    experience
  • Looking for patterns and underlying principles
  • Checking evidence and relating it to conclusions
  • Examining logic and argument cautiously and
    critically
  • Memorising whatever is essential to
    understanding
  • Monitoring understanding as learning progresses
  • Outcome Thoughtful accounts with evidence of
    independent identification and structuring of
    information and reasoning

7
Surface approach to learning
  • Intention to reproduce without much effort or
    thinking
  • Typical learning processes
  • Treating the course as unrelated bits of
    knowledge
  • Routinely memorising facts carrying out
    procedures
  • Focusing narrowly on the minimum syllabus
    demands
  • Seeing little value or meaning in the course or
    tasks set
  • Studying without reflecting on either purpose or
    strategy
  • Outcome Descriptive, derivative accounts
    relying mainly on readily accessible sources

8
Strategic approach to studying
  • Intention to carry out the required work
    efficiently
  • Typical study processes
  • Organising studying thoughtfully
  • Managing time and effort effectively
  • Putting effort into the required work
  • Forcing oneself to concentrate on work
  • Being alert to assessment requirements and
    criteria
  • Monitoring the effectiveness of ways of studying
  • Outcome Depends on the balance between deep
    and surface approaches used with
    organised effort

9
Students perceptions of good teaching
  • Reasonable workload with some elements of choice
  • Teaching clear and pitched at the students own
    level
  • Steady pace in presenting new ideas
  • Clear explanation based on what students know
  • Staff enthusiasm for the subject being taught
  • Staff interest in, and empathy with, students
  • Provision of full and timely feedback on
    performance
  • Fairness in assessment with grades fully
    justified
  • Marton, Hounsell Entwistle (1997)

10
Attribution of causality through comments
  • The concepts are difficult but the lecturers
    assume we know it and so go at
  • a fast pace. People cant say they dont
    understand, and yet the lecturer
  • keeps on going once you get behind, you cant
    get back on terms. (Engineering)
  • Recently we were doing Fourier analysis, and the
    lecturer gave an explanation,
  • saying that it was like when you banged a drum
    and got lots of different sounds. He
  • said If you look at it this way, you can see
    why, and he was right, you could see
  • why. (Physics)
  • If the tutors have enthusiasm, then they really
    fire their own students Im really
  • good at and enjoy this subject, but thats only
    because the tutor has been so
  • enthusiastic and now I really love it (English)
  • Some staff have a lack of empathy about
    students relative knowledge levels, so
  • you cant attach anything that youve been told
    to something that you know already,
  • and yet that is important in learning
    (Psychology)

11
Analysing teaching-learning environments as a
web of interacting influences
  • Inappropriate approaches (to learning) are
    simply induced (by teaching) just one piece in
    thejigsaw that is out of place ... may
    interfere with the relation between the learner
    and the content. Encouraging students
    consistently to adopt deep approaches and employ
    them holistically is ... difficult because ...
    all the pieces need to fit together.
  • Eizenberg, 1988, p. 196-7

12
A systems approach to higher education
  • Constructive alignment involves choosing aims
    that demand individual understanding, ensuring
    that teaching methods encourage and support those
    aims and that assignments and assessment focus
    on, and reward, the achievement of those aims.
  • The students are entrapped in this web of
    consistency, optimising the likelihood that they
    will engage in the appropriate learning
    activities, but paradoxically leaving them free
    to construct their knowledge
  • Biggs (2003, p. 27)

13
Introduction to the ETL projectOutline research
objectives and processes
  • Work with colleagues in five subject areas to
    identify the most distinctive aspects of teaching
    and learning in their subject area
  • Explore how specific teaching-learning
    environments in each subject area affect
    students approaches to studying and learning
    outcomes.
  • Use this evidence to negotiate possible
    adjustments to the teaching-learning environment
    and evaluate their effectiveness
  • Develop conceptual frameworks and ways of
    thinking about the effects of teaching-learning
    environments on the quality of student learning

14
Diverse settings investigated
  • Five contrasting subject areas involved initially
  • electronic engineering, biological sciences,
    economics, history, and media studies
    (dropped later)
  • 17 departments in varied university
    settings, ancient, civic, 1960s,1990s one
    college
  • Working with two course teams in two course units
    in each university - early and late (mainly
    first and final years)

15
Main phases in the project
  • Investigate the teaching-learning environments
    used by staff in departments rated as excellent
    in TQA/QAA
  • Analyse questionnaire and interview data
    collected during the first year of the
    collaboration and discuss the implications of the
    findings with the course team
  • Discuss the possibility of a collaborative
    initiative designed to enhance the
    teaching-learning environment
  • Implement the initiative and collect the same
    data from the following year group analyse and
    discuss with the course team the effects of the
    changes

16
Main components of data
  • Analyse eight reports from TQA/QAA reports of
    departments rated excellent in each subject
    area and conduct telephone interviews with staff
    in four of them
  • Interview collaborating staff distribute
    questionnaires to students at the beginning
    (Learning and Studying) and the end of each
    selected course unit (Experiences of Teaching and
    Learning)
  • Interview small groups of students about their
    experiences of the teaching, using a schedule
    based on the second questionnaire but encouraging
    additional aspects to be raised

17
Main concepts used during the ETL project
  • Ways of thinking and practising (WTP) and
    throughlines
  • Teaching-learning environment (TLE)
  • Perceptions of the teaching-learning environment
  • Approaches to learning and studying
  • Constructive alignment - congruence within the
    TLE
  • Troublesome knowledge
  • The inner logic of the subject and its pedagogy

18
Ways of thinking and practising in the subject
(WTP)
  • During most of the interviews, staff seemed to be
    more comfortable to talk about what we came to
    see as the ways of thinking and practising in the
    subject, rather than about the formally defined
    intended learning objectives
  • Ways of thinking and practising in the subject
    describe the richness, depth and breadth of what
    students might learn through engagement with a
    given subject area in a specific context. This
    might include coming to terms with particular
    understandings, forms of discourse, values or
    ways of acting which are regarded as central to
    graduate-level mastery of a discipline or subject
    area
  • McCune Hounsell (2005)

19
Ways of thinking in economics
  • More recently I've come round to the view that
    economists have
  • acquired a way of looking at the world which is
    indelible, and even
  • though they may not find themselves in a
    position where they can
  • use their analytical techniques very
    consciously, in fact their
  • whole way of treating questions is affected by
    this kind of training.
  • quoted in Entwistle (1997)

20
Throughlines to keep the focus on understanding
  • Throughlines reflect what teachers believe is
    most important
  • for the students to learn in their course
    (WTPs)
  • These goals are set out clearly and revisited
    regularly during
  • the course to keep the students focused on the
    understanding
  • aims decided for the course (i.e. aims with
    that focus).
  • Introduced as part of the Teaching for
    Understanding Framework
  • developed by the Harvard Graduate School of
    Education Project Zero.
  • (Wiske, 2003)

21
(No Transcript)
22
Perceptions of course demands
  • Prior knowledge required
  • Pace with which new material presented
  • Difficulty of the concepts and skills being
    learned
  • Difficulty of the generic skills involved
  • Workload required

23
Perceptions of teaching-learning environment
  • Overall enjoyment and interest
  • Clarity and coherence in course organisation
  • Teaching that encourages learning
  • Set work and feedback supporting learning
  • Staff enthusiasm and support
  • Support from other students

24
Troublesome knowledge
  • Ritual knowledge - names and dates are rote
    learned
  • Inert knowledge that the student does not often
    use
  • Conceptually difficult knowledge
  • such as complex technical knowledge or ideas
    affected by mistaken expectations derived from
    everyday experience
  • Alien knowledge such as presentism in history
  • Tacit knowledge - acted on but not conscious of.
  • Perkins (in press)

25
Threshold conceptsin economics
  • A threshold concept can be considered as akin
    to a portal,
  • opening up a new and previously inaccessible
    way of thinking
  • about something. It represents a transformed
    way of
  • understanding or viewing something without
    which the learner
  • cannot progress.
  • For example, if opportunity cost is
    accepted by students as a
  • valid way of interpreting the world, it
    fundamentally changes their
  • way of thinking about their own choices, as
    well as serving as a
  • tool to interpret the choices made by others.
  • Meyer Land (2003)

26
Strategy for integrating findings
  • Establish the main type of ways of thinking and
    practising being encouraged in the course units
  • Analyse questionnaires and interviews to
    establish the extent to which students saw the
    teaching-learning environment as supporting their
    learning effectively
  • Discuss findings with staff and discuss
    possibilities for a collaborative initiative
  • Evaluate the perceived effects of the initiatives
    to explore effective pedagogy within the subject
    area
  • A summary of the overall project findings can be
    found in our Final Report to the ESRC, while more
    detailed descriptions are in our four Subject
    Area Reports. All these are available on the
    project website.

27
Changes in approaches to studying Percentage
agreement with items before and during units
  • Course unit A (94) B
    (68) C (54)
  • I usually set out to understand Before 95.6
    87.5 81.2
  • During 72.1 82.5 75.0
  • Trouble making sense of things Before 25.0
    40.0 43.7
  • During 61.8 55.0
    34.4
  • Generally put a lot of effort in Before 60.3
    77.5 53.1

  • During 51.5 60.0 40.6
  • Systematic and organised study Before 65.9
    62.5 46.9
    During 44.1 47.5 50.0

28
Experiences of teaching Percentage agreement
with items on the same three units
  • Course unit A (94) B (68)
    C (54)
  • Easy pace in lectures 25.3 46.9
    72.5
  • Amount of work required easy 33.3 34.7
    52.5
  • Teaching fitted in with learning 72.0 67.3
    97.5
  • Most of material was interesting 45.3 34.7
    82.5
  • Plenty of examples provided 66.7 51.0
    95.0
  • Staff were patient in explaining 81.3 81.6
    92.5
  • Feedback given made things clearer 63.7 30.6
    47.5

29
Effects of pace and lack of variation
  • At the beginning I was all at sea, sort of too
    much information at
  • one time. I just think that were given too many
    different concepts at
  • one time It seemed that once wed gone over one
    specific
  • network we werent given enough time to absorb
    the information
  • before we were given another one, and the
    difficulty level increased
  • as you went onwards.
  • Youre repeatedly reading it, hearing it, talking
    about it,
  • doing it, doing it, doing it and that doesnt
    work for me. For first,
  • second and part of third year, it was a case of
    scraping by. Ive
  • tried to go through the motions its the
    sameness. Each day is that
  • pattern.

30
Delayed understandingTerm introduced by Scheja,
in press
  • In second year I got a better understanding of
    what I learnt in first
  • year. Now in third year Ive kind of learnt what
    I was supposed to
  • know in second year. Its a shame that Ive
    never felt that Ive learned
  • it in the actual year it was taught
  • When youre being taught something, youre just
    desperately trying to
  • learn it, and theres not necessarily a whole
    lot of interest. Youre
  • scrambling back to notes in preparing for the
    exams, trying to
  • understand the course. And at some point during
    the learning
  • process, you do get interested and then things
    start to fall into place

31
Reaction to the lack of understanding
  • You have to focus your energy where its
    rewarded You work
  • through the problems and for the analogue ones,
    you dont get
  • any answers out of them.
  • You cant see how in the world you got from
    point a to point b.
  • I tended to work blindly. I knew if I just
    followed these steps, then
  • I could get an answer, but have no idea what to
    do and yet we
  • scrape by.
  • We probably would have got great marks had we
    actually
  • understood what we were doing.

32
Collaborative initiatives in analogue
  • Increase students focus on understanding by
    encouraging them to reflect on their
    problem-solving processes while working on
    tutorial problems
  • Problem-solving in electronics stressed and
    modelled during lectures examples classes
  • Students encouraged to use a tutorial workbook to
    record and comment on solutions
  • Arrangements made to facilitate systematic group
    discussion during tutorials

33
Helpfulness of teaching-learning activities
in three units involved in the collaborative
initiative
  • Mean ratings on 1 -7 scale Unit A
    Unit B Unit C
  • (N 59) (73)
    (27)
  • The way diagrams presented 5.0
    5.3 5.9
  • The way ideas explained in lectures 4.3
    5.6 5.2
  • Lecture explanations of problems 4.2
    5.8 4.9
  • Worked examples provided 5.0 3.6
    5.7
  • Working on problems on own 5.2 4.6
    5.3
  • Using the log-book 4.2 4.3 5.1
  • Staff help in tutorials 5.0 4.0
    5.9
  • Discussions with other students 4.8
    4.7 5.0

34
Experience of using a tutorial workbook
  • I think when the lecturer mentioned the
    logbook and how you can
  • look back and it will be helpful - at the time
    I thought, Helpful, my
  • bum! I'm just going to realise Im not going
    to be any good at all.
  • But after about Week 4, we were answering
    questions in class,and
  • everybody was looking through their notes and
    Adrian says to me
  • Thats in your logbook and I say, Oh, so
    it is, and we worked
  • everything out really well. So, thats when I
    thought a workbook
  • was going to be a must then.
  • I got used to writing down all the problems in
    the workbook and
  • then you can sort of look back and read through
    it and understand
  • what you have done At first Id just look at
    a couple of tutorial
  • questions and write down what I thought. But
    now I've got like
  • pages of stuff written down, so I think the
    workbook now is really
  • important to my understanding.

35
Remaining issues concerning students
  • Other changes that students would have welcomed
    but could bit
  • be implemented included
  • Overcoming a perceived step-change in the
    teaching of analogue between the first and second
    years
  • Introducing substantial reductions in the
    content, and more variety provided for students
    in the lectures and generally
  • Avoiding time-tabling problems that left students
    in the same room and doing similar things for
    long periods
  • Providing opportunities to work collaboratively
    and also to get regular and helpful feedback on
    the tutorial problems

36
Ways of thinking and practising in analogue
electronics
  • Appreciating the overall function of a circuit
  • Recognising the crucial groups of components
  • Seeing how to set about analysing different
    circuits
  • Having the necessary analytic tools for
    solutions
  • Developing a memory bank of contrasting examples
  • Thinking intuitively in designing new circuits

37
The inner logic of teaching analogue Essential
teaching-learning emphases and activities
  • Circuits linked to real-life illustrations from
    industry
  • Main circuit components highlighted in diagrams
  • Ways of thinking about circuits exemplified
  • Ways of solving tutorial problems explained
  • Students work through sets of varied examples
  • Worked examples provided at the appropriate time
  • Progress monitored in tutorial work and tests

38
Supporting student learning in analogue
  • Conclusions emerging from work on electronic
    engineering
  • The WTPs suggest an inner logic to the subject
    area and its
  • pedagogy - certain teaching-learning emphases
    and activities
  • are essential.
  • But these aspects of the teaching-learning
    environment are
  • currently offered in ways which may not suit
    even a majority of
  • students. The detailed feedback from students
    provided
  • suggestions about how all the elements might be
    enhanced.
  • The general literature on teaching and learning
    in higher
  • education also suggested other possibilities
    that could be
  • adapted to the pedagogy of electronic
    engineering

39
Overall findings from the ETL project
  • Generic pedagogic principles and methods need to
    be reinterpreted in terms of the inner logic of
    the subject
  • Conceptually-based feedback from students can be
    used to enhance the congruence of
    teaching-learning environments
  • Emphasising WTPs (rather than intended learning
    outcomes) have advantages in broadening the
    students focus in studying
  • Students are finding that a lack of detailed,
    prompt and intelligible feedback is affecting
    their learning
  • In large first-year classes, problems are being
    created by a lack of uniform practices and of
    shared information among teaching staff and
    tutors

40
(No Transcript)
41
Ways of thinking in history
  • Seeing history as being socially constructed and
    contested
  • Interpreting, synthesising and evaluating
    historical evidence
  • Placing events and topics within broader
    historical contexts
  • Alertness to interconnections among phenomena
  • Being sensitive to the strangeness of the past
  • Viewing events from different perspectives

42
Enhancing TLEs in history
  • Refining and reinforcing thematic structures of
    modules by reducing the emphasis on chronology or
    reducing the time period
  • Sharing more explicitly with students and other
    staff the reasoning behind module structures and
    links with overall WTPs
  • Providing students with more detailed
    discipline-specific guidance on the specific
    skills required to read documents and analyse
    evidence
  • Making more materials available through virtual
    learning environments
  • Modelling explicitly in lectures and tutorials
    how historians go about marshalling evidence to
    support or contest different lines of argument
  • Providing supportive tutorial environments to
    provide intellectual challenge without personal
    threat

43
Ways of thinking in economics
  • Using theoretical abstractions to think about the
    real world
  • Understanding economic concepts and models
  • Using deductive and inductive reasoning to
    analyse situations
  • Interpreting econometric results from statistics
    and graphs
  • Interpreting empirical evidence and understanding
    the relationship between theory and data
  • Developing awareness of interconnections between
    concepts in making sense of the wider picture of
    real-world economics

44
Enhancing TLEs in economics
  • Considering ways of coping with the diversity of
    student intakes in first- year classes
  • Putting greater emphasis on conceptual aspects of
    the subject and avoiding unnecessary reliance on
    the detailed analysis of evidence
  • Identifying threshold concepts, teaching them
    more intensively and ensuring that assessment
    emphasises rewards their understanding
  • Providing greater variety in students
    experiences of teaching and learning and in the
    assessment procedures adopted
  • Developing assessment procedures that encourage
    broader revision for exams while stressing the
    importance of problem solving
  • Trying to bridge the theory-real world divide
    more effectively by using more authentic
    problem-solving

45
Ways of thinking in biological sciences
  • Understanding the nature of evidence and how it
    is generated
  • Thinking critically about evidence and its
    interpretation
  • Using visualisation where appropriate and
    thinking systematically
  • Understanding relationships between findings and
    theory
  • Designing and carrying out small-scale research
    studies
  • Recognising that evidence is contested and
    theories provisional
  • Making interconnections between topics and seeing
    them in a real-world wider context

46
Enhancing TLEs in biological sciences
  • Providing fuller explanations about the reasons
    behind encouraging first-year students to develop
    some of the communication skills used by
    biologists in a assignment about explaining
    concepts to lay people
  • Encouraging better communication between
    lecturers and tutors on a first-year biological
    sciences course and trying to make the level of
    marking of coursework by tutors more consistent
  • Helping students to adjust to the epistemological
    and technical challenges encountered by a
    step-change in learning requirements between
    second-year and final year
  • Bringing in active researchers to contribute to a
    final year module so that students heard how the
    subject was progressing. Also working on actual
    data to develop research skills.

47
(No Transcript)
48
Discussion of ways of designing TLEs to promote
disciplinary ways of thinking
  • Select a particular topic area from your own
    experience.
  • What are the main ways of thinking and practising
    that you would want students to acquire? A
    starting point could be thinking about what is
    involved in adopting a deep approach in that
    subject area.
  • Is it possible to discern an inner logic which
    makes certain forms of teaching essential if
    students are to learn easily and effectively?
  • How are these forms of teaching currently being
    provided? To what extent do these appear to be
    congruent with the WTPs?
  • What aspects of knowledge prove troublesome for
    students? Could these difficulties be discussed
    more explicitly with students? Would it be
    possible to spend more time on these aspects and
    check that students have understood before moving
    on?

49
Indicative references (1)
  • Anderson, C. Day, K. (2005). Purposive
    environments engaging students in the values and
    practices of history. Higher Education, 49,
    319-343. ETL project looking at history
  • Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for Quality
    Learning at University. (2nd Ed). Buckingham
    SRHE and Open University Press. constructive
    alignment
  • Eizenberg, N. (1988). Approaches to learning
    anatomy developig a programme for pre-clinical
    students. See Ramsden (1988, pp. 178-198)
  • Entwistle, N. J. (1998). Improving teaching
    through research in student learning. In J. J. F.
    Forest (Ed.), University Teaching International
    Perspectives (pp. 73-112). New York Garland
    Publishing. general review of teaching and
    learning and an earlier version of the conceptual
    map
  • Entwistle, N. J. McCune, V. S. (2005) The
    conceptual bases of study strategy inventories in
    higher education. Educational Psychology Review,
    16, 325-346. Review of several study strategy
    inventories
  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J., Entwistle, N. J.
    (1997). The experience of learning implications
    for teaching and learning in higher education.
    (now available www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EOL.html
    ). Approaches to and conceptions of learning,
    and economics quote

50
Indicative references (2)
  • McCune, V. S. Hounsell, D. J. (2005). The
    development of students ways of thinking and
    practising in three final-year biology courses.
    Higher Education, 49, 255-289. ETL project
    looking at biology
  • Meyer, J. H. F. Land, R. (2005). Threshold
    concepts and troublesome knowledge
    epistemological considerations and a conceptual
    framework for teaching and learning, Higher
    Education, 49, 373-388. ETL project looking at
    economics and other areas
  • Perkins, D. N. (1999). The many faces of
    constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57 (3),
    6-11.
  • Perry, W. G. (1988). Different worlds in the same
    classroom. In Ramsden (1988, pp. 145-161)
    epistemological stages
  • Ramsden, P. (1988). Improving learning new
    perspectives. London Kogan Page. General review
    of student learning by Ramsden, also with Marton
  • Scheja, M (in press). Delayed understanding and
    staying in phase students perceptions of their
    study situation. Higher Education.
  • Wiske, M. S. (Ed.) (1998). Teaching for
    understanding linking research with practice.
    San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com