NON LINEAR 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A STEEL BEAM SUBJECTED TO EQUAL AND OPPOSITE END MOMENTS DUE TO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

NON LINEAR 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A STEEL BEAM SUBJECTED TO EQUAL AND OPPOSITE END MOMENTS DUE TO

Description:

NON LINEAR 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A STEEL BEAM SUBJECTED ... provide a large increase in ductility, the key survival of a structure in a strong earthquake. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: agor5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NON LINEAR 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A STEEL BEAM SUBJECTED TO EQUAL AND OPPOSITE END MOMENTS DUE TO


1
NON LINEAR 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A STEEL
BEAM SUBJECTED TO EQUAL AND OPPOSITE END MOMENTS
DUE TO EARTHQUAKE FORCES
  • A PROJECT FOR MIE 605
  • BY
  • ANNAPURNA GORTHY
  • SUBMITTED TO
  • PROFESSOR IAN GROSSE
  • May 11, 1999

2
NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE
  • Prior to Northridge Earthquake, all
    beam-to-column connections in structures were
    designated as ductile moment resisting frames
    that were assumed to be capable of transferring
    the nominal plastic moment of the beams to the
    columns
  • On January 17, 1994, an earthquake and of
    magnitude 6.7 on Ritcher scale struck the Los
    Angeles area, epicenter being at Northridge,
    causing over 20 billion in damage.
  • The Northridge earthquake caused a number of
    beam-to-column welded structural connections to
    fail.
  • This project is intended to analyse a steel
    beam model designed to withstand earthquake
    forces and determining the moment carrying
    capacity of the beam with the new design.

3
EFFECT OF EARTHQUAKE FORCES ON STEEL FRAMES
  • A strong earthquake would be expected to develop
    plastic hinges at the beam ends in a traditional
    fully restrained moment frame.
  • POST-NORTHRIDGE BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTION
    DESIGN STRATEGIES FOR NEW BUILDINGS
  • Reinforcing the connection
  • Having dog bone cutouts in the beam flanges in
    the regions adjacent to the beam column
    connections
  • Both strategies effectively move the
    plastic hinge away from the face of the column,
    thus avoiding the problems related to the
    potential fragility of groove welds.

4
ADVANTAGES OF DOGBONE/REDUCED BEAM SECTIONS
  • The dogbone results in only a small reduction in
    strength and stiffness of a frame, but can
    provide a large increase in ductility, the key
    survival of a structure in a strong earthquake.
  • The dogbone does not result in a change in the
    inertia of the beam where necessary ( mid span)
    for deflection requirements.

5
TYPES OF DOGBONE
  • CONSTANT CUT
    DOGBONE
  • TAPERED CUT DOGBONE
  • RADIUS CUT DOGBONE

6
CONSTANT CUT DOGBONE
TAPERED CUT DOGBONE
2.625 in
R 20.375 in
10.45 in
FACE OF COLUMN
20 in
5 in
CENTERLINE OF DOGBONE
RADIUS CUT DOGBONE SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS
BEING USED
7
PHYSICAL SYSTEM
  • The physical system consists of a steel beam of
    length L 23 ft 276 inches, that is fixed at
    its ends to the columns and subjected to equal
    and opposite end moments.
  • The steel beam is a standard W30X99 section of 50
    ksi yield strength.

15 in (TYP)
CENTERLINE OF DOGBONE
M
M
L 23 ft
M
M
BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM
8
FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
  • The physical system shown can be represented by a
    finite element model as shown below.
  • The finite element model essentially consists of
    a cantilever beam of span L/2 23/2 feet 138
    inches ( where L is the total length of the
    beam in the physical system) and subjected to a
    concentrated load P at the free end of the
    cantilever beam, fixed at the other end
  • This arrangement essentially results in the same
    bending moment diagram for the finite element
    model as the physical system.
  • The centerline of dogbone cutout is located at a
    distance of 15 inches from the face of the column.

P
138 in L/2
M
BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM
9
TO BUILD THE PHYSICAL SYSTEM INTO A FINITE
ELEMENT MODEL EASILY, THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS
HAVE BEEN MADE
  • A cantilever beam of span length L/2 11.5 ft
    138 inches and subjected to a concentrated load
    at the free end is modeled, which essentially
    gives the same bending moment diagram as a
    fixed-fixed beam of length L (23 ft) and
    subjected to equal and opposite end moments.
  • End of the cantilever beam has been assumed to be
    rigid/fixed.
  • Elastic perfectly plastic stress strain diagram
    has been assumed for simplicity
  • Load has been modeled as a concentrated load.
  • Stress concentrations around fillets have been
    neglected.
  • Shear effects have been neglected.

10
ANSYS INPUT DATA
  • TYPE OF ANALYSIS - STATIC
    STRUCTURAL NON LINEAR

  • ANALYSIS USING BILINEAR KINEMATIC

  • HARDENING TYPE OF PLASTICITY RULE

  • PROBLEM - 3D
  • DIMENSIONALITY
  • ELEMENT TYPE - SOLID 45
    3-D 8-NODE BRICK ELEMENT

  • MESHING -
    FREE MESHING WITH SMART SIZING
  • BEAM SECTION - STANDARD
    W30X99 SECTION




11
ANSYS INPUT DATA
  • LOADING - POINT LOAD AT THE
    FREE END OF THE

  • CANTILEVER BEAM
  • CONSTRAINTS - FIXED END CONDITION

  • NON LINEAR - LARGE DEFORMATION
    EFFECTS - ON
  • ANALYSIS NEWTON RAPHSON
    OPTION - PROGRAM
  • OPTIONS EQUATION
    SOLVER - FRONTAL SOLVER

  • LOADING WITHIN A LOAD STEP - STEPPED

12
MATERIAL NON LINEARITY
E 29000
ksi Poissons ratio 0.3 Yield Stress
50 ksi Density
0.2836 lbs/ft3
13
PLASTIC STRESS
ELASTIC STRESS
STANDARD W SHAPE
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
CROSS SECTION
ELASTIC AND PLASTIC STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS IN WIDE
FLANGE
STRUCTURAL SHAPE SUBJECTED TO FLEXURE
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
FORCE
DISPLACEMENT
FORCE VS DISPLACEMENT PLOT FOR DESIGN A FINITE
ELEMENT MODEL
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
CONCLUSION
  • Maximum stress occurs at the dogbone cutout
    region.
  • Dogbone cutout has been found to be extremely
    useful in moving the plastic hinge away from the
    face of the column, and thus enabling the
    structure to withstand earthquake forces.
  • As ANSYS results are more conservative, they can
    be safely used for future work rather than
    conducting expensive experiments.

23
FUTURE WORK
  • ANALYSIS OF A COMPLETE STRUCTURAL FRAME SUBJECTED
    TO AXIAL AND TRANSVERSE LOADING.
  • PARAMETRIC MODELING OF FRAME SO THAT RADIUS CUT
    DOGBONES OF VARIOUS DIMENSIONS CAN BE TRIED OUT.
  • SUBMODELING OF THE DOGBONE CUTOUT PORTION TO GET
    MORE ACCURATE RESULTS.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com