PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE

Description:

PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE. NHS Act 1977 (as amended) ... but if the Committee is to overrule an oral hearing panel, it must give good reasons. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: mikej68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE


1
PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE
2
  • NHS Act 1977 (as amended)
  • The NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations
    2005 S.I. 2005 No. 614 as amended by S.I.
    2005/1015, 2005/1105, 2005/3315, 2005/3491,
    2006/552, 2006/913, 2006/1501, 2006/3373

3
  • Guidance Information for Primary Care Trusts
    (Control of Entry) recently amended.

4
PCTS PHARMACEUTICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT
5
The Application Form
  • No longer a prescribed form
  • Annex D and Para 3.6 to the Guidance
  • Power to set a date for applications each month
  • Power to invite applications Para 3.19

6
CHECKING THE APPLICATION
  • status of applicant see Para 3.23
  • reject if
  • not pharmacist or
  • a partnership which does not consist wholly of
    pharmacists or
  • a company which does not comply with S71 of
    Medicines Act 1968

7
FULL APPLICATIONS
8
PROCESSING A FULL APPLICATIONconsultations
Reg. 23 and Para 3.92
  • LPC, LMC, Patients Forum, any person on the
    pharmaceutical list who might be significantly
    affected, LPS providers
  • neighbouring PCTs within 2 kilometres of the
    premises
  • any other patient, consumer or community groups.

9
TIME LIMITS
  • response to be within 45 days from date
    notification sent or such longer period as the
    PCT may allow.
  • gives right to be notified of decision
  • gives right of appealN.B. Check date
    neighbouring PCT sent out consultation letter.

10
Considering the Applications
  • Hearing applications together
  • Should there be an oral hearing see reg. 24
  • Confidential information
  • Fitness to practice and information provided

11
The Principles of Natural Justice and The
Human Rights Act 1998
12
THE DECISION...
13
WHAT CAN BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT?
  • Pharmaceutical services and LPS in the
    neighbourhood - Reg 12(2)(a)
  • Reasonable choice for recipients of services and
    persons Reg 12(2)(b) see revised guidance para
    3.71 onwards
  • Any relevant information - Reg 12(2)(c)
  • Any information received as part of the
    consultation procedure Reg 12(2)(d)
  • Other proposed services Reg 12(3)

14
REGULATION 12(1)
  • an application...shall be granted ...only...if
    it is satisfied that it is necessary or desirable
    to grant the application in order to secure, in
    the neighbourhood in which the premises from
    which the applicant intends to provide the
    services are located, the adequate provision by
    persons included in a pharmaceutical list, of the
    services, or some of the services specified in
    the application.

15
THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
16
THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
  • the Cooper and Anglin case (1991)
  • the Bangor decision (1994)
  • ex p. Suri and Gompels (1994 and 1995)
  • Cribbs Causeway (1996)
  • ex p. Shah and Tescos (1997)

17
Is it necessary or desirable to secure adequate
services...?
  • What information is needed
  • How to determine adequacy
  • See guidance at para 3.90 and Annex A

18
to whom...?
  • residents?
  • workers? in the neighbourhood
  • shoppers?

19
and when...?
  • ex p. Boots (1992) (Trowbridge)
  • Cribbs Causeway
  • Gemini Park
  • look at planning situation
  • economy in the area
  • the situation on the ground.

20
IDENTICAL AND OVERLAPPING APPLICATIONS
  • where only one pharmacy is needed
  • premises
  • access
  • services to be provided
  • hours
  • choice/competition
  • time of application

21
THE DECISION
  • Has to be in writing
  • Has to give reasons
  • How to draft
  • www.nhsla.com.FHSAU/pharmacy

22
Exempt applications Regs 13 to 16 and Guidance
at Para.4.1 onwards
  • Pharmacies in large retail areas
  • Pharmacies which intend to open for more than 100
    hours a week
  • Consortia wishing to establish a new One Stop
    Primary Care Centre
  • Wholly mail order or internet based pharmacy
    services

23
PROBLEMS WITH EXEMPT APPLICATIONS
  • LPS in neighbourhood
  • Design of the premises
  • PNA requirements

24
HOURS
  • Paras 22 25 of Schedule 1 T of S
  • 40 hours unless consent of PCT or Sec of State.
  • Power to direct.
  • No longer normal hours

25
MINOR RELOCATIONS
26
R EG 6(1)where the applicant intends to change
within the neighbourhood the premises from which
he provides pharmaceutical services, being the
same services as he intends to provide from the
new premises, and the PCT is satisfied that the
change is a minor relocation and ...the provision
of pharmaceutical services will not be
interrupted (except for such period as the PCT
may for good cause allow) the PCT shall grant
the application
27
IS THE MOVE WITHIN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD?
  • see ex p. Suri and Gompels.

28
IS IT A SHORT DISTANCE?ARE THERE ANY BARRIERS?
  • see ex p. Suri and Gompels which affirmed the
    Cumbria decision

29
Will the same services be provided?Will there
be any interruption?Note restrictions on further
applications
30
EXEMPTION FROM TEST
  • Moves which satisfy the test but are less than
    500m.
  • See Reg. 6(3) and
  • Para 3.37 to 3.40

31
Minor Relocations between PCTs
  • Application dealt with under Reg 7.
  • Paras 3.41 onwards and Flow chart
  • NB Receiving PCT checks any fitness to practise
    issues

32
MAJOR RELOCATIONS
33
MAJOR RELOCATION
  • application made under Reg 5(b)(ii)
  • same test as in Reg 12
  • ex p. Tesco and Sharma (1997)

34
TIME FOR OPENING
  • Reg. 39(2) full/minor relocation grants 6
    months one or more extensions of 3 months
  • Reg. 40(1) preliminary consent 6 months BUT no
    power to extend.

35
THE APPEAL
36
  • Para 3.162 onwards for who has the right of
    appeal in what circumstances
  • the Committee can determine to hear appeals
    together even where the PCT has not exercised its
    discretion under Reg. 24(7)
  • the Committee has a discretion as to whether it
    holds an oral hearing

37
The oral hearing
  • it is by way of a complete rehearing - ex.p.
    Dixon Lane Chemists Ltd (1993)
  • composition of the panel
  • practicalities - timing, legal representation,
    who may speak, the information required, the
    documentation.

38
The decision is that of the Pharmacy Committee,
but if the Committee is to overrule an oral
hearing panel, it must give good reasons.
  • Ex.p. Dr Lowe (1999)

39
APPLICATIONS IN CONTROLLED LOCALITIES
40
RURALITY
  • Regulation 31 and Para 5.8 onwards - it is
    for the PCT to determine whether an area is
    rural in character.

41
GUIDANCE
  • What makes an area rural - see Paras 5.12
    onwards
  • a visit is vital

42
POINTS TO NOTE
  • THE PCT HAS TO DETERMINE PRECISELY THE
    BOUNDARIES OF ANY AREA OR PART OF AN AREA WHICH
    IT DETERMINES TO BE RURAL IN CHARACTER Reg 31(7)
  • THE FIVE YEAR RULE Reg 31(11)

43
APPLICATIONS BY PHARMACISTS
  • Check previous decisions - Reg 34
  • Consultations under Reg. 33.
  • Should the area be a reserved location?
  • If not, is there prejudice? Reg. 18
  • Multiply by average scripts to give idea of
    scripts/money lost
  • How will that affect doctors income?
  • Gradualisation?

44
RESERVED LOCATIONS
  • PCT shall determine whether the premises are in a
    reserved location
  • Number on all patient lists within 1.6kms is less
    that 2750 or other factors. See para 5.45
  • Do not go through the prejudice test.
  • Do go through N or D test.
  • If change and pop. rises then Prejudice test.
  • BUT prejudice does apply to 4 exemptions

45
When can doctors dispense?
  • See Reg. 60
  • A patient has serious difficulty, OR
  • lives in a controlled area more than 1.6kms from
    pharmacy OR
  • lives in a controlled area within 1.6kms and is a
    reserved location
  • AND doctor has outline consent to dispense plus
    premises approval
  • BUT see which patients are eligible

46
OUTLINE CONSENT TO DISPENSE BY DOCTORS
  • Check previous decisions under Reg 34
  • Reg. 62 and para 6.1 guidance.
  • Who must be consulted? Reg. 33
  • Reserved location determination prior to 19.1.07
  • SHALL refuse if there would be prejudice to the
    proper provision of PMS, dispensing services, LPS
    or pharmaceutical services Reg. 18

47
HOW TO CALCULATE
  • Burden is on party alleging prejudice
  • What do the parties say?
  • Problems with confidentiality
  • Target income/target numbers

48
Premises Approval
  • Transitional provisions relating to premises for
    doctor dispensing. Para 6.41 onwards.
  • Right of appeal

49
Applications in respect of existing outline
consents
  • Wish to change existing premises
  • Minor relocation
  • Move where pharmacy catches up
  • Amalgamations
  • Guidance Paras. 6.23 to 6.40 and
  • Regs. 65 and 66

50
PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com