PRECODING OF ORTHOGONAL STBC WITH CHANNEL COVARIANCE FEEDBACK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

PRECODING OF ORTHOGONAL STBC WITH CHANNEL COVARIANCE FEEDBACK

Description:

Performance of STBC over correlated fading channels. ... The unshaded bar represents the inverse of the eigenvalues. The shadowed bar represents 'water' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:220
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: commUt5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PRECODING OF ORTHOGONAL STBC WITH CHANNEL COVARIANCE FEEDBACK


1
PRECODING OF ORTHOGONAL STBC WITH CHANNEL
COVARIANCE FEEDBACK
  • Yi Zhao, Raviraj Adve and Teng Joon Lim
  • University of Toronto
  • September 6th, 2004

2
Outline
  • Background
  • Optimal Linear Transformation
  • Simplified Schemes
  • Summary

3
I. Background
4
Space-Time Block Coding
  • Advantages
  • Simple Encoding
  • Full transmit diversity
  • Linear-complexity ML decoding
  • Space-Time Coding prefers independent fading.
  • Fading correlation results in a performance loss.

5
Correlated fading
  • Performance of STBC over correlated fading
    channels.
  • Correlation matrices are based on the one-ring
    model.

6
Correlated Fading
  • With or without correlation, Space-Time Codes
    still guarantees the maximum achievable diversity
    gain.
  • However, the advantage of diversity is weakened
    by fading correlation.
  • Without channel information at the transmitter,
    full diversity is still the best choice.
  • If channel information is available at the
    transmitter, it can be used to improve
    performance. HOW?

7
II. Optimal Linear Transformation
8
Linear Transformation of STBC
  • Transmitter and receiver of the proposed system

9
Linear Transformation of STBC
  • The goal is to minimize the decoding error
    probability.
  • A performance criterion for transformation matrix
    W is given, without solution for the optimal
    matrix.
  • In general, it is extremely difficult to find the
    optimal solution for arbitrary MIMO systems.

10
MISO Systems
  • The performance criterion is simplified since
    only one antenna is used at the receiver.
  • Define a new matrix , the optimization
    problem can be translated into the same form as
    the waterfilling problem in information theory.
  • Theorem For MISO channel with correlation matrix
    , the optimal linear transformation is
    , where is a scalar related
    to SNR, is the eigenvector of , and
    is a diagonal matrix obtained by using
    waterfilling algorithm.

11
Discussions
  • Optimal transformation modulates channel symbols
    with the eigenvectors of the transmit correlation
    matrix.
  • The waterfilling process determines power
    distribution among the eigen-channels. It puts
    more power into stronger channel.

12
Discussions
  • The diversity order of the transmission is
    determined by the number of active
    eigen-channels.
  • STBC and eigen beamforming are two extreme cases
    of the transformation.

13
Performance
Performance of the optimal transformation scheme,
M2 Performance is not sensitive to the power
allocation
14
Performance
Performance of the optimal transformation scheme,
M4 Performance is sensitive to the diversity
order
15
MIMO systems
  • A widely used assumption about channel
    correlation is that it equals the product of the
    transmit and receive correlations.
  • In matrix form, we have
  • Similar to the MISO case, the optimal
    transformation matrix is still
  • while is chosen to maximize
  • under trace constraint.
  • This is a second-order waterfilling problem. It
    can be
  • solved by numerical schemes, such as SQP
    algorithm.

16
Performance
Performance of the second-order waterfilling
scheme, the numerical problem is solved by
fmincon() function in Matlab.
17
III. Simplified Schemes
18
Transmit and Receive Correlation
  • The transmitter is elevated and unobstructed. The
    receiver is surrounded by a scattering ring.
  • The downlink of a wireless communication system
  • Receive correlation is much smaller than the
    transmit ones.
  • By ignoring the receive correlation, waterfilling
    solution for MISO system is also optimal for MIMO
    systems.

19
Ignoring Receive Correlation
20
Switching Scheme
  • This simplified scheme switches between
    beamforming and STBC according to the SNR level
    and channel correlation.
  • The complexity is dramatically reduced.
  • No performance loss at low SNR. Beamforming is
    optimal.
  • Slight loss at high SNR. Full diversity is
    optimal.
  • Large loss in the transition region. The
    diversity order is wrong.

21
Switching Scheme
  • Another correlation model assumes same
    correlation between any antenna pair
  • This correlation matrix has only two eigenvalues,
    thus there is NO transition region.

22
Switching Scheme
  • Performance of the switching scheme with the
    all equal correlation model,

23
EPA Scheme
  • Switching scheme can only provide diversity order
    of 1 or M.
  • A better scheme is introduced as Equal Power
    Allocation (EPA) scheme.
  • Use the same diversity order as the optimal one.
  • Use equal power for each active eigen-channel.

24
EPA Scheme
Performance of the EPA scheme with one ring model
much better than switching
25
IV. Summary
Performance Criterion
waterfilling
2nd order waterfilling
switching
EPA
26
Thank You!
27
Illustration of Waterfilling Process
  • The process resembles pouring water into a
    vessle.
  • The unshaded bar represents the inverse of the
    eigenvalues
  • The shadowed bar represents water.
  • is the water level, set to satisfy the trace
    constraint.
  • The total amount of water is proportional to SNR .

28
Diversity Schemes
  • Diversity is essential in wireless communication
    systems to compensate multipath fading.
  • Space diversity (antenna diversity) improves the
    performance dramatically without extra bandwidth.
  • Receive diversity can be achieved by employing
    MRC receiver.
  • Transmit diversity schemes

29
Performance
  • Performance of the Alamoutis scheme
  • Same diversity gain as the MRC scheme
  • 3dB loss

30
Encoding Algorithm
  • The encoding process can be illustrated using a
    encoding Matrix
  • Each element is a combination of the channel
    signals and conjugates.
  • Each row represents a time slot
  • Each column represents a transmitting antenna
  • Rate loss

31
Capacity-Achieving Scheme
  • With channel covariance matrix available at the
    transmitter, the capacity-achieving transmission
    vector for a correlated MIMO system is a
    correlated zero-mean Gaussian vector. Its
    covariance matrix is determined by the following
    theorem
  • Theorem The capacity achieving transmission
    covariance matrix for a correlated MIMO channel
    has eigenvalue decompostion
  • where,

32
Relation to Capacity Analysis
  • Transmission over the eigenvectors of the
    transmit correlation matrix is optimal
  • Beamforming is optimal at high correlation/ low
    SNR
  • Diversity order increases with SNR
  • Full diversity is optimal in uncorrelated
    channels/ high SNR.

33
Summary
  • Contribution of the thesis
  • Provide a waterfilling solution for the optimal
    linear transformation of STBC for MISO systems.
  • Present a numerical second-order waterfilling
    solution for MIMO systems.
  • Introduce three simplified scheme (Ignoring,
    Switching, EPA) to reduce the complexity.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com