BENCHMARKING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

BENCHMARKING

Description:

Agree critical success factor for the business. Decide what ... appropriate partners leading to the stifling of lateral thinking for innovative breakthroughs. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3463
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: thaite
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BENCHMARKING


1
Competitive Benchmarking
2
STEP 1 - Planning
  • Management commitment to benchmarking
  • Agree critical success factor for the business
  • Decide what to benchmark
  • Define parameters for the study
  • Select staff
  • Plan the study

3
STEP 2 - Data Collection Research
  • Analyze and document the process internally
  • Research and identify potential benchmarking
    partners
  • Prepare interview and data exchange documentation
  • Carry out visits and collect data

4
STEP 3 - Analysis
  • Normalize data
  • Define gap between current performance and
    benchmarked performance
  • Determine causes of the gap and identify enablers
  • Set targets to close gap and exceed best
    performance
  • Adapt and refine revised practices

5
STEP 4 - Implementation Review
  • Communicate new plan and obtain approval
  • Establish implementation team
  • Produce implementation plan
  • Implement changes
  • Review performance and recalibrate benchmark
  • Continue to benchmark

6
??????????? ????????????????????????????????

Implementation Review
Plan
Data Collection Research
Analysis
7
The Four Mistakes Organizations MostOften Make -
And How to Avoid Them
  • Wrong Attitude
  • Fear and lack of understanding about
    benchmarking and lack of commitment at all levels
    of the organization.
  • Wrong Criteria
  • Incorrect identification of critical success
    factors and consequent lack of focus.

8
The Four Mistakes Organizations MostOften Make -
And How to Avoid Them
  • (Cont.)
  • Wrong Companies
  • Failure to identify appropriate partners leading
    to the stifling of lateral thinking for
    innovative breakthroughs.
  • Wrong Conclusions
  • Becoming side-tracked by a smart process in an
    unrelated or non-critical area, compounded by
    inadequate implementation planning and lack of
    follow-up.

9
????
1. ?????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????? 2.
???????????????????? ?????????????????????????????
???????????????????? ?????????????????????????
(??????????????????????) 3. ??????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????? 4. ?????????????????????
??????? ????????? ???????????????????????????????
????? ?????????????????????????????????????????
????????? ????????????
10
5. ???????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????? 6.
????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ??
??????????????????? 7. ???????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????? ??????????????????????
????????????????????????? ???????????????????????
????????????????????? 8. ?????????????????????????
?????? ??????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????
11
9. ???????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????? ????????? ??????? ???????????????????
????????? ?????????????????????
????????????????????????????? 10.
???????????????????? ????? ?????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????? ?????
??????????????????????? ???????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????
????? ??????????????????? ????????
???????????????? 2 ???????????????????
3-4-5??????? ?????????????????
12
  • ??????????? Benchmarking ?????????
  • Lack of management commitment
  • Benchmarking not understood
  • Key processes not identified
  • Cannot get resources for the project
  • Change not implemented

13
  • ??????????? Benchmarking ????????? (???)
  • Customer requirements not identified
  • Benchmarking not co-ordinated or managed
  • correctly
  • Wrong staff used
  • Changes too difficult to achieve
  • No follow-up
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com