Comparative risk assessment for GBD2000: Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparative risk assessment for GBD2000: Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption

Description:

Physical inactivity. Risk factors reported (2) Sexual and ... Hazard estimates depend on quality of supporting literature eg bp vs inactivity and diet ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: johnp53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparative risk assessment for GBD2000: Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption


1
Comparative risk assessment for GBD2000
Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption
2
Risk factors reported
  • Childhood and maternal undernutrition
  • Underweight
  • Iron deficiency
  • Vitamin A deficiency
  • Zinc deficiency
  • Other nutrition-related
  • High blood pressure
  • High cholesterol
  • High BMI
  • Low fruit and vegetable intake
  • Physical inactivity

3
Risk factors reported (2)
  • Sexual and reproductive health
  • Unsafe sex
  • Lack of contraception
  • Addictive substances
  • Tobacco
  • Alcohol
  • Illicit drugs
  • Environmental risks
  • Unsafe water, sanitation, hygiene
  • Urban outdoor air pollution
  • Indoor smoke from solid fuels
  • Lead
  • Global climate change

4
Risk factors reported (3)
  • Occupational risks
  • Risk factors for injuries
  • Carcinogens
  • Airborne particulates
  • Ergonomic stressors
  • Noise
  • Other selected risks
  • Unsafe health-care injections
  • Childhood sexual abuse

5
Key data inputs and outputs
6
(No Transcript)
7
Changes in determinants as percent of theoretical
maximum
8
The low fruit and vegetable intake component of
the GBD2000 Comparative risk assessment
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
A. High mortality developing countries
17
B. Lower mortality developing countries
18
C. Developed countries
19
Risk factors treated unevenly (Powles and Day,
Commentary)
  • Counterfactuals not specified in comparable ways
    (eg tobacco vs physical inactivity)
  • Hazard estimates depend on quality of supporting
    literature eg bp vs inactivity and diet
  • Underlying burden estimates may be defective (eg
    alcohol in China)
  • Cross-sectional design understates dynamic
    influences eg rise of obesity

20
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com