Title: Institutional Change and Development in the Middle East and North Africa
1Institutional Change andDevelopment in the
Middle East and North Africa
- Mustapha K. NabliSenior Advisor, World Bank
- Inaugural Lecture
- CREMed
- Barcelona, 7 November 2008
2Three main messages about MENA
- A development path in MENA more complex than
commonly recognized with major social and human
development achievements but daunting new labor
market and environmental challenges - The most critical challenge of institutional
change moving from an old development model to a
new and more adapted model has proven very
difficult - Root causes are to be found in the political
economy of institutional change
3OUTLINE
- I- Background and Long Run Development Outcomes
- II- A major challenge of institutional change
- III- Challenge 1 Employment and Private Sector
Development - IV. Challenge 2 Education
- V. Challenge 3 Water
- VI. Political Economy
4I. Background and Long Run Development Outcomes
- Background a diverse region
- Poverty reduction and human development major
gains - Economic growth mediocre, volatile and hesitant
5(1) A diverse region Three Major Country
Groupings
- Resource-poor, labor-abundant (RPLA) or emerging
economies Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco,
Tunisia, West Bank and Gaza Population 124 Mill.
GDP US 225 billions - Resource-rich, labor-abundant (RRLA) or
transition economies Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Syria,
Yemen - Population 168 Mill. GDP US 400
billions - Resource-rich, labor-importing (RRLI) or rich
economies GCC (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, UAE) Libya - Population 40 Mill. GDP US 666 billions
6GDP per capita 2005
7GDP per capita PPP 2005
8(2) Dramatic poverty reduction and low absolute
poverty
9 - Huge progress in terms of health indicators
Fertility, infant mortality, life expectancy
Source World Development Indicators
10(3) Economic growth mediocre and volatile
11and varied across sub-regions and countries
12II. A most critical challenge of institutional
change
- Started with an old development model based on an
unwritten social contract, with central role of
the state - Major achievements but breaks down in the 1980s
- Move to a new development model with different
role of the state and central role for
individuals, markets, private sector - Changes in many policies but failure to see
needed institutional change
13Old social contract and central role of the
state1950s to 1970s
- Institutional and policy characteristics
- Widespread state ownership of assets and limited
role of the private sector - Preference for the state and state planning
rather than markets in managing economies - Heavy inward orientation
- Strong redistribution and very active social
agenda, with state provision of public services
and safety nets - Limited political voice and participation
- Dominant role of security and military
establishments
14Major gains but crises and collapse of old social
contract- mid-1980s
- Major gains as we will see later
- First signs of difficultiesmacroeconomic crises
in the 1970s/Tunisia, Egypt - Generalized crises in the 1980s and growth bust
by the mid-1980s - Macro and structural adjustment programs since
the early 1980s
15Slow and hesitant transformation to a new social
contractsince the 1980s
- From public sector to private sector driven
Emergence of private sector - More open economies slow external liberalization
- Towards more liberalization and deregulation of
markets - More diversified economies
- Continuation of many old redistributive policies
(subsidies) - Continued limited political voice and
participation
16Failure to meet many critical challenges requires
deeper institutional change
- Employment challenge
- Higher expectations by a younger and more
educated population - Pressures of globalization
- Critical water and environmental challenges
17Critical institutions which need to change
- Transition to institutions with less prevalence
of personal exchange both in the political and
economic domains - Economic institutions with strong private
property rights, less rent-seeking, more open
markets, rules-based government regulation and
intervention - Political institutions with greater voice and
accountability
18Three case studies to illustrate
- Three recent major flagship reports by the World
Bank - Policies, Institutions and Credibility of Market
Governance in MENA Breaking through Barriers of
Private-Led growth (forthcoming) - The Road Not Traveled Education Reform in the
MENA Region (2008) - Making the Most of Scarcity Accountability for
Better Water Management Results in the Middle
East and North Africa (2007)
19III. Challenge 1 Employment and Private Sector
Development
- Slow/delayed demographic transition, surge in
labor force growth, and job creation as the most
critical challenge - Private sector development is the key to job
creation and facing the labor market pressures - Private sector has not been up to the challenge
yet
20Demographics surge in population growth followed
by steep decline
21 a delayed demographic transition leading to
major surge in labor force growth in MENA
22Three major periods
23Recent improvements in labor markets, MENA
2000-2005 Includes Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt,
Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, West Bank
and Gaza.
24Unemployment rates have fallen but remain high
25Need to create better quality jobs
26at the same time labor force growth will
continue to be high for the next 15-20 years (new
numbers)
27Private Sector is Key for Job Creation
- Challenge of Quantity of jobs, Quality, and
Flexibility and Adaptation to globalization - But performance has been weak
- Progress on reforms mixed
- Credibility of policies and reforms and
accountability remain critical issues
28Private Sector Performance (1) weak compared to
other regions
Or most recent available year.
29Private Sector Performance (2) low growth of
private investment
30Private Sector Performance (3) varied across
sub-groups of countries
31Progress on Reforms for Private Sector
Development (1)
- during the last 20-25 years efforts to increase
the role of the private sector in the economies
of the region - all countries of the region undertook to reform
their policies and institutions and made progress
in shifting their economic systems to be more
private sector market driven. - progress with reform has been mixed and varied
significantly across areas of reform, and across
individual countries and country groupings.
32Progress on Reforms for Private Sector
Development (2) Summary
33What are the possible explanations for this lack
of progress and weak response?
- Incomplete reform agenda need just to do more?
Need to overcome resistance of special interests? - Long lags in response just wait?
- More fundamental institutional problems? As
suggested by some pieces of evidence to follow.
34As evidenced by the lack of trust between public
and private sectors
35the concerns of the private sector about policy
uncertainty .
36and the negative perceptions about the
consistency and predictability in the application
of rules and regulations.
37Reforms and progress of private sector hinge on
major institutional changes
- Rules based and less discretion in the business
environment - Less room for rent-seeking and more for
innovation and entre - Greater credibility of commitment to respect of
property rights and respect of rules and
regulations
38IV. Education
- Another major challenge linked to the
demographics and employment challenge - Received high priority by governments and major
progress in terms of access - But problems with quality and weak results in
terms of efficiency - Reforms hinge on progress in accountabilities
39Major gains in access to education
Source Statistical Appendix
Source Barro and Lee (2000)
40 Good achievements in terms of the quality of
human capital
TIMSS score (math and science) 1998 and 2003
Source TIMSS 2003 Highlights
Source UNESCO Statistical Yearbook 1998 and UIS
database.
41But very low economic returns
Source Source Allen, 2001 CRESUR, 2004.
42- Despite very heavy investments by governments
(and private sector).
Source World Development Indicators, UNESCO
Institute for Statistics, UNICEF, National
Sources and Authors Calculations,
Source World Development Indicators
43..and a host of other problems going forward
- MENA countries need to deal with a youth bulge
not seen elsewhere - The challenge of globalization and the knowledge
economy - The challenge of financing education
44Reforming Incentives and Institutions of
Accountability is key
- Based on experience in the region and elsewhere
three key factors - Successful reformers have better engineering and
more aligned incentives. - The better performers engage the private sector
in providing education to a larger extent,
especially at higher levels of instruction - Countries with higher public accountability
produced better education outcomes
45Countries need to consider the following several
critical reform perspectives
-
- From Engineering Inputs to Engineering for
Results - Promoting More and Smarter Non public Provision
of Education - From Hierarchical Control to Incentive-Compatible
Contracts for the Teachers - Greater Accountability to the State versus
Accountability to the Public - Greater School Autonomy and Accountability
- Effective Information Dissemination Systems to
Promote Accountability - Quality Assurance Mechanisms
- Promoting Reforms in Migration and Labor Polices
to Maximize Returns on Education
46V. Water
- One of the most critical challenges in the region
- Becoming even more critical with impact of
climate change - Meeting the challenges illustrates the role of
institutions and institutional change
47Situation is already critical lowest water
availability in the world
Annual renewable water resources per capita
48The region has already stored almost all of the
water it can store
Proportion of regional surface freshwater
resources stored in reservoirs
49Deterioration of water quality is already costly
50Growing population will recue per capita water
availability by half by 2050 and climate change
likely to reduce rainfall by at least 20
51MENA countries are spending heavily on water
52Not getting full benefits from public investment
53Need to Reduce consumption to sustainable levels
and achieve sustainable water management at
minimal social cost
From.
To.
- Additional resources
- Conventional
- Non-conventional
- Reduce losses
54 1) Through better water policies
- Policies to limit consumption, especially in
agriculture - Investments to reduce losses
- Limit consumption
- Strong enforcement of limits
- Compensate farmers for reduced consumption with
help to improve water productivity - Mobilize additional water sources
- Better tariff policy
552) Through other interventions in non-water
sectors
Employment opportunities
Energy prices
Public finance
Trade policies
563) Through improved public accountability
57Greater accountability helps all aspects of water
management
- Improves water supply services
- Provides information necessary for making and
enforcing decisions that reflect everyones needs - Ensures that governments and service providers
see consequences of actions - Helps improve how well public money is spent
58The region has history of adapting to water
scarcity but needs major adaptation now
- Societies developed over millennia institutions
to deal with scarcity - More recently public institutions led investments
in large infrastructure systems - Institutions need to adapt now to new realities
59VI. The Political Economy of Reform
- A theory of political economy has to explain why
this slow and hesitant pace of reforms and
inability to achieve major required institutional
changes - Reforms have failed to tackle the central
challenges - Reforms have mostly relied on top down
decree-type measures, and do not threaten the
political equilibrium - Reforms which require institutional changes in
public accountability mechanisms slow and
hesitant
60The political economy of reform in MENA countries
shaped by 3 major factors
- Large oil revenues and rents
- Pervasiveness and persistence of conflict and
violence - Authoritarian political systems
61Large natural resource wealth and revenues
- Reduces incentives of rulers to seek broad-based
economic growth - Creates soft budget constraints which allow
continuation of unsustainable policies for a long
while - Creates a disconnect of accountability between
rulers and the public
62Conflicts are pervasive
- Reinforce authoritarian regimes
- Lead to allocation of large resources to security
- Creates risk aversion to reforms
63Authoritarian Regimes
64 Governance gap Indicators of governance are
well below potential in MENA.
65Authoritarian Regime Dilemma
- Benefits from stronger private sector more
growth, greater wealth base to tax, ability to
redistribute and satisfy supporters, minimize
contestation - Accrual of these benefits requires inclusive
broad-based private sector, limits on ruler
discretion - Risks to rulers greater ability of private
sector to organize and revolt against ruler if
reneges on guarantees
66Implications (1) Weak Demand for Reforms
- Collective action more costly under
non-democratic regimes - Prevalence of influence of privileged insiders
- Weak processes of internal and external
accountability more risk aversion to reforms
67Implications (2) Reforms are supply driven and
lack credibility
- Reforms are shaped to maximize the benefits to
the ruling groups, including staying in power - Lack of credibility of commitments to reform and
respect of promises
68Political Economy Calculus of Incumbent Rulers
69Implication improving governance will be
critical to move forward on more difficult
reforms.
- Regions inability to tackle deeper and more
complex reforms points to limitations of top-down
approach of reform by decree - Deeper economic reform cannot proceed without
reform of incentive structures in which reforms
are embedded - Governance reforms cannot be viewed as a separate
agenda, to be pursued at its own pace, but
integral to all other reforms.
70The most crucial and critical institutions to
focus on are
- institutions of public accountability
- institutions for the enhancement of credibility
of commitments