Title: 4.0 Nuts and Bolts of Systematic Reviews and the Campbell Collaboration Review Process
1 4.0 Nuts and Bolts of Systematic Reviews and
the Campbell Collaboration Review Process
2Eight Steps in C2 Review
- Formulate review questions
- Define inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Locate studies
- Select studies
- Assess study quality
- Extract data
- Analyze and present results
- Interpret results
3Uniformity in Protocols
- Adaptation from Cochrane
- Cover sheet
- Background
- Objectives for the Review
- Methods
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies
- Search strategy for studies
- Criteria for determination of independence of
findings - Study coding categories
- Statistical procedures and conventions
- Treatment of qualitative research
4Uniformity in Reviews
- Adaptation from Cochrane
- Cover sheet
- Background
- Objectives for the Review
- Methods
- Time frame
- Updating plans
- Acknowledgements
- Conflict of interest statement
- References
- Tables
5- Name and affiliation of primary reviewer
- Name(s) and affiliation(s) of co-reviewer(s)
- Provisional title
- Objective
- 5) Rationale for review / background
6- Method
- Types of studies included
- Types of participants included
- Types of interventions
- Types of outcomes
- Quality appraisal procedures
- Methods for data extraction
- Quality assurance procedures
w1Is this what you had in mind? w2Is it
types of outcome measures (e.g., standardized
tests) or measures (e.g., sound blending, math
computations,e tc)?? w3If this is analogous to
the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to
give an e.g.this has not been a well discussed
process in C2.
7- 7) Roles/responsibilities/expertise of review
team - Content
- Systematic review methods
- Information retrieval
- Statistical analysis (meta-analysis)
w1Is this what you had in mind? w2Is it
types of outcome measures (e.g., standardized
tests) or measures (e.g., sound blending, math
computations,e tc)?? w3If this is analogous to
the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to
give an e.g.this has not been a well discussed
process in C2.
8- Support required (any support/guidance required)
- 9) Contact details of primary reviewer
- Name
- Title
- Affiliation
- Address 1
- Address 2
- City
- State, Province or County
w1Is this what you had in mind? w2Is it
types of outcome measures (e.g., standardized
tests) or measures (e.g., sound blending, math
computations,e tc)?? w3If this is analogous to
the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to
give an e.g.this has not been a well discussed
process in C2.
9- Approximate date for submission of DRAFT PROTOCOL
(please note this should be no longer than 6
months after title approval) - 11) Approximate date for submission of DRAFT
REVIEW (please note this should be no longer than
one year after title approval)
w1Is this what you had in mind? w2Is it
types of outcome measures (e.g., standardized
tests) or measures (e.g., sound blending, math
computations,e tc)?? w3If this is analogous to
the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to
give an e.g.this has not been a well discussed
process in C2.
10An Example of a C2 Review
Herb Turner, Chad Nye, and Jamie Schwartz
March 31, 2006
11The Forest Plot
12116
116
48
48
23
23
13- How To Get Started
- on a C2 Review
14Considerations in Getting Started
- Topics
- Hot Topics
- Interest Topics
- Policy Topics
- Study Accessibility
- Available Resources
- Students
- Costs
- Time
- Collaboration