March 22, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

March 22, 2005

Description:

64 bins ATWD ch3 data for flashing DOM ... Flasher signal nearly factor of 100 ... A run similar to 1270 with clear ice above flashing DOM should be taken ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: jbr6
Category:
Tags: flashing | march

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: March 22, 2005


1
String-21 Flasher Analysis
  • Jim Braun
  • University of Wisconsin

2
How can we use flasher data?
  • String-21 geometry reasonably well understood
  • System timing
  • Provides test DOM time resolution
  • Measure precision
  • Detect systematic problems
  • Properties of hole ice
  • Differences in waveforms before and after
    freeze-in may yield insight

3
Summary of available flasher data
4
Summary of available flasher data
  • Pre-1270 runs
  • Suffer from cable bandwidth overload
  • Large gaps in data
  • Use cautiously
  • Runs 1270-1271
  • No monolith output
  • DOMs missing from upper string
  • 15 deadtime
  • 1.1ms offset between flasher timestamps and
    events

Flashing DOM
Receiving DOMs suppressed
5
SPS runs 1270 1271
  • DOM 39 (2095m) chosen randomly as flasher
  • Perhaps not a good choice from standpoint of
    system timing!

6
SPS run 1270 Analysis
  • Use raw TestDAQ data
  • Must apply trigger
  • Require 4 hits within 6ms
  • Events observed first by DOM 38 are flasher
    events
  • Flasher rate - 610 Hz
  • Data Format
  • 32 bins ATWD ch0 data for receiving DOMs
  • 64 bins ATWD ch3 data for flashing DOM
  • By disabling partner of flashing DOM, cable
    bandwidth of flashing DOM approximately
    equivalent to bandwidth of receiving DOMs
  • Event rate is 515Hz

7
Run 1270 waveforms
8
SPS run 1270
  • Flasher signal nearly factor of 100 stronger than
    background
  • Most DOMs at top of string not present
  • Isolated Q2 glitch
  • DOM 40 disabled to maximize cable bandwidth for
    DOM 39
  • Dust attenuation is apparent
  • .1 SPE reached at DOMs 33 and 56
  • Light directed upward is suppressed

DOM 40 disabled
9
SPS run 1270
  • Large number of low multiplicity IceTop events
  • Typical flasher event seen by 15 DOMs
  • Vertical pulse propagation of 120m
  • Less deadtime shifts distribution toward higher
    multiplicity

Flasher Events
IceTop noise
10
SPS run 1270
  • Time between flash and observation increases
    somewhat linearly for DOMs away from flasher
  • Subtle convex nonlinearity near flashing DOM

Nonlinearity near flasher
11
System Timing
A simple test
DOMi-2
  • Enable flasher board on DOMi
  • Calculate pulse arrival time differences between
    the two DOMs directly above with good statistics
    (105 events)
  • Requires time-calibrated raw timestamp and
    discriminator crossing analysis of ATWD data for
    precision
  • Width of distribution is characteristic of timing
    precision
  • Mean of distribution is characteristic of optical
    distance between DOMs

DOMi-1
DOMi
12
System Timing
  • Factors affecting width
  • PMT response
  • ATWD bin resolution (3.5ns/bin)
  • RapCal precision
  • Factors affecting mean
  • DOM spacing
  • RapCal systematic accuracy
  • Ice properties

13
SPS run 1270
17m
17m
  • RMS Dt 6.3ns
  • 37 38
  • Mean Dt 87ns
  • equivalent to 20m path length difference in ice
  • Why not 17m?
  • Probably an effect of dust layer
  • Need to understand this

14
Where do we go from here?
  • More data!
  • A run similar to 1270 with clear ice above
    flashing DOM should be taken
  • Need ability to adjust flasher rate
  • Need to understand flasher timestamp offset
  • Pre/post freeze-in waveform analysis
  • Understand hole ice
  • Pre-1270 waveforms are still OK
  • Photonics simulation?
  • Need to understand propagation of flasher pulse
    in dust layer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com