NERT RSA Electricity Status Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

NERT RSA Electricity Status Report

Description:

Managing the RSA Electricity Crisis. Identify the Critical Performance Areas ... To communicate a timeous and consistent message to all the stakeholders across ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Corp258
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NERT RSA Electricity Status Report


1
NERTRSA Electricity Status Report
August 2008
2
Managing the RSA Electricity Crisis
  • Identify the Critical Performance Areas (CPA) X
    12
  • Understand the Context each CPA
  • KPIs
  • Targets
  • Constraints
  • Initiatives
  • Hard
  • Soft
  • Facts/Assumptions/Measurements
  • Communicating (Data/Trends/Issues/Solutions etc)
  • Links to other Agencies
  • Assign Role Responsibilities for each CPA

3
CPA - Risk Watch Report 22 August 2008
Work Stream Focus Areas?
Road Failure?
Baseline Mandatory Rules?
Advisory Council ? PMU ?
Slow/No Response?
PMU for Skills?
Regulatory Response and 2009 Elections?
4
Reliability of Gx Supply
Generation Actual Load Losses
Load losses - Increasing trend Not meeting set
targets RTS (Camden) - High unavailability SSCs -
Causing disruptions Summer 08/09 very tight. NB
Cyclical load losses increase this time of the
year. Of concern - Current month increasing trend
worse than historical trend, and starting to
occur sooner than normal.
5
Reliability of Tx Supply
6
Eskom Coal Supply Situation
25.9 days as at 05 Aug 08
Risks Impact on roads due to high reliance on
road transport
5
7
Power Conservation Status
Energy Savings in Percentage
8
Top 12 Metros Energy Demand
  • Actual Energy demand in April was between 8 and
    9 lower than forecast. This includes load
    shedding.
  • Adding back load shedding the saving against
    forecast is probably between 4 and 6.

9
Implementing ECS will not be easy due to
regulatory issues, customer ability to capture
savings and uneven distributor readiness
Challenge
Description
Implication
Lengthy regulation process
  • Regulatory changes required before enactment
  • This requires extensive stakeholder participation
    and lengthy processes
  • It will take at least 2-4 months before ECS can
    be made mandatory
  • The initial phase of ECS is voluntary, and does
    not have the desired effect

Ability of customers to capture savings
  • Although most consumers can capture savings,
    implementing such measures will take time and
    effort
  • This will have significant economic impact, as
    customers may be forced to cut production to
    achieve savings
  • The delay in capture could be compensated for by
  • Providing trading as an option in ECS
  • Encouraging customers to generate their own
    electricity

Distributor readiness
  • There are over 180 distributors, with
    non-standard operating systems
  • Organisational and operational changes required
    to monitor ECS will be complex and difficult to
    implement at the same pace across customers
  • High risk that customers will receive
    inconsistent treatment across distributors
    regarding ECS
  • A phased roll-out is recommended to ensure
    consistency and capacity of distributors

10
TIMELINE - ROLL-OUT OF VOLUNTARY AND MANDATORY
ECS PROGRAMS
Pre-July 2008
July 1st Oct 1st
Oct 1st end 2008
2009 and beyond
Pre-ECS
Voluntary ECS
Mandatory ECS
Full ECS / DSM
  • Savings primarily driven by large industrial
    customers
  • Savings purely voluntary
  • Formalised ECS program rolled out starting with
    larger customers, and increasingly covering
    smaller and smaller customers
  • Initially no penalties or incentives, but the
    program provides opportunity for industrials to
    have a head start
  • Upon successful passing of legislation or
    introduction of sufficient pricing regulation,
    ECS able to provide incentives and penalties
  • Will include trading on a multi-lateral basis for
    further incentives
  • Full ECS roll-out and implementation to all
    applicable customers
  • Full DSM effort for all other customers

Will require introduction of either legislation
or pricing regulations to enable formalisation of
the mandatory program
Will require successful systems roll-out at both
Eskom and the municipalities to capture all
target customers in full ECS
11
Managing the Crisis
  • RFP to establish the PMU Closes 25 August 2008.
  • Identify and Establish Work Streams Urgent and
    Important

12
Workstream 1 - Communication
  • Mandate
  • To review the current communication protocols
    with a view of improving the delivery of load
    shedding messages
  • Objectives
  • To communicate in context - the state of
    electricity supply (eg emergency, recovery,
    short, medium, long term)
  • To communicate a timeous and consistent message
    to all the stakeholders across all the
    communication channels under Eskom control
  • To extend the reach of the Eskom Distribution
    communication value chain to include all large /
    industrial embedded customers
  • To continuously improve the performance of the
    recovery state communication in partnership with
    the Eskom internal and external stakeholders

13
RSA Electricity Demand Growth Critical Issues
  • Ratio GDP Electricity growth rates?
  • Changing electricity consumption fundamentals
  • Other Generators?

14
RSA Electricity Demand Growth
15
New Connections
5 demand savings
10 demand savings
Net reserve margin expected to get progressively
worse!
Eskom base case
Net capacity reserve margin
Key assumptions
  • Growth 4 p.a.
  • Supply side assumptions
  • Eskom supply base case plans including Medupi,
    Bravo and Mmamabula (2013)
  • Excluding UCG at Majuba, extra wind capacity,
    OCGT/CCGT conversions, Co-Gen and DME IPP
  • Demand savings calculation
  • Annual energy is reduced by 5 or 10, and then
    the peak demand is calculated to derive the
    projected reserve margin

03
05
07
09
11
13
15
16
Energy Conservation Scheme Proposed
Decision tree
Core focus of ECS
Initiatives
Levers
Implementation approach
?
  • Primary energy

Limited contribution in short term (6-12 mths)
Increase supply
?
  • Co-gen/IPP/MTPPP

?
Significant contribution in short term (6-12 mths)
ECS will encourage uptake of DSM and some co-gen
  • New build RTS

How can South Africa reduce the shortfall of
26TWh/ 3,000MW in the short-medium term required
to stabilise system and create sufficient buffer
for new growth?
  • Maintenance
  • Plant efficiency
  • Voluntary reduction by consumer
  • Load shedding

Reduce demand
?
  • Power buy-backs
  • Increase pricing (modify behaviour and encourage
    efficiency)

Degree of intensity
  • Energy Conservation (through DSM co-gen)

Either of these options would address the energy
crisis, however each has varying implications and
consequences to the economy
  • Standard Tariff adjustments under current
    regulations excluded from PCP scope.
  • Only price deviations (penalties/ incentives)
    from current tariffs will be considered as part
    of PCP
  • Mandatory regulations to reduce demand (ECS)

17
Eskoms Progress on Key Activities for
Implementation of the Initial Voluntary Scheme
Completed
Descriptions
Status
Comments
  • Facilitate discussions with NERSA and DME to
    ensure regulations in place for ECS
  • Working with DME and NERSA to secure legislative
    and regulatory enablers
  • Expand and finalise rules for initial phase
  • Rules for initial phase have been developed and
    agreed
  • Identify target customer groups to inform phasing
    approach
  • Customers participating in initial phase
    identified and baseline data extracted
  • Develop new operational systems and process to
    support ECS
  • Develop relevant people through training
  • Systems and process implemented
  • Customer managers have undergone required training
  • Operational readiness of municipalities
  • Unlikely that municipalities will be ready to
    implement initial phase
  • Lack of formal governance and regulations have
    contributed to delayed progress
  • Develop authorisation and decision-making
    structures in Eskom for ECS
  • ECS governance teams have been approved and are
    operational
  • Engage key customers and communicate broadly on
    ECS
  • In the process of engaging customers on ECS and
    finalisation of baselines
  • Support government in developing and implementing
    framework for new connections
  • New connections strategy developed
  • Engagement process underway with dti to finalise
    proposed strategy
  • Ensure alignment with government and obtain final
    approval
  • Governance process with NERT is still to be
    finalised

18
New connections below 50MVA will continue to be
connected, but large projects (gt50MVA) will phased
Actively enforced/managed
Indirectly manages e.g., mass communication,
education
Not enforced/managed
Require ECS compliance
Connect immediately
Enforce DSM
Objective
Re-phase
Category
1
  • Manage (demand) electricity growth with as little
    intervention as possible, to reduce implications
    for the economy
  • Hardwire and integrate ECS principles into growth
    as far as possible
  • Optimise approach for differentiated customer base
  • Small (1 MVA) and micro (100 kVA)
  • Bulk of Dx and municipality customers
  • Total capacity relatively low

2
  • Medium-sized projects/(1-50 MVA) connections
  • Several hundred
  • Mostly in distribution and munics (large
    customers)
  • Large projects/connections (50 MVA)
  • Mostly related to the large industrial consumers
  • Projects are fewer and can be managed at a
    portfolio level

3
Requirement to implement ECS savings on
current consumption Phase projects start
dates in line with availability of new supply
17
19
IPP and Co-Generation
  • Barriers to entry for potential co-generators
  • Co-gen feed in rates
  • Bilateral negotiations with Eskom for a fair
    price to ensure bankability proved to be
    extremely difficult, resource intensive and time
    consuming, irrespective of the obvious need for
    investment in electricity generation.
  • Publication of MTPPP prices was a big step
    forward.  In its submission to NERSA Eskom
    proposed to offer the minimum of the band for
    both the SRMC and LRMC profiles (65c/kWh and
    35c/kWh).  It may be more appropriate, given the
    supply situation, to be more bold and offer a
    price in the middle of the range (80c and 42c)
  • The 2012 and 2018 deadlines in the MTPPP could be
    extended, given the threats of schedule slippage
    in the build program, and the Mamabula delay or
    cancellation.
  • Lack of resources to pursue co-gen opportunities
  • Not core business of large power users, have to
    manage severe internal skills shortages
  • Complexities of integration into production
    process can easily be underestimated.  A lot of
    front-end loading and detailed engineering are
    required, versus matching an off-the-shelf
    power station to the fuel spec for a green fields
    power station.  It is not true that co-gen is
    necessarily cheaper and faster than green fields,
    but it is cleaner.
  • Asymmetry of risk uptake between buyer and seller
  • Eskom commercial and legal processes (inflexible,
    take it of leave it attitude).  A lot of the
    requirements are unnecessary for projects
    financed directly from balance sheets of seller.
  • Example Liquidated damages, versus no real
    damages to buyer in current situation
  • No provision for fact that co-generation under
    delivery may coincide with demand reduction from
    industrial process, leaving Eskom neutral
  • Resistance from co-generators to accept risk in
    current situation (Knee jerk reaction We are
    helping Eskom, and they should accommodate us.
     They dont pay penalties if we are load shed,
    but we must pay penalties if we cant deliver,
    etc. etc.)
  • Under the MTPPP an under-delivery in one year
    leads to less income for the co-generator
    (correct), but also to penalties in the following
    year (more difficult to swallow)
  • List of more detailed comments on proforma MTPPP
    PPA attached below
  • Permitting challenges Proposals on how to fast
    track
  • EIAs DEAT to set up special panel to fast track
    co-gen applications.  
  • NERSA to issue preliminary license approvals, for
    paper work to happen in parallel to project
    execution

20
Eskom's Financial Governance Health
Tariff restructuring plan schedule for 2008/9
Aug-08
Start Mar-08 The NERSA decision
21
Primary energy costs
Primary energy costs
  • Increased utilisation of individual stations due
    to inadequate reserve margin
  • Dedicated collieries used above contractual
    volumes
  • 85 of all coal purchased from top 3 coal
    suppliers
  • Increased utilisation of short term contracts
  • Increased from 2 in 2001 to 21 in 2008
  • Higher cost due to road transportation
  • High utilization of diesel fired Open Cycle Gas
    Turbines

22
The funding challenge
  • Significant tariff increases by NERSA
  • Pass-through of prudent costs accepted as a
    principal
  • 20-25 per annum in the next 3 years
  • Significant shareholder support
  • R60bn committed
  • Significant borrowings
  • Up to R150bn both local and foreign in the next 5
    years

Lima Pumped storage scheme 1 500MW
Ingula Pumped storage scheme 1
352MW
Bravo (coal) 4 818MW
Medupi Coal 4 788MW
23
Eskom New Build Program1
Projects totalling R260 billion approved since
2004
Open-cycle gas turbines 2 078MW
Return to service stations 3600MW
Ingula Pumped storage scheme 1
352MW
18 886 MW of power generation capacity committed
since 2004
  • Return to service stations 3 600MW
  • Open-cycle gas turbines 2 078MW
  • Ingula Pumped storage 1 352MW
  • Medupi Coal 4 788MW
  • Renewable wind facility 100MW
  • Bravo Coal 4 818MW

Renewable 100MW Wind facility
Bravo (coal) 4 818MW
Medupi Coal 4 788MW
24
Eskom New Build Program2
25
Skills
26
Expedite the national initiative for skills
development (academic artisan levels).
  • Eskom understands the skills crisis currently
    being faced by the country. In response, it has
    been actively involved in various initiatives to
    alleviate the crisis. These include
  • Spending R 1.2 billion per year on education,
    training development of staff, trainees
    bursars
  • Establishing Eskom University (in progress)
  • Joint initiatives with other State Owned
    Enterprises (eg Denel) in training initiatives
  • The Eskom schools programme aimed at attracting
    resources to required skills
  • The adoption of three FET colleges (KZN, Limpopo
    and Gauteng)
  • Involvement with various bodies that are
    addressing the problem, including JIPSA/AGSISA,
    DPE, SAPRO, ITT and E-Seta.
  • Sponsorship of academic shares due to a lack of
    funding by these institutions to attract and
    retain academic staff.
  • The skills shortage is a national problem and
    despite Eskoms initiatives to address the
    problem, real progress will only be made if the
    National initiative for skills development
    (academic and artisan level) is expedited, and if
    financial support for the development of
    technical skills is increased.

25
27
Eskom Key Skills requirements 2008 - 2014
  • 2500 Engineers (including Project managers)
  • 250 Technologists
  • 1000 Technicians
  • 5000 Artisans
  • 500 Accountants/Commercial

28
Regulatory Governance
29
Elimination of blockages
  • Key areas of concern, tabled for Government to
    play a mitigating role
  • Award of mining rights
  • Funding for road repair
  • Expediting skills development
  • Streamlining Environmental Impact Assessments
  • These are discussed in more detail in the slides
    that follow.

28
30
Constraints that need to be addressed
31
Road Repair - Background
  • The National and Provincial roads network in
    Mpumalanga utilised by Eskom for haulage of coal
    in desperate need of repair, deteriorating at a
    rapid rate.
  • Eskom has been involved in numerous discussions
    with Government at the highest levels to find a
    solution, these interventions have failed to
    yield the desired result.
  • In December 2006, Eskom (GPE) undertook a
    comprehensive assessment on the condition of
    current and future coal haul routes. Total cost
    estimated at R3,5 billion.
  • DRT at the time disclosed that funding was not
    available to repair the roads, while SANRAL had
    only limited funding available dedicated to other
    projects.
  • The findings of the study were presented to the
    Mpumalanga Local Government EXCO. The committee
    indicated that it did not expect a favourable
    response from National Treasury.

32
Funding for Road Repair Phase 2 Strategy
  • A May 2008 study indicates total expenditure to
    repair coal haul routes of R10 billion (vs R3,6
    billion in December 2006) over a period of 5
    years.
  • R3 billion currently required for Category 1
    roads, with provision included for interim
    maintenance on Category 2 3 roads.
  • Increase in cost can be ascribed to
  • Increase in construction cost
  • Oil price fluctuation (linked to the price of
    bitumen)
  • Deteriorating road conditions
  • Construction cost is based on current contracted
    rates and compared to SANRAL rates.
  • Assumed that all roads will be designed to
    accommodate current traffic loading and vehicle
    configurations.

33
Environmental Impact Assessments
  • Transmission lines for Medupi as there are tight
    deadlines
  • The volume of EIAs required for co-generation
    and medium term power purchase programmes will
    increase substantially by the end of 2008.
  • EIA's and related servitude acquisition for power
    lines remain an on-going priority and focus area
    for Eskom as they form an integral part of the
    new build programme.
  • There is a degree of uncertainty in the time
    frames required for conducting EIAs particularly
    as a result of potential appeals from interested
    and affected parties. As a result Eskom has for
    the last three years been tracking all EIA's for
    capital expansion projects in conjunction with
    the Department of Environmental Affairs and
    Tourism (DEAT) and the Department of Public
    Enterprises (DPE).
  • Various committees and structures and additional
    resources have been put in place to deal with the
    increase in volume of applications.
  • Eskom also feeds back on progress and possible
    barriers to the Forum for Executives in Energy
    which also includes the Department of Minerals
    and Energy and the National Energy Regulator of
    South Africa.

32
34
Population of the Proposed Work streams
35
END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com