Experimental Analysis of TCP Spurious Retransmission Timeout in 3G3.5G networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Experimental Analysis of TCP Spurious Retransmission Timeout in 3G3.5G networks

Description:

Telematics Lab - Politecnico di Bari ... Presentation of Poliba's Telematics lab ... Telematics Lab is a research laboratory at the Electrical & Electronics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:339
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: IMF6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experimental Analysis of TCP Spurious Retransmission Timeout in 3G3.5G networks


1
Experimental Analysis of TCP Spurious
Retransmission Time-out in 3G/3.5G networks
Gennaro Boggia, Antonio Barbuzzi Assistant
Professor, PhD student Telematics Lab -
Politecnico di Bari
Paolo Dini Research Associate IP Technologies
Area - CTTC
2
Outline
  • Introduction to COST TMA (Data Traffic Monitoring
    and Analysis)
  • Collaboration between Poliba and CTTC
  • Presentation of Polibas Telematics lab
  • Statement of the Spurious Retransmission Time-Out
    problem in TCP connections
  • Testbed design and development
  • Experimental result analysis
  • Conclusions and future work

3
Outline
  • Introduction to COST TMA (Data Traffic Monitoring
    and Analysis)
  • Collaboration between Poliba and CTTC
  • Presentation of Polibas Telematics lab
  • Statement of the Spurious Retransmission Time-Out
    problem in TCP connections
  • Testbed design and development
  • Experimental result analysis
  • Conclusions and future work

4
COST Action IC0703 Data Traffic Monitoring and
Analysis
  • Understanding, developing and managing modern
    packet networks is difficult and expensive
  • Traffic monitoring and analysis has always been
    seen as a key methodology to understand
    telecommunication technology and operation
  • TMA COST Action aims at coordinating and
    promoting the development of common and novel
    monitoring tools and analysis platforms, so as to
    catalyze the emergence of a European de-facto
    standard for traffic monitoring

5
COST Action IC0703 Data Traffic Monitoring and
Analysis
  • Collaboration between IPTech (CTTC) and
    Telematics Lab (Poliba)
  • Experimental study of TCP over 3G/3.5G network
  • First identified problem Spurious Retransmission
    Time-Out (SRTO)
  • Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM)
  • Antonio Barbuzzi
  • - Title Measurements of TCP performances over
    3/3.5G wireless networks- Date 11/01/2009 -
    28/02/2009 (extended to 13/03/2009)- Home
    institution Politecnico di Bari, Italy- Host
    institution Centre Tecnològic de
    Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC), Spain

6
Telematics Lab - General Description
  • Telematics Lab is a research laboratory at the
    Electrical Electronics Engineering Department
    (DEE) of Politecnico di Bari, the Technical
    University of Bari.
  • Its mission is the research on the most relevant
    technologies in the area of telecommunication
    networks.

7
Main Research Areas
  • Multimedia Systems
  • Multimedia Streaming using quality adaptive
    encoding schemes
  • Bandwidth estimation algorithms for Admission
    Control
  • QoS in wireless LAN/PAN
  • Feedback-based bandwidth allocation algorithms in
    wireless networks (IEEE 802.11, 802.15.3, etc.)
  • Active and Passive measurements in 3G
  • measurements to infer parameter settings in 3G
    network
  • performance analysis
  • Wireless Sensor Networks for detecting adverse
    events
  • energy efficient architectures for event
    detection
  • analytical modeling
  • Networked Control Systems
  • Architectures for real-time communications in
    factory environment
  • Wireless network for system control

8
People
Full Professor
PhD Students
Pietro Camarda
Antonio Barbuzzi
Francesco Capozzi
Claudia Cormio
Assistant Professor
Gennaro Boggia
Rossella Fortuna
Luigi Alfredo Grieco
Roberta Laraspata
Maria Rita Palattella
Domenico Striccoli
Carla Passiatore
Post-Doc
Giuseppe Piro
Roberto DellAquila
Visiting Researcher
Giammarco Zacheo
Alessandro DAlconzo
9
International Cooperation
  • FTW at Vienna (Austria)
  • Nokia Siemens Network at Aalborg (Denmark)
  • CTTC at Barcelona (Spain)
  • VTT at Oulu (Finland)
  • INRIA at Sophia Antipolis (France)

10
Some projects
  • Some recent projects (most of them funded by
    Apulia Region)
  • COST Action IC0703, Data Traffic Monitoring and
    Analysis theory, techniques, tools and
    applications for the future networks,. Chair F.
    Ricciato, University of Salento, FTW (Vienna),
    2007-2012.
  • Apulia Regional Strategic Proj., PS 121 -
    Telecommunication Facilities and Wireless Sensor
    Networks in Emergency Management, Chair Prof.
    B. Maione, Politecnico di Bari, 2006-2009.
  • Apulia Reg. Strategic Proj., PS 092 -
    Distributed Production to Innovative System
    DIPIS, Chiar Prof. G. Visaggio, University of
    Bari, 2006-2009.
  • Apulian Reg. Operative Prog. 2000-2006,
    Monitoring and Adaptive Control Mobility of
    dangerous material, Chair Prof. G. Visaggio,
    University di Bari, 2007-2008.
  • Apulian Reg. Operative Prog. 2000-2006,
    Terrestrial Digital Platform for Television
    Services with high Social Impact, Actuator
    CO.S.TE, 2007-2008.
  • Apulia Reg. Explorative Proj., ICT Technologies
    for tracking food farming with RFID tags, Chair
    Prof. P. Camarda, Politecnico di Bari, 2007.
  • Apulia Reg. Explorative Proj., ICT Technologies
    for tourist assistance based on an interactive
    virtual guide, Chair Prof. G. Piscitelli,
    Politecnico di Bari, 2007.
  • Apulian Reg. Operative Prog. 2000-2006, Robotic
    Systems for Micro Assembly, in cooperation with
    Masmec S.r.l Italy. Chair. Prof. L. Salvatore,
    Politecnico di Bari, 2006-2007.
  • Apulian Reg. Operative Prog. 2000-2006, Wireless
    Communication Systems for Industrial Automation,
    in cooperation with Masmec S.r.l Italy. Chair.
    Prof. P. Camarda, Politecnico di Bari, 2006-2007.

11
Outline
  • Introduction to COST TMA (Data Traffic Monitoring
    and Analysis)
  • Collaboration between Poliba and CTTC
  • Presentation of Polibas Telematics lab
  • Statement of the Spurious Retransmission Time-Out
    problem in TCP connections
  • Testbed design and development
  • Experimental result analysis
  • Conclusions and future work

12
Recalling TCP behavior
  • As well known, TCP
  • uses a retransmission timer when expecting an
    acknowledgment (ACK) for a given segment
  • the ACK should arrive before the RTO
    (Retransmission TimeOut)
  • the RTO is evaluated as RTO SRTT 4 DEV
  • where SRTT estimated Round Trip Time DEV RTT
    standard deviation

13
SRTO definition
  • A spurious timeout happens in case of a sudden
    delay spike on the link, where the round-trip
    time exceeds the expected value calculated for
    the retransmission timeout.
  • ACK is received after the retransmission of the
    segment

Receiver
Ack. Numb. 3000
Seq. Numb. 1500
Seq. Numb. 1
Seq. Numb. 1500
Ack. Numb. 1500
Sender
RTO
14
Effects of SRTO
  • TCP retransmits the oldest outstanding segment
    (not lost, but delayed)
  • The retransmission is unnecessary (the segment
    has been received)
  • The sender interprets the received ACK as related
    to the retransmission
  • TCP retransmits all outstanding segments (slow
    start algorithm)
  • Retransmitted segments generate 3DUPACKs and a
    spurious fast retransmit
  • Transmission of new segments are delayed

- A. Gurtov, R. Ludwig, Responding to Spurious
Timeouts in TCP, In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, Mar.
2003
15
Some remarks on SRTO
  • Pronounced RTT variations can fire RTO even in
    absence of packet loss (i.e., a SRTO)
  • Standard TCP flavors are not able to distinguish
    between SRTOs and normal RTOs due to packet
    losses
  • An SRTO implies
  • unnecessary retransmission of segments which
    already arrived successfully at the receiver
    beforehand
  • unnecessary reduction of the congestion window
  • several 3 DUPACKs with consequent congestion
    window reduction
  • Frequent SRTOs can significantly degrades network
    performance and TCP throughput.

16
SRTO in 3G/3.5G network
  • In a cellular network (3G/3.5G) a SRTO can be due
    to
  • mobility the mobile terminal may experience
    handovers with consequent signaling and packet
    storage
  • propagation a sudden change in radio conditions
    usually causing a spike in the RTT of stored
    packets (retransmissions at link layer)
  • priority a sudden increase of high priority
    traffic (voice) reduces resources available for
    data traffic
  • configuration some buffers in the core network
    can be overdimensioned
  • cell state the mobile terminal switches to
    another channel

17
How to reveal a SRTO
  • There are no algorithms (sender side) that
    reveal all possible SRTOs. To this aim, we need
    to look at both sender and receiver sides.
  • D-SACK option
  • duplicated segments are signaled
  • extension of the well-known TCP SACK option
  • the SRTO is revealed only when at reception of
    the first ACK of the retransmitted segment
  • Eifel Algorithm
  • it reveals SRTOs and can react to them
  • TCP timestamp option is used
  • it works if some ACKs are lost
  • F-RTO
  • no TCP options are required
  • sometimes SRTOs are not revealed
  • the segment transmission can go on without
    congestion window reduction

18
Outline
  • Introduction to COST TMA (Data Traffic Monitoring
    and Analysis)
  • Collaboration between Poliba and CTTC
  • Presentation of Polibas Telematics lab
  • Statement of the Spurious Retransmission Time-Out
    problem in TCP connections
  • Testbed design and development
  • Experimental result analysis
  • Conclusions and future work

19
Testbed
  • The mobile station and the wired host are on the
    same physical machine
  • A single clock allows us to calculate the end to
    end delay (NTP would be an alternative)
  • To simplify the realization of the testbed in
    different environments (we dont have always two
    machines)
  • Elimination of synchronization issues

M
H
W
Internet
Mobile Station
Wired Host
20
Loopback Avoidance (I)
  • Locally originated traffic with local IP address
    as destination would be delivered through the
    loopback interface
  • The original addresses of each interface is
    changed to a fictitious one.
  • Packets exiting from each interface need to have
    the real source address
  • A rule in the NAT table in the POSTROUTING chain
    change source IP to the real IP
  • Also a fictitious router is used for the Ethernet
    path
  • Packets coming to the interfaces need to have the
    fictitious IP as destination
  • A rule in the NAT table in PREROUTING chain
    changes the source IP to the fictitious one

21
Loopback Avoidance (II)
  • The host needs to know the MAC address of the
    Ethernet router
  • Static entry in the MAC table
  • The Ethernet router needs to know the MAC address
    of the laptop
  • We cant control this router ?
  • Incoming ARP requests are modified to have
    fictitious IP addresses
  • Outgoing ARP replies are modified to have real IP
    addresses
  • The packets needs to flow through the internet
  • Routing tables rule sent packets with real UMTS
    IP address destination through the Ethernet card
    and vice versa.
  • Alternative solutions
  • Raw sockets (but would require a userspace TCP
    implementation)
  • The use of two different hosts

22
Loopback Avoidance (III)
ppp0
eth0
Fake Eth0 IP.src ? Real ppp0 IP.dst
Real Eth0 IP.src ? Fake ppp0 IP.dst
Fake ppp0 IP.src ? Real Eth0 IP.dst
Real ppp0 IP.src ? Fake Eth0 IP.dst
POSTROUTING
Kernel Space Outside
PREROUTING
POSTROUTING
PREROUTING
Real ppp0 IP.src ? Real Eth0 IP.dst
Real ppp0 IP.src ? Real Eth0 IP.dst
Real Eth0 IP.src ? Real ppp0 IP.dst
Real Eth0 IP.src ? Real ppp0 IP.dst
23
Access to TCP Internals States Web100 patch
  • The Web100 software implements instruments in the
    Linux TCP/IP stack.
  • kernel patch adding the instruments
  • suite of "userland" libraries and tools for
    accessing the kernel instrumentation.
  • we have developed a python script to save all the
    tcp parameters exposed by web100 in a
    asynchronous way
  • Instantaneous values of Cwnd, SampleRTT, Smoothed
    RTT, RTO, etc
  • Access to RTO events needs to be synchronous
  • Patch in the TCP retransmit timer handler to
    record sequence number, wcid, timestamps of each
    RTO

24
Execution of the tests iperf
  • The TCP flows are generated using Iperf
  • Iperf is a commonly used network testing tool
    that can create TCP and UDP data streams and
    measure the throughput of a network that is
    carrying them (wikipedia)
  • Causes for rate limitation
  • Application (low rate or burst traffic
    generation)
  • Limited Receiver Buffer (erroneous settings)
  • Full Receiver Buffer (the application empties the
    buffer too slowly, because it has to write
    receiver data on the disk, or its engaged in
    other jobs)
  • Network Limitation (bandwidth, packet loss)
  • Using iperf our tests should be limited only by
    the network.

25
Some details
  • UMTS Rel. 5
  • Linux kernel 2.6.27-web100 kernel
  • TCP Reno with default parameters
  • Sack
  • Dsack
  • Timestamp Option
  • Windows Scaling Option,
  • cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp
  • 1h TCP/IP Flow
  • The traffic of each interface is dumped. To
    reduce discarded packets
  • Snaplen limited to Layer2 header (14-16B) IP
    Header (20B) TCP header (20B) TCP Option
    Header (40B)

26
An algorithm for distinguish SRTOs and NRTOs
  • Given the sequence number and the timestamp TRTO
    of a RTO, how to distinguish between NRTO e SRTO?
  • Find IP.id of the segment that caused the RTO on
    the Sender Side (A)
  • Find the correspondent segment (having the same
    TCP.seq and IP.id) on the receiver (B). If lost
    ? NRTO
  • Find IP.id of the correspondent ACK on B
  • Find the timestamp T5 of the received ACK on A.
    If lost ? NRTO
  • If T5 gt TRTO ? SRTO else ? NRTO

27
Outline
  • Introduction to COST TMA (Data Traffic Monitoring
    and Analysis)
  • Collaboration between Poliba and CTTC
  • Presentation of Polibas Telematics lab
  • Statement of the Spurious Retransmission Time-Out
    problem in TCP connections
  • Testbed design and development
  • Analysis of the experimental results
  • Conclusions and future work

28
Commercial Network - Download Case (I)
29
Commercial Network - Download Case (II)
30
Commercial Network - Upload Case (I)
31
Commercial Network - Upload Case (II)
32
Packet Losses
33
A Comparison of Different Network Operators
34
Outline
  • Introduction to COST TMA (Data Traffic Monitoring
    and Analysis)
  • Collaboration between Poliba and CTTC
  • Presentation of Polibas Telematics lab
  • Statement of the Spurious Retransmission Time-Out
    problem in TCP connections
  • Testbed design and development
  • Experimental result analysis
  • Conclusions and future work

35
Conclusions and Future Work
  • SRTO is only a problem in a congested cell (Bari
    experiment)
  • Identification of the location of the congestion
  • Radio interface
  • Wired interfaces
  • Radio access network
  • Core network
  • Network configuration problem or technology
    limitation?
  • Use of extreMe cellUlar System Architeture (MUSA)
  • High number of RTOs due to the UMTS uplink
  • RLC retransmissions do not succeed in hiding
    channel losses to TCP
  • Scarce utilization of uplink radio resource by
    TCP
  • Behavior of other implementations of TCP
  • Cubic
  • Westwood

36
Download in MUSA
37
Upload in MUSA
38
Thanks for your kind attention!
  • Questions?

Gennaro Boggia, Antonio Barbuzzi Assistant
Professor, PhD Student Telematics Lab Politecnico
di Bari boggia_at_poliba.it a.barbuzzi_at_poliba.it
Paolo Dini Research Associate IP
Technologies CTTC paolo.dini_at_cttc.es
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com