The Role of Family in Healthy Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Family in Healthy Development

Description:

Garbarino (1992) has characterised the family as 'the basic unit of human experience. ... being warm and compassionate is more important (Lamb & Tamis-Lemonda, 2004) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: louise71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Family in Healthy Development


1
The Role of Family in Healthy Development
  • Lecturer Dr Louise Ellis
  • Course HSBH 1005
  • Date 27th August 08

2
Overview
  • We will be looking at
  • The family as a system
  • Parenting styles
  • The infant and families
  • Critical thinking exercise
  • Video - the changing family

3
The Family as a System
  • Garbarino (1992) has characterised the family as
    the basic unit of human experience.
  • The family is a whole consisting of interrelated
    parts, each of which affects and is affected by
    every other part, and each of which contributes
    to the functioning of the whole.
  • Up until the 1970s family studies focused only
    on mother-child relationships. We now know things
    are more complex even within the nuclear
    family.
  • The term nuclear family refers to a household
    consisting of a husband/father, a wife/mother and
    at least one child. Still the norm?
  • Every individual within the family affects every
    other individual through reciprocal influence.

4
A System within other Systems
  • Whether a family is nuclear in structure or not,
    it does not exist in a vacuum.
  • Families are a system embedded in larger social
    systems
  • Neighbourhoods
  • Communities
  • Subcultures (e.g., religious group)
  • Broader cultures (e.g., ethnic origin)
  • Family experiences across different cultures can
    differ greatly (e.g. husband takes many wives).
  • There is almost infinite ways a family is
    comprised and how they influence each other over
    the lifespan.

5
A system within other systems
Bronfenbrenners Ecological Approach to
Development
6
The Family as a Changing System
  • Family membership changes as new children are
    born and as grown children leave the home.
  • The individuals within the family are all
    developing individuals.
  • Changes in family membership or changes in any
    individual or relationship within the family
    affect the dynamics of the whole.
  • It is very hard to predict a typical family
    system and to understand dynamics in that
    system.
  • The most commonly referred to system of typical
    family is that of the family life cycle A
    sequence of changes in family composition from
    birth to death.

7
Stages of the Family Life Cycle
  • Duvall (1977) outlined 8 stages of the family
    life cycle
  • Married without children
  • Child bearing family (oldest child no more than
    30months)
  • Family with pre-school children (oldest child no
    more than 6 years)
  • Family with school age children (oldest no more
    than 12 years)
  • Family with teenagers (oldest child no more than
    20 years)
  • Family launching young adults (until last child
    leaves)
  • Family without children (Empty next till
    retirement)
  • Aging family (Retirement till death)
  • Each stage is characterised by a set of
    developmental tasks the family must master to
    remain healthy.
  • Research indicates that most Australians are no
    longer travelling through these traditional
    stages.

8
A Changing System in a Changing World
  • To complicate things even further, the family
    exists and develops in a changing world.
  • During the last half of the 20th century, several
    dramatic social changes have altered the makeup
    of the typical family.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007) statistics
    that
  • Almost 1 in 3 people will never marry
  • 1 in 3 marriages end in divorce
  • 1 in five children are in one parent families

9
Trends Affecting Western Families
  • More single adults
  • Postponed Marriage
  • Fewer Children 2 in 2006, 3.1 in 1976.
  • More women are working 70 in 2006, 55 in 1976.
  • More Divorce 33 in 2007, 10 in mid-1960s
  • More single parent families 20 in 2006
  • More children living in poverty
  • More remarriages and redefined families
  • More years without children
  • More intergenerational families
  • Fewer carers for aging adults

10
Parenting Styles
  • 2 key elements
  • Parental demandingness (level of supervision
    discipline)
  • Parental responsiveness (level of warmth
    support)

11
Parenting Styles
  • Authoritarian Directive Parenting
  • Strict control, minimal child input, high
    monitoring behaviour
  • High demandingness / low responsiveness
  • Sound academic achievement and uninvolved in
    problem behaviour, but poor social skills, low
    self-esteem, and increased depression
  • Authoritative Parenting
  • Parent sets and enforce rules but children given
    autonomy
  • High demandingness / high responsiveness
  • Sound academic achievement, high social
    competence, high self esteem and uninvolved in
    problem behaviour
  • (Maccoby Martin, 1983)

12
Parenting Styles
  • Indulgent parenting (also referred to as
    permissive or non-directive)
  • Parents are open to child input, they have few
    demands and moderate to low levels of monitoring
  • High responsiveness / low demandingness
  • Involved in problem behavior and poor academic
    competence, but have high self-esteem, good
    social skills, and low levels of depression
  • Uninvolved parenting
  • Laissez-faire approach with little involvement in
    or of monitoring of child life
  • Low responsiveness / low demandingness
  • Involved in problem behavior and poor academic
    competence, poor social skills, low self-esteem,
    and increased depression
  • (Maccoby Martin, 1983)

13
The Infant and Families
  • Importance of mothers due to their caregiver
    role.
  • Evidence suggests that fathers and mothers are
    more similar than different in the ways they
    interact with infants and young children. (Eg
    Fathers sense feeding cues in babies just as well
    as mothers).
  • Each parent is equally capable of raising a
    child, but quantity and quality of time doing
    this can be different (Marsigilo et al, 2000)
  • Quantity Mothers spend more time than fathers
    with children (Bjorklund Pellegrini, 2002)
  • Quality Fathers spend more quality time in some
    instances (Pleck Masciadrelli, 2004)
  • Mother are spending at least as much time with
    their children as they did 40 years ago. Fathers
    are now spending more time with their children
    (Bianchi, Robinson Mikie, 2006).
  • Nonetheless, fathers still spend less time with
    their children than mothers.

14
Styles of Child Interaction
  • Mothers and fathers differ in their typical
    styles of interacting with young children.
  • Fathers like to bounce, tickle and surprise
    infants.
  • Mothers like to hold, talk to and play quietly
    with infants.
  • However, fathers are noted to adopt mothers style
    of play when they are the sole caregiver.
  • Perhaps fathers automatically see themselves as
    the back up parent (Phares, 1999).

15
Infant Development with Fathers
  • A fathers primary role in infant support is
    traditionally a financial one (Marsiglio et al,
    2000)
  • However, by psychological standards, being warm
    and compassionate is more important (Lamb
    Tamis-Lemonda, 2004)
  • When both parents are highly involved with the
    infant, social competence grows quickly as the
    child develops (Main Weston, 1981)
  • Affectionate fathering is correlated with
    academic achievement in early schooling (Cabrera
    et al, 2000)
  • Fathers like to egg their children into
    explorative behaviour during play. This is highly
    correlated with breeding secure attachment styles
    in later life relationships (Grossmann et al,
    2002)

16
Mothers, Fathers and InfantsThe System at Work
  • To understand the basis of family, it should be
    viewed as a 3 person system at the very least
    (mother-father-child).
  • No longer do we consider the mother-child
    relationship the core of the family.
  • Every member of the family has indirect effects
    on the other members.
  • Indirect effect means that 2 persons in the
    families relationship is modified in behaviour
    when a 3rd person is present.
  • Eg. Mother and Fathers who communicate well with
    each other tend to raise their child in an
    equitable and caring way.
  • An imbalance in communication between the
    mother-father relationship can lead to
    over-bearing parenting behaviour with the child.
  • Overall, parents can co-team well if
    communication between them is of a high level. If
    not, they can undermine each others attempts at
    good parenting (Parke, 2000)

17
Critical Thinking Exercise
  • Are fathers essentially for children to
    experience normal, healthy development?
  • Fatherlessness is the most harmful demographic
    trend of this generation. It is the leading cause
    of declining child well-being in our societyto
    tolerate the trend of fatherlessness is to accept
    the inevitability of continued societal
    recession Blankenhorn (1995).
  • Evidence
  • Over the past 40 years, the proportion of
    children growing up without a father in the home
    has more than doubled.
  • During that time we have seen dramatic increases
    in juvenile delinquency, violent crime, drug
    abuse, eating disorders, suicide and family
    dysfunction.
  • Studies have demonstrated the association between
    father absence and these factors.
  • Implications
  • heterosexual marriage is the only appropriate
    context in which to raise children?
  • Inappropriate for single women or lesbian couples
    to have children?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com