Group Influence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Group Influence

Description:

Loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension. Factors ... Social Determinism. Fiedler's Contingency Theory: person vs. task oriented leaders. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Raymon
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Group Influence


1
Group Influence
  • What is a group?
  • How does being in a group change us?

2
What is a group?
  • Numerous definitions of the term.
  • A number of individuals who are interacting with
    each other.
  • Several individuals who are interdependent in
    some way.
  • A number of individuals who join together to
    achieve a goal.
  • A social unit consisting of two or more people
    who perceive themselves as belonging to a group.
  • A collection of individuals whose interactions
    are structured by a set of roles and norms.

3
Different Forums of Group Influence
  • Collective influence in minimal group situations
  • Social facilitation
  • Social Loafing
  • Deindividuation
  • Group influence in interacting groups
  • Group polarization
  • Groupthink
  • Minority Influence

4
Social Facilitation
  • The strengthening of dominant responses in the
    presence of others.
  • Why?
  • Evaluation Apprehension enhancement is strongest
    when people think they are being evaluated.
  • Mere presence occurs in other species, may be a
    built-in biological mechanism.

5
Social Loafing
  • Tendency to reduce effort when pooling effort
    toward a common goal and when they are not
    individually accountable.
  • Tug of war, clapping studies.
  • In essence, social loafing appears to occur due
    to a reduction in evaluation apprehension.
  • Increases when not individually evaluated or
    rewarded.
  • Decreases when tasks are challenging or
    appealing, and when fellow group members are
    friends (as opposed to strangers).

6
Deindividuation
  • Loss of self-awareness and evaluation
    apprehension.
  • Factors
  • Physical anonymity (Zimbardo study with masked
    women delivering shocks, drivers in convertibles
    are less likely to honk, anthropological research
    that suggests that cultures with depersonalized
    warriors also were the cultures more likely to
    brutalize enemies).

7
Deindividuation
  • However, deindividuation does not automatically
    lead to negative behavior.
  • Makes one more responsive to cues in the
    environment, thus altruistic cues lead a
    deindividuated person to be kinder.
  • Why?
  • Diminished self-awareness those made self-aware
    exhibit more self-control and their actions are
    more consistent with their attitudes.

8
Group Polarization
  • Originally dubbed the risky shift
  • The risky shift involved the tendency for group
    decisions to be riskier than the average decision
    of the individuals in the group.
  • However, subsequent research showed that groups
    may get more cautious
  • Group polarization is the tendency for group
    decisions to be more extreme than that of
    individuals. Amplifies pre-existing tendencies.
  • Same logic as social facilitation.

9
Group Polarization
  • Why?
  • Group discussion leads you to hear more
    information.
  • Active participation in a discussion leads you to
    rehearse your thoughts leading to more attitude
    change.
  • Safer to provide more extreme answers once the
    normative opinion of the group has been
    determined.

10
Minority Influence and Leadership
  • What makes someone a good leader?
  • Theories
  • Trait Theory/Great Leader Charisma,
    intelligence?
  • Social Determinism.
  • Fiedlers Contingency Theory person vs. task
    oriented leaders.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com