Hints for Building Self Systems Vijay K. Garg The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712 ema - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Hints for Building Self Systems Vijay K. Garg The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712 ema

Description:

Self-awareness: is the state consistent with goals? Monitoring for system properties ... Determinism considered dangerous. Nondeterminism allows the system to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: selma7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hints for Building Self Systems Vijay K. Garg The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712 ema


1
Hints for Building Self- SystemsVijay K.
GargThe University of Texas at AustinAustin, TX
78712email garg_at_ece.utexas.edu
2
Talk Outline
  • Overview
  • Hints for Self- Systems
  • Specify Know your goals
  • Observe Know your state
  • Keep choices Know multiple ways
  • Plan Know your strategy
  • Control reconfigure, reset, reorganize, adapt
  • Paradise

3
Goal
  • Identify research tasks for self- systems
  • Identify current (mis)practices
  • Publicize research at PDSLAB, UT Austin

4
Specify Know your goals
  • Biological Systems goals at multiple levels
  • Survival, happiness, money, job
  • Computer Systems are not aware of their goals
  • At best, we have specs of the programs
  • Need
  • Specs at multiple levels
  • Using Specs for Runtime Verification
  • Adapting to the environment

5
Observe Know your state
  • Self-awareness is the state consistent with
    goals?
  • Monitoring for system properties
  • Stable Properties e.g. Chandy,Lamport 85
  • Unstable Properties
  • Single State based e.g. Linear Predicates Chase,
    Garg 95, Relational Predicates Tomlinson, Garg
    96
  • Temporal Logic based e.g. Regular CTL Sen, Garg
    04
  • Need
  • Integration with runtime environments

6
Choices Know multiple ways
  • Determinism considered dangerous
  • Nondeterminism allows the system to deal with
  • Faults
  • Uncertainty
  • Changing environment
  • Need
  • Nondeterministic choice in general prog.
    Languages (e.g. Dijkstras Guarded Command
    Language)
  • Support for selective communication (e.g. CSP)
  • Support for family of modules

7
Plan Know your strategy
  • Know your state space
  • Exploit what computers are good at
  • View program as two parts
  • Finite state part computer analyzable
  • Infinite part trust humans
  • Lookahead Execution
  • Computation slicing Garg, Mittal 2001
  • Need
  • Support for systems with lookahead
  • Support for on-the-fly model checking

8
Control Controlled Execution
  • Use nondeterminism to your advantage
  • Try different order of message processing
  • Impose additional synchronization Tarafdar, Garg
    04
  • Supervisory Control of Discrete Event Systems
    Ramadge and Wonham 89, Kumar and Garg 95
  • Tunable parameters (adaptive control)
  • Need
  • execution environments with control
  • Programming languages that support feedback

9
Paradise Project
  • Key Abstraction Global Properties
  • Model Checking and Verification Check global
    properties against model of the program (Promela)
  • Simulation and Debugging Global breakpoints,
    Trace analysis
  • Fault-Tolerance Monitoring for global
    properties, Controlled Re-execution

10
Paradise Environment
Control
11
Paradise Tools
  • Trace Cover SPIN (Model Checker) alleviating
    state explosion
  • Visual Dashboard
  • Partial Order Trace Analysis (POTA) slicing
  • Paradise Library tracking dependency, global
    snapshot, global properties
  • Paradise Execution Engine control

12
Conclusions
  • Current execution engines are too primitive to
    build self- systems
  • Need more knowledge
  • Goals, multiple choices, current state
  • Research at PDSLAB
  • www.ece.utexas.edu/garg/pubs.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com