Title: Medical Imaging Research and Regulatory Concerns at the FDA
1Medical Imaging Research and Regulatory Concerns
at the FDA
- David G. Brown, Ph.D.
- 11 November 2008
- david.brown_at_fda.hhs.gov
2MI at FDA Overview
- FDA
- What, where, who, why, how
- (Is medical imaging a food or a drug?)
- Medical Imaging
- From safety to effectiveness
- Clinical trials and computer assists
- A sample of current projects
3Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics
OSEL, CDRH, FDA
4Center for Devices and Radiological Health
5Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories
6Engineering and Physics Building FDA White Oak MD
Campus
7Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics
- Performance assessment for diagnostic medical
imaging and related systems
8(No Transcript)
9FDA Mission
- The FDA is responsible for protecting the public
health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and
security of human and veterinary drugs,
biological products, medical devices, our
nations food supply, cosmetics, and products
that emit radiation. The FDA is also responsible
for advancing the public health by helping to
speed innovations that make medicines and foods
more effective, safer, and more affordable and
helping the public get the accurate,
science-based information they need to use
medicines and foods to improve their health.
10How Big is FDA?
- The FDA regulates more than 1 trillion worth of
consumer goods, about 25 percent of consumer
expenditures in the United States. This includes
466 billion in food sales, 275 billion in
drugs, 60 billion in cosmetics and 18 billion
in vitamin supplements. Much of the expenditure
is for goods imported into the United States the
FDA is responsible for monitoring a third of all
imports. (Wikipedia) - 3 billion budget
- 15,000 staff
11What FDA Regulates
- FDA is the federal agency responsible for
ensuring that foods are safe, wholesome and
sanitary human and veterinary drugs, biological
products, and medical devices are safe and
effective cosmetics are safe and electronic
products that emit radiation are safe. FDA also
ensures that these products are honestly,
accurately and informatively represented to the
public.
12What FDA Does Not Regulate
- Advertising (FTC)except prescription drugs and
medical devices - Alcohol (BATF)
- Consumer Products (CPSC)except medical and
radiation emitting - Drugs of Abuse (DEA)
- Health Insurance (CMS)
- Meat and Poultry (USDA)
- Pesticides (USDA/EPA)
- Restaurants and Grocery Stores (local)
- Water (EPA)except bottled water
13Miscellaneous FDA Activities
- MedWatch -- FDA provides safety information on
drugs and other FDA-regulated products, and
allows for adverse event reporting. - Recalls -- FDA posts significant product actions
of the last 60 days. - Inspections - FDA inspects processing plants and
other agency-regulated facilities. - Advisory Committees - FDA convenes public
meetings with outside experts for advice on
making key public health decisions.
14CDRH Regulation
- Medical Devices
- By risk classification
- Clearance vs. approval
- Safety and effectiveness
- Least burdensome
- Radiation Products
- Consumer as well as medical
15What is a medical device?
- "an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine,
contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other
similar or related article, including a component
part, or accessory which is - recognized in the official National Formulary, or
the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any
supplement to them, - intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or
other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation,
treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or
other animals, or - intended to affect the structure or any function
of the body of man or other animals, and which
does not achieve any of it's primary intended
purposes through chemical action within or on the
body of man or other animals and which is not
dependent upon being metabolized for the
achievement of any of its primary intended
purposes."
16Classification of Medical Devices
- Class I (low risk)e.g., stethoscopes
- Class II (moderate risk)e.g., most imaging
devices such as CT, MRI and US scanners - Class III (high risk)e.g., pacemakers. Other
devices may be Class III because - Used in conjunction with Class III devices
- Has a large potential effect on the public health
- Scientific principles of the device are not
well-known
17510(k)
- Most Class II devices are cleared for marketing
via a 510(k) (named after the section of the
statutory law) in which the sponsor demonstrates
SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE to another legally U.S.
marketed device (referred to as a predicate
device).
18510(k)
- A device is substantially equivalent if, compared
to a predicate it - has the SAME INTENDED USE as the predicate AND
- has the SAME TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS as the
predicate -
- OR
19510(k)
- has the SAME INTENDED USE as the predicate
device AND -
20510(k)
- Has different technological characteristics
(e.g., change in material, design, energy source,
software) AND the information submitted to FDA - Does not raise different (i.e., new) types of
questions of safety and effectiveness AND - Demonstrates that the device is as safe and
effective as the predicate device. -
21Pre-Market Approval Application (PMA)
- Most Class III devices are approved for marketing
via a PMA - Unlike a 510(k), a PMA is not typically a
comparison to other legally marketed devices but
must stand on its own to demonstrate the safety
and effectiveness of the device for its intended
use.
22Safety
- There is reasonable assurance that a device is
safe when it can be determined, based upon valid
scientific evidence, that the probable benefits
to health from use of the device for its intended
uses and conditions of use, when accompanied by
adequate directions and warnings against unsafe
use, outweigh any probable risks
23Safety
- The valid scientific evidence used to determine
the safety of a device must adequately
demonstrate the absence of unreasonable risk of
illness or injury associated with the use of the
device for its intended uses and conditions of
use
24Safety
- Among the types of evidence that may be required,
when appropriate, to determine that there is
reasonable assurance that a device is safe are
investigations using laboratory animals,
investigations involving human subjects, and
non-clinical investigations including in vitro
studies
25Effectiveness
- There is reasonable assurance that a device is
effective when it can be determined, based upon
valid scientific evidence, that in a significant
portion of the target population, the use of the
device for its intended uses and conditions of
use, when accompanied by adequate directions for
use and warnings against unsafe use, will provide
clinically significant results
26Effectiveness
- The valid scientific evidence used to determine
the effectiveness of a device shall consist
principally of well-controlled investigations, as
statutorily defined, unless the Commissioner
authorizes reliance upon other valid scientific
evidence which the Commissioner has determined is
sufficient evidence from which to determine the
effectiveness of a device, even in the absence of
well-controlled investigations.
27Least Burdensome
- A central purpose of the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA)
is to ensure the timely availability of safe and
effective new products that will benefit the
public
28Imaging Research in DIAM
- Emphasis on performance evaluation
- Study complete imaging chain from radiation
production to image display and human observation - Development of task-based methodology
- Reliance on physics, statistics, simulation
29The typical image processing paper has six pages
of math and three pictures 1. Original image
302. Noisy image
313. Processed image
32Task Selection
- Meaningful imaging performance assessment is task
dependent
33Physician Selection
- Not all Drs. were created equal
34Use CAD Tools
- Reduce physician variability
- Increase accuracy
35How good is your CAD?
- Medipatterns B-CAD(R) increases diagnostic
accuracy on small breast cancer lesions by 44 - New applications will enable radiologists to
analyze and track lymph nodes of interest in an
accurate and consistent manner. - Az values for radiologist alone .85, with CADx
.89, with CALMA .91. Area under the ROC curve
for unaided mammography reading and reading using
two different CAD systems - Az with CAD .96 and for junior radiologists .94
36The dimension problem
- Many, many featuresToo few patients
- Genomic microarray data 10,000 or more
gene-expression values per measurement - Tens of patients, poor quality data, poor quality
ground truth
37DIAM projects
- Improved X-ray Imaging for Women
- Coronary applications
- How to improve imaging protocols and image-guided
interventions for women? - Breast applications emphasis on tomosynthesis
- What are the optimal imaging techniques,
reconstruction algorithms, and display methods?
Cardiovascular disease mortality trends for
males and females (US 1979-2002).
Tomosynthesis system
detector
x
-
scanning ray tube
q
planes of reconstruction
38DIAM projects
- Improved Disease Quantitation via 3D Imaging
- Lung CT applications
- How can CAD algorithms be efficiently validated
for changes in CT scanners, different imaging
techniques, and CAD algorithm enhancements? - What imaging-based measures are appropriate
indicators of drug response?
Accelerate bench-to-bedside availability of new
technologies!
39DIAM products
- Training for outstanding post-docs
- Training a new cadre of researchers who have been
exposed to the regulatory environment and
understand the safety and effectiveness questions
that regulators must ask - Lab tomosynthesis/
- cone-beam CT system for support of multiple
projects - Scientific presentations
- Journal publications
- Posters
- Regulatory support
40A system for computer based Coronary Artery
Disease imaging clinical trials
41Heart muscle supplies blood to tissues,
organs. Coronary artery disease affects the blood
supply to the heart.
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is diagnosed with
coronary angiogram
Plaque is formed from fatty deposits in the
coronary arteries
Catheter transported to the coronaries through
the femoral artery
Over time arteries are clogged and hardened
(atherosclerosis)?
Arteries show up on screen as dark trees.
Stenosis shows up as narrowing
42Coronary angiogram
43Treatment example
A catheter is transported through the femoral
artery to the stenosis location
A stent is transported to the lesion site and
balloon expands
Catheter is removed, arterial pathway is free.
44Public health concernCardiovascular disease
largest, most expensive killer disease
- Coronary artery disease
- 38 of all deaths
- 400B cost
- Many open questions
- Gender differences
- Anatomical, physiological, socioeconomic
- Differences affect diagnosis treatment, and
outcomes - Currently women are not served by angiography
Data American Heart Association 2005
45Clinical study development
- Determine gender differences that affect imaging
- Build male and female virtual patients with
differences incorporated - Build a virtual imaging system/cath-lab
- Develop a virtual physician to detect disease
- Use models to determine best imaging protocol to
image each gender (each patient?)?
46Gender differencesGenerally women
- More unusual symptoms of a heart attack
- Longer to get to the hospital
- Less likely to be admitted to the intensive
cardiac care, get electrocardiograms,
clot-busting drugs, or cardiac catheterization - More likely to die from a heart attack or get
second - Older, sicker (more diabetes, high blood
pressure, other) - More likely to die in the hospital during bypass
or angioplasty - Less likely to have better quality of life after
bypass surgery - Less likely to be directed to a cardiac
rehabilitation program, or finish one - Less likely to get counseling about nutrition,
exercise, weight loss to prevent heart disease
47Gender differencesSpecific to imaging
Differences in plaque deposition, size and
morphology.
Hemodynamic differences (different blood
viscosity).
Coronary calcium detection lower scores in
women (smaller arteries, smaller plaque)?
Coronary angiography less likely to succeed
women are older, frequent failure to cross
lesion, smaller vessel caliber
Higher prevalence of contrast-induced nephropathy
in women
48Why clinical trials in-silico?
- Can help develop and evaluate 21st century
devices with 21st century methodologies - Can simulate a multitude of imaging systems
- Infinite number of patients
- Target and minimize real clinical trials
- Reduce trial costs
- Allow for more specific, stronger claims and
labeling - Faster times from concept to clinic
- Improved clinical diagnostic and therapeutic
outcomes - Patients benefit
- Increase profit margin
49Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
50Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
51Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
52Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
53Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
Incorporating a realistic coronary artery disease
model
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
Gensini severity scores
54Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
Incorporating a realistic coronary artery disease
model
Prevalence of significant stenoses (gt50) by
location and age
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
Kyriakides et. al. J Clin Epidemiol Vol.48
55Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
56Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- LAMIS Virtual Cath. Lab.
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology Physiology
57Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- LAMIS Virtual Cath Lab
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
58Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- LAMIS Virtual Cath Lab
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
59Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- LAMIS Virtual Cath Lab
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
60Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
Patient Information (Blood work, imaging)?
- LAMIS Virtual Cath Lab
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
Virtual Cath Lab
Select optimized parameters in real time
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
61Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
Patient Information (Blood work, imaging)?
- LAMIS Virtual Cath Lab
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
Virtual Cath Lab
Select optimized parameters in real time
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
62Clinical trial in-silico
- Input
- Full body CT
- High res. CT angio
- Probabilistic pathology model
- LAMIS Virtual Cath Lab
- X-ray physics (Monte Carlo)?
- Virtual patient
- Virtual radiologist
- Output 4th generation Phantom
- Accurate anatomy
- Realistic coronary pathology
- Physiology
Virtual coronary angiogram
63Conclusions
- Identified public health concern
- Identified gender differences that affect CAD
imaging - Built and validated virtual cath-lab
- Biological model In-silico patients
- High resolution heart models
- Statistical biological function model of heart
- Method for plaque placement
- Virtual patient
- Generated realistic virtual angiograms
- Project at final stage
- generate data and develop imaging protocol
64Quantitative assessment of tumor drug response
with thoracic CT imaging
- Project team at Division of Imaging and Applied
Mathematics, OSEL/CDRH/FDA - Marios A Gavrielides
- Lisa M Kinnard
- Rongping Zeng
- Kyle J Myers
- Nicholas Petrick
- Support by FDA, NIBIB, NCI
65Quantitative assessment of drug response with
thoracic CT imaging
66Quantitative assessment of drug response with
thoracic CT imaging
- Biomedical imaging can provide an early
indication of drug response, but - many sources of uncertainty that limit the
quantitative use of imaging as a biomarker - variables in the image data collection platform
- robustness of software tools required for
reliable, quantitative measurement of subtle
changes
67Quantitative assessment of drug response with
thoracic CT imaging
- Quantitative imaging research
- Shift from binary tasks (malignant vs benign) to
estimation tasks (i.e. decrease in tumor size by
25 in 3 months) - Measurement science of estimation tasks not
mature - Further research is needed
68Quantitative assessment of drug response with
thoracic CT imaging
- Estimation task
- Drug response of lung nodules
- Surrogate endpoint
- Size change estimation using thoracic CT imaging
69Background
- Lung nodule change analysis w/thoracic CT to
- verify diagnosis, especially for small nodules
- estimate response to drug therapy
- Metrics used to describe lung nodule size
- 1-D analysis (max dimension) using RECIST
criteria - (replaced older 2-D analysis using WHO criteria)
- 3-D volumetric analysis
70Background- RECIST criteria
Diameter17.7 mm
Diameter17.1 mm
Vol525.4 mm3
MSKCC DATA
Courtesy of Larry Clarke, NCI
71Background- nodule size metrics
- RECIST criteria
- based on assumption of spherical nodules
- but majority of nodules grow irregularly
- Volumetric 3D analysis may be more accurate
72Background- nodule size metrics
- New generation CT scanners
- Fast gantry rotation
- Acquire full scan in single breath hold at lt1mm
- Near-isotropic data
- Improved volumetric analysis
73Diameter17.7 mm
Vol525.4 mm3
Diameter17.1 mm
MSKCC DATA
Courtesy of Larry Clarke, NCI
74Volumetric analysis of lung nodules
- Potential for quantitative volumetric analysis of
CT imaging to impact - accurate assessment of change
- patient management
- reduce time needed to assess change
- Key issues
- accuracy/reliability of volumetric measurements
- is a 20 decrease in lung nodule volume after a
week of drug therapy due to actual nodule
response or measurement error?
75Volumetric analysis of lung nodules
- Factors influencing volumetric measurement
accuracy - Image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
- Slice thickness, slice collimation, tube current,
pitch, reconstruction algorithm/kernel - Inherent variability of scanner
- Nodule characteristics
- Size, shape, density, location, vascular/pleura
attachments - Volume measurement method
- Manually-drawn boundaries, different segmentation
algorithms - Which parameters contribute the most to
measurement error?
M A Gavrielides, L M Kinnard, et. al, Volumetric
methods for the assessment of lung nodules with
thoracic CT, Radiology, (in press)
76Image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
- Effect of slice thickness on measurement error
- For 38-mm diameter (synthetic)
- 11.2 (slice thickness 2 mm) to 16.4 (10 mm)
- For 13-mm diameter
- 13.0 (slice thickness 2 mm) to 28.0 (10 mm)
- Spherical, homogeneous synthetic nodules, no
attachments
Winer-Muram, H.T., et. al Effect of varying CT
section width on volumetric measurement of lung
tumors and application of compensatory
equations. Radiology, 2003. 229(1) p. 184-194.
77Nodule characteristics
- Decreasing size increases error
- Measurement error ranging from
- 1.0 for nodule volume of 268 cm3
- 28.6 for 3.5 cm3.
- Error also up for irregular shapes
Ko, J.P., H. Rusinek,et. al, Small pulmonary
nodules Volume measurement at chest CT- Phantom
study. Radiology, 2003. 228(3) p. 864-870.
78Volume measurement method
Courtesy of Larry Clarke, NCI
Meyer, C.R.,.et. al, Evaluation of lung MDCT
nodule annotation across radiologists and
methods. Academic Radiology, 2006. 13(10) p.
1254-1265.
79Volume measurement method
- Based on manually drawn boundaries
- large inter-observer variability exits
- Based on software tools
- reduced variance but bias present
- (bias not predictable across lesions, scans,
etc.) - Both bias and variance error analysis should be
performed before choosing software method
Meyer, C.R.,.et. al, Evaluation of lung MDCT
nodule annotation across radiologists and
methods. Academic Radiology, 2006. 13(10) p.
1254-1265.
80Experimental approaches to examine volumetric
estimation accuracy
- Phantom studies w/ synthetic nodules
- known volume truth
- can investigate range of variables such as tube
current, w/out concern for patient exposure - provide lower bound on volume estimation error
(bias and variance) - Simulation studies
- generation of images with realistic properties by
tracking the transport of particles from the
source to the object of interest. - Analysis of clinical nodules
- the lunch break experiment on repeat scans
- provides estimates of measurement variance
Badano, A. and J. Sempau, MANTIS combined x-ray,
electron and optical Monte Carlo simulations of
indirect radiation imaging systems. Physics in
Med. and Biol
81Project Objective
- Identify and quantify sources of nodule size
estimation error - 3D (volume), 1D (RECIST), and 2D (WHO)
measurements - Realistic phantom studies with systematic
approach - Knowledge of dependence of bias/variance to
specific parameters will - assist in development of standards for imaging
protocols/software tools - impact the adoption of quantitative imaging
approaches in the design, development and
evaluation of drugs
82Project Plan
- Thoracic CT phantom studies
- Realistic phantom
- Multislice helical CT scanner
- Synthetic lung nodules of varying size, shape,
density, location - Different truthing approaches
- Extract estimates of nodule size
- Analyze bias/variance of estimation error
83Lung CT phantom studies
- Anthropomorphic phantom from Kyotokagaku, Japan
- lung vasculature
- synthetic nodules
- allows for studies on realistic scenario of
nodule attachments
84Lung CT phantom studies
- CT scanner
- Philips 16-slice Mx8000
- FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM)
- Collaboration with Drs. Pritchard and Karanian
(Dr. Wood/NIH)
85Lung CT phantom studies
- Nodule sets
- Spherical nodules (Kyotokagaku)
- 0.3-1.2 cm
- -800, -630, 100 HU
- Larger spherical set from CIRS
- 2.0, 4.0, 6.0cm
- -800, -630, 100 HU
86Lung CT phantom studies
- Nodule sets
- Aspheric nodules (CIRS)
- Elliptical shapes
- Spiculated nodules
- Lobulated nodules
87Lung CT phantom studies
- Volume truthing approaches
- Water displacement method
- Micro-CT imaging
- Collaboration with NIST (S. Lin-Gibson, C.
Fenimore), U of Iowa (G. McClennan), NIH - Collaboration with Wash U.
- Cartesian coordinate machine
- Collaboration with NIST (S. Philips, C. Fenimore)
- Robotic probe taking surface samples, surface fit
surface rendering of micro_CT scan
88Lung CT phantom studies
- Volume measurement methods
- Use available 3D software tools
- publicly available OSIRIX
- commercial 3D Doctor
- research tools from collaborators level-set
segmentation (NIH) - All are 3D-segmentation based
- Difficult to assess effect of variables due to
large segmentation errors
1L.M. Kinnard,et al Volume Error Analysis for
Lung Nodules Attached to Bronchial Vessels in an
Anthropomorphic Thoracic Phantom, SPIE Medical
Imaging 2008, vol. 6915, 69152Q, 2008.
89Lung CT phantom studies
- Volume measurement methods
- Develop 3D matched filter
- Use simulation to derive models of system effect
along object_to_image transformation - Apply models to correct for acquisition/reconstruc
tion parameters before measurement
90Image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
variable tube current
20mAs Volume660mm3
200mAs Volume830mm3
10mm nodule Volume524mm3
91Image acquisition and reconstruction variance on
repeat scans
92Lung CT phantom studies
- Matching of scanned nodule volumes to banks of
simulated 3D nodule templates to estimate volume
93Nodule layouts
- Preliminary scans to determine materials to
secure nodules - surgical suture prolene 5.0
94Phantom Study Deliverables 1
- Public Image Database
- Phantom thoracic scans
- Across range of imaging protocols, nodules sizes,
shapes, attachments - Associated truth of nodule volume
- Available to software developers and researchers
- Allow for determination of bias and variance
- Understanding/quantifying sources of error
- Related to size measures (volume, RECIST, WHO)
- Relative contribution to the error of different
sources (imaging parameters, nodule
characteristics, software tools)
95Phantom Study Deliverables 2
- FDA Recommendations for guidance
- For techniques used to design clinical trials
utilizing imaging as a biomarker - For computer-aided analysis tools used in
quantitative assessment of medical images (used
by reviewers of submissions to CDRH/CDER) - For phantoms and image acquisition protocols
96Summary
- Potential for improved volumetric measurements
tools - Increased/improved use of quantitative imaging in
drug trials and monitoring - Recommendations to software developers and drug
companies on which variables should be controlled
97Summary
- Improving the precision and accuracy of drug
response analysis - could significantly reduce the size and cost of
clinical trials for drug response - could assist in increase the use of quantitative
imaging in the drug development process - Quantitative imaging would provide a step towards
personalized medicine
98Computer-aided assessment of HER2/neu
immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer
An observer study
99Study objective
- The objective of this study is to assess the
benefit of a computer-aid in reducing inter- and
intra-observer variability in the evaluation of
the biomarker HER2/neu for breast cancer -
100Background
- About 25 of breast cancer patients over-express
the protein HER2/neu - These patients respond well to adjuvant treatment
with the drug herceptin which was shown to reduce
risk of recurrence by 1/2 and mortality by 1/3
(Wolff, 2007) - However
- Need to consider side effects (including heart
dysfunction) and cost (50K-100K/year) - Need accurate and reproducible assessment of HER2
expression to find good responders and guide
treatment
101Background
- Guidelines for HER2 management
- Examine HER2-stained tissue with
immunohistochemistry (IHC) - Categorize each case as 1, 2, or 3 (3 highest
expression) - Follow-up
- 3 positive gt herceptin treatment
- 2 ambiguous gt further testing (FISH imaging)
- 1 negative gt no herceptin treatment
102HER-2/neu scoring using IHC
- Evaluation based on color stain assessment of
the cell membrane - membrane staining completeness
- is staining around the whole circumference?
- membrane staining intensity
- ranging from faint to strong brown
103Guidelines for HER-2/neu scoring
- From College of American Pathologists
- Similar guidelines from staining kit
manufacturers
based on whole slide
104Examples of regions of interest extracted from
slides scored as 3 (positive)
Strong staining around the whole membrane for a
significant number of cells
Note evaluation is performed only on epithelial
cells not this area of connective tissue
105Examples of regions of interest extracted from
slides scored as 3 (positive)
more positive ..? Membrane staining is more
intense and more complete than previous slide
106Examples of regions of interest extracted from
slides scored as 1
Faint staining in a few cells
107Issues related to HER2 evaluation
- Studies have shown significant inter- and
intra-observer variability in HER2 interpretation - 48 correct agreement , 5 observers (Hsu, Am J
Clin Pathol, 2002) - Sources of variability include
- subjective criteria for color staining assessment
- different ways observers combine scores from
different fields of view - differences in pathologist experience, training
- Computer-aided assessment has the potential to
decrease observer variability in the evaluation
of IHC
108Computer-aided assessment of HER2
- We have developed a computer system for the
automated quantitative assessment of HER21 - Provides quantitative measures of both
- membrane staining completeness and
- membrane staining intensity
- which are the main features used in HER2
assessment - Preliminary results1 showed good agreement with
pathologist-provided HER2 scores
1H Masmoudi, S Hewitt, K J Myers, N Petrick, and
M A Gavrielides, Automated quantitative
assessment of HER-2/neu immunohistochemical
expression in breast cancer, IEEE Trans Med Imag
(accepted).
109Observer study
- Main hypotheses to be tested
- computer-aided assessment of IHC can decrease
intra- and/or inter-observer variability in the
assessment of HER2 for breast cancer - computer-aided assessment of IHC can be used as a
training tool to increase agreement between
novices and trained pathologists in the
evaluation of HER2 microscopy images from breast
cancer tissue specimens
110Computer-output for observer study
- Prompt displays the computer-extracted membrane
staining intensity and completeness values for
the current ROI relative to values of training
ROIs - Location of prompt closer to the upper right
corner (brown cluster) indicates higher HER2
expression - Location of prompt closer to the lower left
corner (blue cluster) indicates lower HER2
expression -
- Color points display computer-extracted membrane
staining intensity and completeness distribution
of training images - Note classification in 1, 2 and 3 categories
based on provided slide scores
1113D Breast Imaging
- This program studies the many clinical challenges
in conventional mammography that may be addressed
by 3D breast imaging - Overlapping breast tissue can mask a tumor
(false negative). - Overlapping breast tissue can create the
appearance of tumor (false positive). - Lesion margins can be obscured, hindering
differentiation between malignant and benign
lesions. - Precise localization of lesion can be difficult.
detector
- The potential benefits of 3D breast imaging
include the following - Revelation of overlapping structures
- Reduction of summation shadows
- Improved visualization of lesion margins
- Accurate 3D localization of lesions
- Reduced call-backs
breast
Multiple potential system configurations for
acquiring 3D breast data.
- Our project addresses these unanswered questions
- How to optimize the numerous system design
parameters for the individual patient? - How to best make the trade-off between
diagnostic performance and radiation dose? - How to process sequence of images to create 3D
imagery? - How to display the images?
- What are the best methods for 3D computer-aided
diagnosis (CAD) compared with standard
mammography?
112In-Silico ImagingLet your computer do the walking
- Faster
- Cheaper
- Safer
- Better