Algorithms for Total Energy and Forces in CondensedMatter DFT codes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Algorithms for Total Energy and Forces in CondensedMatter DFT codes

Description:

Algorithms for Total Energy and Forces in Condensed-Matter DFT codes ... Quickstep, ... 4. 5x103...5x105. 100..200. CP-PAW, VASP, abinit. 3 ~1000 ~50. TB-LMTO. 2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:271
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: pkra2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Algorithms for Total Energy and Forces in CondensedMatter DFT codes


1
Algorithms for Total Energy and Forces in
Condensed-Matter DFT codes
  • IPAM workshop Density-Functional Theory
    Calculations for Modeling Materials and
    Bio-Molecular Properties and Functions
  • Oct. 31 Nov. 5, 2005
  • P. Kratzer
  • Fritz-Haber-Institut der MPG
  • D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem, Germany

2
DFT basics
Kohn Hohenberg (1965) For ground state
properties, knowledge of the electronic density
r(r) is sufficient. For any given external
potential v0(r), the ground state energy is the
stationary point of a uniquely defined functional
Kohn Sham (1966)
?2/2m v0(r) Veffr (r) Yj,k(r) ej,k
Yj,k(r)
r(r) ?j,k Yj,k( r) 2
in daily practice Veffr (r) ?Veff(r(r))
(LDA) Veffr (r) ?Veff(r(r), ?r(r)
) (GGA)
3
Outline
  • flow chart of a typical DFT code
  • basis sets used to solve the Kohn-Sham equations
  • algorithms for calculating the KS wavefunctions
    and KS band energies
  • algorithms for charge self-consistency
  • algorithms for forces, structural optimization
    and molecular dynamics

4
initialize charge density
initialize wavefunctions
construct new charge density
for all k determine wavefunctions
spanning the occupied space
determine occupancies of states
energy converged ?
yes static run
no
STOP
yes relaxation run or molecular dynamics
no
forces converged ?
yes
forces small ?
move ions
STOP
yes
no
5
DFT methods for Condensed-Matter Systems
  • All-electron methods
  • Pseudopotential / plane wave method only
    valence electrons (which are involved in chemical
    bonding) are treated explicitly

1) frozen core approximation
projector-augmented wave (PAW) method
2) fixed pseudo-wavefunction approximation
6
Pseudopotentials and -wavefunctions
  • idea construct pseudo-atom which has the
    valence states as its lowest electronic states
  • preserves scattering properties and total energy
    differences
  • removal of orbital nodes makes plane-wave
    expansion feasible
  • limitations Can the pseudo-atomcorrectly
    describe the bonding in different environments ?
    ? transferability

7
Basis sets used to represent wavefuntions
  • All-electron atomic orbitals plane waves in
    interstitial region (matching condition)
  • All-electron LMTO (atomic orbitals spherical
    Bessel function tails, orthogonalized to
    neighboring atomic centers)
  • PAW plane waves plus projectors on radial grid
    at atom centers (additive augmentation)
  • All-electron or pseudopotential Gaussian
    orbitals
  • All-electron or pseudopotential numerical
    atom-centered orbitals
  • pseudopotentials plane waves

LCAOs
LCAOs
LCAOs
LCAOs
PWs
8
Implementations, basis set sizes
9
Eigenvalue problem pre-conditioning
  • spectral range of H Emin, Emax
  • in methods using plane-wave basis functions
    dominated by kinetic energy
  • reducing the spectral range of H
    pre-conditioning H ? H (L)-1(H-E1)L-1
    or H ? H (LL)-1(H-E1) C LL H-E1
  • diagonal pre-conditioner (Teter et al.)

10
Eigenvalue problem direct methods
  • suitable for bulk systems or methods with
    atom-centered orbitals only
  • full diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix
  • Householder tri-diagonalization followed by
  • QL algorithm or
  • bracketing of selected eigenvalues by Sturmian
    sequence
  • ? all eigenvalues ej,k and eigenvectors Yj,k
  • practical up to a Hamiltonian matrix size of
    10,000 basis functions

11
Eigenvalue problem iterative methods
  • Residual vector
  • Davidson / block Davidson methods(WIEN2k option
    runlapw -it)
  • iterative subspace (Krylov space)
  • e.g., spanned by joining the set of occupied
    states Yj,k with pre-conditioned sets of
    residues C?1(H-E1) Yj,k
  • lowest eigenvectors obtained by diagonalization
    in the subspace defines new set Yj,k

12
Eigenvalue problem variational approach
  • Diagonalization problem can be presented as a
    minimization problem for a quadratic form (the
    total energy)

    (1)

    (2)
  • typically applied in the context of very large
    basis sets (PP-PW)
  • molecules / insulators only occupied subspace is
    required ? TrH from eq. (1)
  • metals ? minimization of single residua required

13
Algorithms based on the variational principle for
the total energy
  • Single-eigenvector methods residuum
    minimization, e.g. by Pulays method
  • Methods propagating an eigenvector system
    Ym(pre-conditioned) residuum is added to each
    Ym
  • Preserving the occupied subspace (
    orthogonalization of residuum to all occupied
    states)
  • conjugate-gradient minimization
  • line minimization of total energy
  • Additional diagonalization / unitary rotation in
    the occupied subspace is needed ( for metals ) !
  • Not preserving the occupied subspace
  • Williams-Soler algorithm
  • Damped Joannopoulos algorithm

14
Conjugate-Gradient Method
  • Its not always best to follow straight the
    gradient? modified (conjugate) gradient
  • one-dimensional mimi-mization of the total
    energy (parameter f j )

15
Charge self-consistency
Two possible strategies
  • separate loop in the hierarchy (WIEN2K, VASP, ..)
  • combined with iterative diagonalization loop
    (CASTEP, FHImd, )

charge sloshing
16
Two algorithms for self-consistency
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
STOP
No
STOP
17
Achieving charge self-consistency
  • Residuum
  • Pratt (single-step) mixing
  • Multi-step mixing schemes
  • Broyden mixing schemes iterative update of
    Jacobian Jidea find approximation to c during
    runtimeWIEN2K mixer
  • Pulays residuum minimization

18
Total-Energy derivatives
  • first derivatives
  • Pressure
  • stress
  • forces
  • Formulas for direct implementation available !
  • second derivatives
  • force constant matrix, phonons
  • Extra computational and/or implementation work
    needed !

19
Hellmann-Feynman theorem
  • Pulay forces vanish if the calculation has
    reached self-consistency and if basis set
    orthonormality persists independent of the
    atomic positions1st 3rd term
  • DFIBS0 holds for pure plane-wave basis sets
    (methods 3,6), not for 1,2,3,5.

20
Forces in LAPW
21
Combining DFT with Molecular Dynamics
  • Born-Oppenheimer MD
  • Car-Parrinello MD

22
Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics
  • treat nuclear and atomic coordinates on the same
    footing generalized Lagrangian
  • equations of motion for the wavefunctions and
    coordinates
  • conserved quantity
  • in practical application coupling to
    thermostat(s)

23
Schemes for damped wavefunction dynamics
  • Second-order with dampingnumerical solution
    integrate diagonal part (in the occupied
    subspace) analytically, remainder by finite-time
    step integration scheme (damped Joannopoulos),
    orthogonalize after advancing all wavefunctions
  • Dynamics modified to first order (Williams-Soler)

24
Comparison of Algorithms (pure plane-waves)
bulk semi-metal (MnAs), SFHIngx code
25
Summary
  • Algorithms for eigensystem calculations
    preferred choice depends on basis set size.
  • Eigenvalue problem is coupled to
    charge-consistency problem, hence algorithms
    inspired by physics considerations.
  • Forces (in general first derivatives) are most
    easily calculated in a plane-wave basis other
    basis sets require the calculations of Pulay
    corrections.

26
Literature
  • G.K.H. Madsen et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 195134
    (2001) WIEN2K.
  • W. E. Pickett, Comput. Phys. Rep. 9, 117(1989)
    pseudopotential approach.
  • G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54,
    11169 (1996) comparison of algorithms.
  • M. Payne et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045 (1992)
    iterative minimization.
  • R. Yu, D. Singh, and H. Krakauer, Phys. Rev. B
    43, 6411 (1991) forces in LAPW.
  • D. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 40, 5428(1989) Davidson
    in LAPW.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com