Ronald Dworkin, QC, FBA (born December 11, 1931) is an American legal philosopher, currently professor of Jurisprudence at University College London and the New York University School of Law, and former professor of Jurisprudence at the University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Ronald Dworkin, QC, FBA (born December 11, 1931) is an American legal philosopher, currently professor of Jurisprudence at University College London and the New York University School of Law, and former professor of Jurisprudence at the University of

Description:

... in Anglo-American law-legal positivism and economic utilitarianism and asserts ... for his critique of Hart's legal positivism; he sets forth the fullest statement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:823
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ronald Dworkin, QC, FBA (born December 11, 1931) is an American legal philosopher, currently professor of Jurisprudence at University College London and the New York University School of Law, and former professor of Jurisprudence at the University of


1
??????
  • ??? ??

2
???
  • Ronald Dworkin, QC, FBA (born December 11, 1931)
    is an American legal philosopher, currently
    professor of Jurisprudence at University College
    London and the New York University School of Law,
    and former professor of Jurisprudence at the
    University of Oxford.

3
??????
  • He is known for his contributions to legal
    philosophy and political philosophy. His theory
    of law as integrity is one of the leading
    contemporary views of the nature of law.

4
????
  • ??(rule)?????
  • ??(policy)??????
  • ??( principles )

5
Taking Rights Seriously
  • What is law? What is it for? How should judges
    decide novel cases when the statutes and earlier
    decisions provide no clear answer? Do judges make
    up new law in such cases, or is there some higher
    law in which they discover the correct answer?
    Must everyone always obey the law? If not, when
    is a citizen morally free to disobey?

6
Taking Rights Seriously
  • A renowned philosopher enters the debate
    surrounding these questions. Clearly and
    forcefully, Ronald Dworkin argues against the
    "ruling" theory in Anglo-American law-legal
    positivism and economic utilitarianism and
    asserts that individuals have legal rights beyond
    those explicitly laid down and that they have
    political and moral rights against the state that
    are prior to the welfare of the majority.

7
?????
  • 1889???????????
  • ????????????
  • ??????
  • ????????????????
  • ???????,?????,????????
  • ?????????????,???????

8
?????
  • ??
  • ???????,??????????????
  • ??
  • ??
  • ???????,??????????????
  • ??
  • ?????????
  • ????????
  • ????,????????????

9
????
  • Mr. Dworkin criticizes in detail the legal
    positivists' theory of legal rights, particularly
    H. L. A. Hart's well-known version of it. He then
    develops a new theory of adjudication, and
    applies it to the central and politically
    important issue of cases in which the Supreme
    Court interprets and applies the Constitution.

10
????????
  • Dworkin is most famous for his critique of Hart's
    legal positivism he sets forth the fullest
    statement of his critique in his book Law's
    Empire.
  • Dworkin's theory is 'interpretive' the law is
    whatever follows from a constructive
    interpretation of the institutional history of
    the legal system.

11
?????????????
  • Dworkin argues that moral principles that people
    hold dear are often wrong, even to the extent
    that certain crimes are acceptable if your
    principles are skewed enough. In order to
    discover and apply these principles, courts
    interpret the legal data (legislation, cases etc)
    with a view to articulating an interpretation
    which best explains and justifies past legal
    practice. All interpretation must follow, Dworkin
    argues, from the notion of "law as integrity" in
    order to make sense.

12
????
  • ????(conventionalism)???????
  • ????(pragmatism)
  • ??????(law as integrity)

13
????
  • Out of the idea that law is 'interpretive' in
    this way, Dworkin argues that in every situation
    where people's legal rights are controversial,
    the best interpretation involves the right answer
    thesis. Dworkin opposes the notion that judges
    have such a discretion in difficult cases.

14
????????????
  • One of Dworkin's most interesting and
    controversial theses states that there is only
    one right answer for most legal cases. Dworkin
    uses the metaphor of judge Hercules, an ideal
    judge, immensely wise and with full knowledge of
    legal sources. Hercules (the name comes from a
    classical mythological hero) would also have
    plenty of time to decide.

15
????????
  • Acting on the premise that the law is a seamless
    web, Hercules is required to construct the theory
    that best fits and justifies the law as a whole
    (law as integrity) in order to decide any
    particular case. Hercules, Dworkin argues, would
    always come to the one right answer.

16
????????
  • ?,?????,???????????????????(equal concern)1?
  • ?, ????????????????????(principle of equal
    importance),??,????,???????????,?????????,????,??
    ?????????????2?
  • ?????,??????????,?????????,??????????(??????)???,?
    ????????????????????,???????????????????,?????????
    (???????????),????????????????,???????????????????
    (???????)3? 1 Ronald Dworkin, Sovereign
    Virtue The Theory and Practice of Equality 1
    (2000)
  • 2 Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue, supra note 104, at
    5.
  • 3 Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue, supra note 104, at
    65-119, 11-64.

17
??????????????
  • Through an analysis of Rawls's theory of justice,
    he argues that fundamental among political rights
    is the right of each individual to the equal
    respect and concern of those who govern him. He
    offers a theory of compliance with the law
    designed not simply to answer theoretical
    questions about civil disobedience, but to
    function as a guide for citizens and officials.

18
?????????
  • Finally, Professor Dworkin considers the right to
    liberty, often thought to rival and even preempt
    the fundamental right to equality. He argues that
    distinct individual liberties do exist, but that
    they derive, not from some abstract right to
    liberty as such, but from the right to equal
    concern and respect itself. He thus denies that
    liberty and equality are conflicting ideals.

19
?????
  • Dworkin has also made important contributions to
    what is sometimes called the equality of what
    debate. In a famous pair of articles and his book
    Sovereign Virtue he advocates a theory he calls
    'equality of resources'. This theory combines two
    key ideas. Broadly speaking, the first is that
    human beings are responsible for the life choices
    they make.

20
?????
  • The second is that natural endowments of
    intelligence and talent are morally arbitrary and
    ought not to affect the distribution of resources
    in society. Like the rest of Dworkin's work, his
    theory of equality is underpinned by the core
    principle that every person is entitled to equal
    concern and respect in the design of the
    structure of society. Dworkin's theory of
    equality is one variety of so-called luck
    egalitarianism.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com