More Than a Bakers Dozen: What Teacher Educators in Four Institutions Have Learned in Three Years of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 91
About This Presentation
Title:

More Than a Bakers Dozen: What Teacher Educators in Four Institutions Have Learned in Three Years of

Description:

A Symposium Presented at the Annual Meeting of AACTE 2003. New Orleans. Symposium Panel ... A Flashback to Four Years Ago. Becoming Accountable for the Impact ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 92
Provided by: weste84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: More Than a Bakers Dozen: What Teacher Educators in Four Institutions Have Learned in Three Years of


1
More Than a Bakers Dozen What Teacher
Educators in Four Institutions Have Learned in
Three Years of Experience with Teacher Work
Samples
  • A Symposium Presented at the Annual Meeting of
    AACTE 2003
  • New Orleans

2
Symposium Panel Presenters
  • Vickie Robinson
  • University of Northern Iowa
  • Jane Rudden, Donna Topping, Sandra
  • Huffman
  • Millersville University
  • Toby Daniel
  • Western Kentucky University
  • Betty Jo Simmons, Nicole Fahey
  • Longwood University

3
Symposium Panel Critic/Discussant
  • Barbara Burch
  • Western Kentucky University

4
A Flashback to Four Years AgoBecoming
Accountable for the Impact of Graduate on
Students and Schools Making Operational the
Shift from Teaching to Learning
  • A Concept Paper for Discussion for a Symposium at
    the
  • Annual Meeting of AACTE 1999
  • Washington, DC

5
The Renaissance Partnership Project for Improving
Teacher Quality 1999 - 2004
  • A temporary system to facilitate and impact
    improvements in teacher preparation and quality

6
The Renaissance Partnership1999 2003A Small
Stream That Has Deepened and Widened
7
Project Goals
  • Become accountable for the impact of teacher
    candidates on P-12 student learning
  • Improve teacher performance in key areas and show
    an increase in teachers ability to facilitate
    learning of all students


8
Project Objectives
  • Accountability Systems
  • Teacher Work Samples
  • Team Mentoring
  • Program Redesign
  • Networking Across Project Sites
  • Research that Links Teacher Performance to P-12
    Student Learning

9
History of Renaissance TWS Development
10
History of Renaissance TWS Development
11
Year Four Work PlanTeacher Work Samples
  • Five Year Objective
  • All eleven Renaissance institutions will develop
    and implement the use of teacher work samples in
    their teacher education programs as a means of
    improving teaching skills and increasing the
    teachers impact on student learning

12
Year Four Work PlanTeacher Work Samples
  • Year Four Objectives
  • Institutions will expand the implementation of
    teacher work samples toward the inclusion of all
    teacher candidates
  • Institutions will increase the performance levels
    of student teachers on teacher work samples

13
St. Louis Group Pix January 2001
14
St. Louis - June 2001
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Teacher Work Samples Produced by Eleven Project
Institutions
25
Candidate Performance on Teacher Work Samples
26
Some Places Where Renaissance Partners Have
Shared Successes in 2002
27
The Renaissance Teacher Work Sample Was
  • selected by NCATE as one of seventeen teacher
    candidate assessments nationwide as an exemplar
    that meets criteria of quality established by the
    Assessment Examples Project Committee

28
Teacher Work Samples
  • Youve come a long way babybut you havent
    begun to reach your full potential

29
University of Northern Iowa
30
Scoring of Teacher Work Samples
University of Northern Iowa Fall, 2002
31
Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Contextual Factors
32
Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Learning Goals
33
Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Assessment Plan
34
Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Design for Instruction
35
Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Instructional Decision Making
36
Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Analysis of Student Learning
2 students missing this section 2,
percentages out of 89 work samples
37
Breakdown of Scores for each Individual Indicator
Distribution of Scores (in percent)
Reflection and Self Evaluation
38
What is treasured gets measured
39
Millersville Universityof Pennsylvania
  • Jane F. Rudden
  • Donna H. Topping
  • Sandra J. Hoffman

40
If You Want High Performance, Start Early
  • What pre-student teachers need to know and do to
    impact P-12 student learning

41
Our Wish List
  • Plan based on pre-assessment data
  • Make informed decisions as they teach
  • Evaluate pupil progress against learning goals
    and state standards
  • Interpret post-evaluative data
  • Reflect on the impact of their teaching on pupil
    learning, relevant to objectives and standards.

42
The TWS Template Facilitated Curriculum Changes _at_
MU
  • Helped us organize our thinking
  • Guided us in time-lining the changes needed
  • Opened our eyes to what we were already doing
    that supported the direction we were going
  • Facilitated early changes in the program and
    called out the gaps

43
Key Components of R-TWS and How our Program
Stacked Up Four Years Ago
  • Contextual Factors
  • Learning Goals
  • Assessment Plan
  • Design for Instruction
  • Instructional Decision-Making
  • Analysis of Student Learning
  • Reflection and Self-Evaluation
  • N/A
  • Throughout program
  • Mainly post-assessing
  • Standards-based
  • Mainly strategy lessons
  • Limited to simple pre- post comparisons
  • Throughout program assessment informs instruction

44
Key Components of R-TWS and How Our Program
Stacks Up Today
  • Contextual Factors
  • Learning Goals
  • Assessment Plan
  • Design for Instruction
  • Instructional Decision-Making
  • Analysis of Student Learning
  • Reflection and Self-Evaluation
  • Frosh, Soph, Jr, Sr
  • Frosh, Soph, Jr, Sr
  • New course required
  • Context, Assessment Data, Standards
  • Emphasis on including formative measures
  • New required course
  • Emphasis throughout program that assessment
    informs instruction

45
Linking Candidate Knowledge and Practice to
Student Learning
  • Candidate Candidate use Effect on
  • knowledge ? of knowledge ? learning in
  • in
    practice P-12 students

46
Target Performance
  • Monitor student learning,
  • Make appropriate adjustments to instruction,
  • Analyze student learning,
  • Have a positive effect on student learning

47
Showing Credible Evidence of Student Learning
  • Steps taken to provide instruction and
    opportunity to plan, implement, and evaluate
    learning progress
  • Taking evaluation out of the paper/pencil mode

48
The HURDLE
  • Assessment
  • and
  • Analysis

49
Convincing Them That...
  • assessment does not have to equal a paper and
    pencil test!

50
Instead...
  • assessment and instruction should be seamless.

51
For Example
  • KWL
  • Semantic maps
  • Concept discussions
  • Writing
  • Hands-on
  • Drawing
  • Predict/Prove
  • Different ways to do pre- and post-assessment

52
For Example...
  • Kidwatching
  • Field notes
  • Fist to Five
  • Thumbs up, Thumbs Down, Flat Line
  • Dot Voting
  • Daily work
  • Exit slips
  • Different ways to do formative assessment

53
Analyze Data??? Me???
  • REREADING corpus of data again and again
  • RUBRICS to quantify the seemingly unquantifiable
  • RANGE AND VARIATION tables
  • VIGNETTES, richly described
  • BE CREATIVE and develop new ways

54
Moving Toward Shared Responsibility in the
Department
  • New assessment course
  • Matching of instruction/assessment terminology
  • Consistency from ELED100 through Student Teaching

55
SCALING IT UP...
  • AND OUT

56
A View From the Professional Block II Coordinator
  • Am responsible for coordinating Professional
    Block II
  • Was not involved in R-TWS from the beginning
  • Am able to give a view through new eyes

57
Immediate Plans Spring 2003
  • Pilot section of 25 students
  • Placement in two school districts
  • Reconfigured field work
  • Context Factors, Learning Goals, Assessment Plan,
    Design for Instruction to be done before extended
    3-week field placement through 3 extra days in
    the field early in the semester
  • Hired readers

58
Future Plans Fall 2003
  • Required of all Professional Block II students
    (approximately 140)
  • Reconfigured field work (based on the findings of
    Spring 2003)
  • Use of full-range of school districts

59
Unanswered Questions
  • Effect on placements?
  • Training implications?
  • Readers?
  • Timeline for reading and grading by the end of
    the semester?

60
More Than a Bakers DozenCritical Student
Performances Western Kentucky University
  • AACTE
  • January 25, 2003
  • New Orleans, LA

61
Presenters
  • Tabitha Toby Daniel
  • tabitha.daniel_at_wku.edu
  • Sam Evans
  • sam.evans_at_wku.edu

62
Kentuckys New Teacher Standards for Preparation
and Certification
  • Standard I Designs/Plans Instruction
  • Standard II Creates/Maintains Learning
    Climates
  • Standard III Implements/Manages Instruction
  • Standard IV Assesses and Communicates Learning
    Results
  • Standard V Reflects/Evaluates
    Teaching/Learning
  • Standard VI Collaborates with
    Colleagues/Parents/Others
  • Standard VII Engages in Professional
    Development
  • Standard VIII Knowledge of Content
  • Standard IX Demonstrates Implementation of
    Technology

63
Westerns Performance Assessment System
  • Aligned with Kentucky Teacher Standards
  • Based on Four Levels of Critical Performance
  • Uses Electronic Portfolios to record, store and
    manage performance data
  • Uses Teacher Work Samples in student teaching as
    evidence of candidates ability to facilitate
    learning

64
What are Critical Performances?
  • Specific descriptions about what teacher
    candidates must know and be able to do at
    different levels of growth and development toward
    one or more teaching standards.

65
Four Levels of Curriculum and Evaluation of
Performance
  • Level I Knowledge/Comprehension
  • (classroom settings)
  • Level II Application
  • (simulated settings)
  • Level III Analysis/Synthesis
  • (controlled/limited real-life settings)
  • Level IV Synthesis/Evaluation
  • (real-life settings/student teaching)
  • As a student progresses through the program,
    continuous assessments at progressively higher
    levels are experienced

66
Teacher Work Samples
  • A process that enables teacher candidates to
    demonstrate teaching performances directly
    related to planning, implementing, assessing
    student learning and evaluating teaching and
    learning a standards-based instructional unit.

67
Key Processes of Teacher Work Samples
  • Contextual Factors
  • Learning Goals
  • Assessment Plan
  • Design for Instruction
  • Instructional Decision Making
  • Analysis of Student Learning
  • Self-Evaluation and Reflection

68
Teacher Work Samples in Student Teaching
  • A major source of data for Level IV critical
    performances that provide evidence of candidates
    ability to facilitate learning of all students.
  • Students shall develop their abilities to connect
    and integrate experiences and new knowledge from
    all subject matter fields with what they have
    previously learned and build on past learning
    experiences to acquire new information through
    various media sources.
  • Specific descriptions about what teacher
    candidates must know and be able to do at
    different levels of growth and development toward
    one or more teaching standards.

69
New Teacher Standards for Preparation and
Certification New Teacher
Standards
70
Backward Mapping Planning Form
71
Critical Performances Profile for an Elementary
Education Major
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
Electronic Portfolio Data Screen (For Each
Courses Critical Performances)
  • Record of completion of Critical Performances
    aligned with Kentuckys New Teacher Standards
    that includes
  • Performance scores
  • Performance exhibits
  • Time of completion
  • Number of attempts toward completion (being
    added)

76
(No Transcript)
77
Enhancing Critical Performances
  • Faculty development, discussion, and adoption of
    Alignment Maps
  • Filling gaps on Maps
  • Re-evaluating alignment and purpose of existing
    critical performances
  • Obtaining faculty feedback and student data to
    begin establishing reliability and validity

78
Westerns Progress on Performance Assessments
  • Teacher Work Sample implemented
  • Most critical performances identified
  • Electronic portfolio operational
  • Course/experience alignment in process

79
Experiences With Teacher Work Sampleat
Longwood What We Have Learned From Practice
  • by
  • Betty Jo Simmons

80
Presentation Overview
  • What / Where is Longwood?
  • What is the program like?
  • How is Teacher Work Sample Used?
  • How do teacher candidates view TWS?
  • What has been learned from students?
  • Presentation by Nicole Fahey from Longwood
  • Student teacher survey

81
Candidates for the Teaching Profession Also Take
  • 24 credit hours in professional courses
  • 16 credit hours in field experiences
  • Field experiences include
  • Practicum I (Freshman)
  • Practicum II (Sophomore)
  • Partnership Program (Junior)
  • Student Teaching (Senior)

82
During Their Junior Year, Candidates for the
Teaching Profession Spend an Entire Semester at
One of the Universitys Four Partnership Schools
83
Virginia
Longwood University and Its Partnership Schools
Buckingham County
Prince Edward County
Cumberland County
Charlotte County
Longwood University
84
Presently Candidates for the Teaching Profession
Are Expected to Complete
  • First Teacher Work Sample
  • in the Partnership Experience
  • and
  • Two additional Teacher Work Samples
  • in Student Teaching

85
What We Are Learning from Practice Good and Not
Good
  • Partnership School Feedback
  • The Voice of TWS Presentation from Nicole
    Fahey, Longwood Student
  • Student Teaching Feedback
  • The TWS Survey from Fall 2002

86
What Is Good?
  • TWS is terrific in the partnership semester
  • Assessment data is important
  • Contextual information is essential
  • TWS leads to improved teaching strategies

87
What Is Not So Good?
  • The amount of work required
  • Doing two TWS during student teaching
  • Not having enough trained mentoring during
    student teaching
  • Not having enough time to implement TWS fully
    during student teaching

88
Expectations for the Future
  • Use one TWS during partnership and only one
    during student teaching
  • Continue to provide training adequacy of
    training cannot be taken for granted
  • Emphasize TWS as teaching processes, not just an
    assignment/product
  • Continue to capitalize upon TWS as the best
    vehicle for enhancing our NCATE model of
    teachers as reflective leaders

89
TWS The Longwood Story
  • Once upon a time, we were skeptics
  • Today we are vocal TWS advocates
  • It does promote best practice, reflection and
    accountability!!!!!

90
Reflections on Four Years Since Washington, DC
1999
  • Barbara Burch, Provost
  • Western Kentucky University

91
Discussion Questions
  • What do you think is the most important
    contribution of teacher work samples?
  • What have you found to be the greatest challenge
    in implementing teacher work samples?
  • What would you advise other teacher educators who
    are considering introducing teacher work samples
    as performance assessments for teacher candidates?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com