Should More FuelEfficient Vehicles be Required by Law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Should More FuelEfficient Vehicles be Required by Law

Description:

'This is a plan that will save gas and result in less pain at ... They hope to save approximately 10 billion gallons of gasoline ... Chevrolet Silverado and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: hillar
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Should More FuelEfficient Vehicles be Required by Law


1
Should More Fuel-Efficient Vehicles be Required
by Law?
  • Geology 107 Our Dynamic Planet
  • By Hillary Green

2
  • "This is a plan that will save gas and result in
    less pain at the pump for motorists without
    sacrificing safety.
  • --Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta

3
Proposed Plan
  • The Department of Transportation announced a plan
    that requires auto manufacturers boost fuel
    efficiency by six percent on SUVs and light
    trucks by 2008. All automakers would have to
    comply fully by 2011. They hope to save
    approximately 10 billion gallons of gasoline over
    the life of vehicles built between 2008 and 2011.

4
Facts and Figures
  • New system would divide light trucks into six
    categories. Smaller vehicles would be required
    to get better gas mileage than larger trucks.
  • Currently automakers must maintain an average of
    21 mpg for light trucks and for 2007 model year
    will have to meet 22.2 mpg.
  • There is the option to use the old system through
    2010. Automakers would then have to meet 22.5
    mpg average in 2008, 23.1 mpg in 2009, and 23.5
    mpg in 2010.

5
Facts and Figures
  • Under the new system, the standards would range
    as high as 26.8 mpg in 2008 for smaller vehicles(
    ex. Chrysler PT Cruiser Toyota RAV 4) to 20.4
    mpg for large vehicles (ex. Chevrolet Silverado
    and the Dodge Ram)
  • By 2010 the standards for mpg would range from
    27.8 to 20.8.
  • Automakers earn credits for exceeding the minimum
    in certain categories and apply them to a
    category where they dont meet the standard.

6
Plan (continued)
  • The auto industry and interest groups will
    evaluate the plan over the next three months. The
    proposal must be finalized by April 2006 to take
    effect for the 2008 model year.

7
Auto Industry Reaction
  • Automakers say to achieve higher fuel efficiency
    they will have to build smaller, lighter vehicles
    which are less safe to drive.
  • American automakers cite a disadvantage against
    foreign competitors because sales of large SUVS
    must be offset by the sale of smaller models to
    comply with the fuel efficiency standards.
  • Mike Jackson, chairman and chief executive of
    Auto Nation Inc., the nations largest publicly
    traded dealer group, is suggesting a yearly
    increase of 10 cents per gallon in the gas tax
    over the next decade.

8
  • "At a time when Americans are paying record
    prices for gas, the Bush administration has sided
    with its cronies in the auto industry and
    rejected real solutions." --Dan Becker, director
    of the Sierra Club's global warming program.

9
Critical Reactions
  • Environmental advocates say that this plan
    doesnt do enough to reduce dependence on foreign
    oil.
  • Passenger cars and light trucks, a vehicle
    category that includes pickups, minivans and
    SUVs, only account for about 40 percent of the
    nation's oil use.
  • Automakers who used the old system would only
    have to boost the fuel economy an average of 1.3
    mpg, less than the requirements for 2004 -2007.

10
  • "One of the fundamental problems with the system
    is automakers can add size, in some cases only a
    tiny amount, and meet a dramatically lower
    standard, said David J. Friedman, research
    director for the clean vehicles program of the
    Union of Concerned Scientists.
  • For example, the Subaru Outback, currently in the
    smallest class of vehicles, could be made less
    than an inch wider and longer and move up into
    the next size grouping, thereby lowering its fuel
    economy requirement.

11
  • Critics say the American market should dictate
    consumers. Thanks to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita,
    they believe the high cost of gasoline will
    naturally induce people to buy more fuel
    efficient cars.
  • The possibility of improved fuel efficiency could
    force automakers to raise prices of vehicles.
    This might discourage owners from buying new
    cars, instead they would keep their older,
    inefficient cars for longer.

12
A good start but
  • This is a step in the right direction, however,
    it is not doing enough
  • Exempts the largest SUVS which are the biggest
    part of the problem.
  • Doesnt hold the automobile industry completely
    accountable by
  • giving automakers the option of continuing to
    use the old system.
  • creating loopholes that weaken requirements
  • Still maintains the dependency upon foreign oil.

13
What can be done
  • Make fuel-economy standards applicable to all
    vehicles.
  • Require all automobile makers to comply with the
    plan immediately.
  • Reevaluate vehicle classification.
  • Promote use of alternative sources of energy
    through government refunds and tax incentives.

14
References
  • New Fuel Proposal Fuels Debate CBS News
    http//www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/23/national
    /main792271.shtml
  • Federal Mandate Fuels Debate Tribune Democrat
    http//www.tribune-democrat.com/editorials/local_s
    tory_273123942.html?keywordsecondarystory
  • Switching to Renewable Energy Gets Easier Brad
    Foss, Associate Press, MSNBC http//msnbc.msn.com/
    id/7652881/
  • New Fuel Standards Proposed Margaret Webb
    Pressler, Washington Post http//www.washingtonpos
    t.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/23/AR20050823
    00625.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com