Teaching Qualitative Methods: a Course Visual Methods in Social Sciences and its Place within Sociol - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Teaching Qualitative Methods: a Course Visual Methods in Social Sciences and its Place within Sociol

Description:

Special courses (elective for both modules) ... 6. Iconography and Iconology. 1. 0. 1. 8. Visual Interview. 0. 1. 1. 5. Psychoanalysis. 0. 1 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:237
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: vik82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teaching Qualitative Methods: a Course Visual Methods in Social Sciences and its Place within Sociol


1
Teaching Qualitative Methods a Course Visual
Methods in Social Sciences and its Place within
Sociology Program
  • Viktoriya Sereda
  • Alushta, 2008

2
Program structure
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Course structure and description
  • Visual Methodologies in Social Sciences

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Evaluation
Course is evaluated according to the following
criteria and 100 point scale is used
9
Teaching methods
10
Traditional
  • Lecture (is used to introduce students to topic
    that is studied and to explain selected aspects
    of the theme). Lectures take no more than 1/3 of
    classroom time (with a few topic being an
    exception)
  • 2/3 of classroom time is used for seminar
    discussions (where active learning methods are
    applied).

11
Interactive
  • presentations (presentation of some topics,
    articles, research results by students),
  • group work (groups of students are assigned some
    in-class or out-of-class research tasks with
    following presentation and discussion of the
    results),
  • discussions and debates (using different active
    learning methods) on pre-defined hot issues in
    the field
  • case studies (analysis of different case studies
    giving students a case to resolve)
  • critical review of mandatory readings (each class
    students have to submit 1 page critical review of
    mandatory literature assigned for this class),
  • utilization of visual materials (pictures,
    photographs, illustrations, advertisements,
    documentary films, Internet web-sites and other
    audio-visual materials is used during classes),
  • excursions (e.g. to museum).

12
Reviewers comments
  • Reviewer Tejdore Gerber

13
  • One potential risk is that the case study
    analysis will focus on purely substantive debates
    and issues rather than on the construction of
    meanings. For example, I can see a session on
    the analysis of how gender is constructed in
    advertisements devolving into a debate over
    feminism or whether men and women are equal. I
    think the way the case study units are organized
    an initial presentation, followed by field work
    should go a long way toward keeping students
    focused on the methodological issues and tasks.

14
  • The requirement that students complete their own
    visual project and present it to the class seems
    like an innovative and potentially very
    constructive assignment. If I understand
    correctly, students required to produce images
    (or some other form of visual data) that
    communicate an idea or perspective about social
    phenomenon. This seems like a great assignment
    for a class in art, design, or even marketing.
    But Im not sure how the successful completion of
    such a project is necessarily linked to mastery
    of the analytical techniques covered in the
    course. Of course, students might well deploy
    the semiotic or psychoanalytic techniques in
    reverse to figure out how to make their visual
    data communicate more effectively. But they
    might also complete this assignment without any
    reference to the methodologies they learned in
    the course especially if they already have a
    background in art, photography, or graphic
    design. It might be worth considering that the
    students supplement their creative work with a
    short paper explaining how it is informed by one
    or more of the methodologies covered in the
    course.
  • a brief paper summarizing the methodological
    framework that informed the visual project.

15
  • ?????????? ?????? (???????? 35 ?????)
  • ?????????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ??? ??????
    ???? ? ?????????? ???? (?? ??????? ???????),
    ??????????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????
    ?????????? ???????, ??? ??????????????? 3-5
    ??????????? ??????? ? ?????? ?????????? ?????
    ?????. ? ??????? ???????? ???????
    ???????????????? ??????
  • ????????????? ?????????????????? ??????? ? ????
    ????????? ???????????,
  • ?????????? ?????? ? ???????????? ????????? ????
    ??? ???? ???? ? ??????? ????????,
  • ???????? ????????? ????? ? ??????? ???????????,
    ???????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????,
  • ????????? ????????????? ???????? ?????? ??
    ????????????? ??????? ???????????.
  • ??????? ?? ???????????? ?????? ??????????? ?
    ?????????????. ??????????, ?? ???????/?? ???????
    ???????? ?? ?????? ????????, ??? ? ????????
    ???????? ???/??? ??????/??? ???????????, ? ?????
    ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????????? ???????
    ???????
  • ??????????? ? ???????????? ??????? (????
    ?????????). ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ???
    ??? ??????? (???? ???????? ? ????????),
    ??????????????, ??? ????????????? ??????? ?????
    ???? ? ??????????? ??? ????? ??????????/????? ??
    ???????.
  • ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????????, ??
    ????????????? ? ???????? (?????????) ??????????
    ??????????.

16
  • Application of discussed theories and methods
  • Technical skills
  • Understanding of reactivity
  • Understanding of difficulties of incorporation of
    visual into research papers

17
Course amendments
18
  • Introduced two more lectures in
  • THEORY AND METHODOLOGY

19
(No Transcript)
20
  • Prepared list of mini-projects to be conducted in
    groups before each seminar to intensify
    discussions about theory/methods as well as case
    studies. Important to give first-hand experience
    in application of each method.
  • Upgraded evaluation system, where new tasks were
    taken into consideration
  • Revised literature
  • Developed electronic reader (first draft)
  • Created data base of visual images, which I use
    for teaching purposes

21
Thank you for your attention!
  • Questions, Comments?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com