DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquirybased Learning Activities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquirybased Learning Activities

Description:

... workshop and feedback (T0Cs, EPOs) Design-in-action logs. Student ... Follow-up interviews with academic staff (ToCs, EPOs) Analysis of learning designs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: phi51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquirybased Learning Activities


1
DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquiry-based
Learning Activities
  • JISC Design for Learning Programme
  • Dr Philippa Levy Dr Sabine Little (CILASS)
  • John Stratford, Adrian Powell, Gabi
    Diercks-OBrien, Graham McElearney (LDMU)

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Educational context
  • Evaluation/research questions
  • Evaluation approach
  • Deliverables
  • Project plan
  • Dissemination

3
Introduction
  • DeSILA implementing and evaluating LAMS for
    development and innovation in inquiry-based
    learning (IBL) in the arts and social sciences
  • Does a tool such as LAMS offer added value to
    the process and impact of designing for IBL and
    to the dissemination of IBL pedagogy?
  • The project is led by CILASS in close
    collaboration with LDMU, University of Sheffield

4
Educational context
  • CILASS - Centre for Inquiry-based Learning in the
    Arts and Social Sciences - a CETL
  • IBL - student-directed inquiry/research drives
    the learning experience
  • Case and problem scenarios, projects
  • CILASS promotes blended and fully on-line forms
    of IBL is creating new collaboratory learning
    spaces
  • Activity-centred design thinking is fundamental
    to IBL development and innovation
  • CILASS has strong interest in sharing and reuse
    of IBL expertise

5
Research questions
  • Effectiveness and impact of LAMS assessed in
    relation to acceptability to practitioners
    learner outcomes organisational effectiveness
    and capacity-building
  • Evaluation will include exploration of
  • a) fit between LAMS and practitioners purposes,
    values and approaches in designing for IBL
  • b) requirements for effective reuse of LAMS
    designs and facilitating/constraining factors on
    sharing/reuse
  • c) issues related to LAMS/WebCT integration
    can VLE be enhanced by open source tools?

6
Evaluation approach
  • Based on CILASSs existing methodology
  • Impact-focused, participatory, inquiry-based
  • Primarily qualitative
  • Theories of Change combined with EPO approach
    to performance indicators
  • ToCs often implicit (pedagogical) theories
    about how and why development/innovation will be
    effected (e.g. student engagement with, and
    learning through, inquiry process)
  • EPOs - Enabling, Process and Outcome
    Performance Indicators

7
Evaluation approach
  • Involves project-level evaluation (ToC EPOs for
    DeSILA) and application-level evaluation (ToC and
    EPOs for each developmental application of LAMS)
  • Tools adapted from previous JISC learning design
    evaluations will also be used where appropriate
  • Monthly formative review formative evaluation
    consultancy (Dr Martin Oliver)

8
Deliverables
  • Report on impact of using LAMS for designing for
    IBL
  • Recommendations for academic practice,
    educational development and support, technical
    support, institutional policy and strategy,
    development of learning design systems and
    standards
  • Portfolio of 25 LAMS learning designs 20
    in-depth case studies, distilled into short case
    studies where appropriate (JISC templates?)
  • Conceptual framework for sharing and reuse of IBL
    designs (LAMS and other) - representations of
    practice within a specific community of practice
    framework

9
Project Plan
  • Early LAMS demo and stakeholder focus group
    discussion (incl. students)
  • Participant recruitment in 3 waves
  • Pre-use interviews and questionnaires (academic
    staff)
  • LAMS training workshop and feedback (T0Cs, EPOs)
  • Design-in-action logs
  • Student induction
  • Observation of implementations
  • Follow-up questionnaires all students 1 focus
    group per wave
  • Follow-up interviews with academic staff (ToCs,
    EPOs)
  • Analysis of learning designs
  • Re-use workshops/focus groups (internal and
    external participants)

10
Dissemination
  • Website, conference presentations, journal
    publications
  • Closing dissemination workshop (incl. student
    involvement)
  • Audiences institutional national (JISC, CETIS,
    CETLs, HEA) international (UNFOLD)
  • Designs made available to other Design for
    Learning projects and JORUM

11
100 Years Of Excellence.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com