COMMUNITY%20STRUCTURE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

COMMUNITY%20STRUCTURE

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Trial User Last modified by: Ronald Aiken Created Date: 10/7/2004 4:56:09 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Tria589
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COMMUNITY%20STRUCTURE


1
COMMUNITY STRUCTURE
2
Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Keystone species -a relatively low biomass
species that is a major factor in determining
community structure
3
Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
4
Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
strong link
weak links
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
5
Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
strong link
weak links
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
Module 1
6
Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
strong link
weak links
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
Module 1
Module 2
7
Keystone species
Enhydra lutris
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
Macrocystis pyrifera
8
But in reality - much more complex
9
But in reality - VERY much more complex
10
Another take on this - Menge and Sutherland 87
Food Web
Rat
Gulls
Fish
Crabs
Sea stars
Limpet
Snails
Whelk
Urchin
Red algae
Barnacles
Crusts
Emphemerals
Polychaete
Bivalves
11
Another take on this - Menge and Sutherland 87
Interaction web
Rat
Gulls
strong links
Fish
weak links
Crabs
Sea stars
Limpet
Snails
Whelk
Urchin
Red algae
Barnacles
Crusts
Emphemerals
Polychaete
Bivalves
12
Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Patelloida -acamaeid limpet
Tesseropora - barnacle
Morula - predatory whelk
Cellana - patellid limpet
13
Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 1 - Effect of Cellana on survival of
Tesseropa
Morula - excluded
Tesseropora
Cellana -grazes open rock
14
Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 1 - Effect of Cellana on survival of
Tesseropa
Higher survivorship at intermediate density
Tesseropora surviving
0 2 4 6 8 10
Cellana/enclosure
15
Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 2 - Effect of Tesseropa on growth of
Cellana
Cellana growth rate
Tesseropa density
16
Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 2 - Effect of Tesseropa on growth of
Cellana
Experiment 2 - Effect of Tesseropa on growth of
Patelloida
Cellana growth rate
Patelloida growth rate
Tesseropa density
17
Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
General conclusion - major interactions among
all components of system - no keystone species
- no links are weak
18
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Relative importance
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
19
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
20
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
21
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
Associational defenses
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
22
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
23
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
24
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
Associational defenses
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
25
Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Predation
Habitat amelioration
Relative importance
Competition
Associational defenses
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
26
Community Structure
Relationship to diversity
Diversity
high
low
Stress
27
Community Structure
Relationship to diversity
Negative effects of competition and predation
Negative effects of stress
Diversity
high
low
Stress
28
Community Structure
Disturbance and Diversity Connell - Intermediate
Disturbance Hypothesis
Diversity
Low High
Disturbance (frequency, intensity, extent)
29
Community Structure
Disturbance and Diversity Connell - Intermediate
Disturbance Hypothesis
Competitive dominants fill space
Diversity
Low High
Disturbance (frequency, intensity, extent)
30
Community Structure
Disturbance and Diversity Connell - Intermediate
Disturbance Hypothesis
Competitive dominants fill space
Few species can invade or persist
Diversity
Low High
Disturbance (frequency, intensity, extent)
31
Models of succession
  • Inhibition
  • initial colonizers inhibit future colonizers.
  • 2. Tolerance
  • initial colonizers do not affect later
    colonizers. Organisms best suited to local
    conditions will persist (e.g. Chthalamus/Semibalan
    us)
  • 3. Facilitation
  • initial colonizers facilitate success of later
    colonizers (e.g. protection of barnacles
    growth of algae

32
Models of succession -probably work in
different areas
Habitat stress Recruitment
Inhibition low high
Tolerance midrange low
Facilitation high high or low
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com