Title: COMMUNITY%20STRUCTURE
1COMMUNITY STRUCTURE
2Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Keystone species -a relatively low biomass
species that is a major factor in determining
community structure
3Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
4Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
strong link
weak links
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
5Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
strong link
weak links
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
Module 1
6Community Structure
Paine 80 - Keystone Species
Introduced concept of links in community
e.g. Pisaster and Mytilus
strong link
weak links
Pisaster
Tonicella
Katherina
Mytilus
Lithophyllum
Hedophyllum
Module 1
Module 2
7Keystone species
Enhydra lutris
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
Macrocystis pyrifera
8But in reality - much more complex
9But in reality - VERY much more complex
10Another take on this - Menge and Sutherland 87
Food Web
Rat
Gulls
Fish
Crabs
Sea stars
Limpet
Snails
Whelk
Urchin
Red algae
Barnacles
Crusts
Emphemerals
Polychaete
Bivalves
11Another take on this - Menge and Sutherland 87
Interaction web
Rat
Gulls
strong links
Fish
weak links
Crabs
Sea stars
Limpet
Snails
Whelk
Urchin
Red algae
Barnacles
Crusts
Emphemerals
Polychaete
Bivalves
12Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Patelloida -acamaeid limpet
Tesseropora - barnacle
Morula - predatory whelk
Cellana - patellid limpet
13Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 1 - Effect of Cellana on survival of
Tesseropa
Morula - excluded
Tesseropora
Cellana -grazes open rock
14Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 1 - Effect of Cellana on survival of
Tesseropa
Higher survivorship at intermediate density
Tesseropora surviving
0 2 4 6 8 10
Cellana/enclosure
15Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 2 - Effect of Tesseropa on growth of
Cellana
Cellana growth rate
Tesseropa density
16Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
Experiment 2 - Effect of Tesseropa on growth of
Cellana
Experiment 2 - Effect of Tesseropa on growth of
Patelloida
Cellana growth rate
Patelloida growth rate
Tesseropa density
17Community Structure
Multispecies interactions - Underwood
General conclusion - major interactions among
all components of system - no keystone species
- no links are weak
18Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Relative importance
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
19Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
20Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
21Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Habitat amelioration
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
Associational defenses
high
low
Stress
HIGH RECRUITMENT
22Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
23Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
24Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Predation
Relative importance
Competition
Associational defenses
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
25Community Structure
How do the forces shaping communities
interact? (Menge and Sutherland, Amer. Nat.
110351)
-consider situations of a) high and low
stress b) high and low recruitment
Predation
Habitat amelioration
Relative importance
Competition
Associational defenses
high
low
Stress
LOW RECRUITMENT
26Community Structure
Relationship to diversity
Diversity
high
low
Stress
27Community Structure
Relationship to diversity
Negative effects of competition and predation
Negative effects of stress
Diversity
high
low
Stress
28Community Structure
Disturbance and Diversity Connell - Intermediate
Disturbance Hypothesis
Diversity
Low High
Disturbance (frequency, intensity, extent)
29Community Structure
Disturbance and Diversity Connell - Intermediate
Disturbance Hypothesis
Competitive dominants fill space
Diversity
Low High
Disturbance (frequency, intensity, extent)
30Community Structure
Disturbance and Diversity Connell - Intermediate
Disturbance Hypothesis
Competitive dominants fill space
Few species can invade or persist
Diversity
Low High
Disturbance (frequency, intensity, extent)
31Models of succession
- Inhibition
- initial colonizers inhibit future colonizers.
- 2. Tolerance
- initial colonizers do not affect later
colonizers. Organisms best suited to local
conditions will persist (e.g. Chthalamus/Semibalan
us)
- 3. Facilitation
- initial colonizers facilitate success of later
colonizers (e.g. protection of barnacles
growth of algae
32Models of succession -probably work in
different areas
Habitat stress Recruitment
Inhibition low high
Tolerance midrange low
Facilitation high high or low