Center%20for%20Biomedical%20Imaging%20at%20Stanford%20(CBIS)%20Survey

1
Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford (CBIS)
Survey

• Department of Radiology
• March 4, 2008

2
Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford

• Within Stanford University, the CBIS will be one
  of three strategic centers forming a matrix with
  the five Stanford Institutes of Medicine
• Strategic Centers
• Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford
  planned
• Stanford Center for Clinical Informatics
  existing
• Stanford Genomics Center planned
• Institutes of Medicine
• The Neuroscience Institute at Stanford
• Stanford Cancer Center
• Stanford Cardiovascular Institute
• Stanford Institute for Immunity, Transplantation
  and Infection
• Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and
  Regenerative Medicine
• The centers enhance the linkage between basic
  science and clinical medicine, and thereby,
  foster Translating Discoveries, as defined by the
  School of Medicine strategic plan

3
Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford

• The success of the center depends on its ability
  to reach broadly across the campus to develop
  leadership, collaboration, and participation in
  the center
• CBIS is designed to cut across departments,
  institutes, and schools lines, as indicated in
  the adjacent modified Venn diagram
• As its primary goal, CBIS strives to provide
  educational and networking opportunities for all
  groups on campus that use or have interest in
  biomedical imaging applications
• The education and networking goals of CBIS will
  increase knowledge in biomedical imaging, improve
  access to imaging resources, and facilitate
  translational research, in keeping with the SoM
  strategic plan

4
Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford

• To improve human health and advance the field of
  biomedical imaging, CBIS will
• Foster multidisciplinary research programs
• Build industry-academic partnerships
• Host seminars and conferences
• Work with faculty to develop training
  opportunities
• Provide information resources
• Participate in community efforts beyond the
  Stanford campus
• To achieve the goals of education and networking,
  the CBIS strongly encourages active participation
  from across the University, including, but not
  limited to, the Schools of Medicine, Engineering,
  and Humanities and Sciences

5
Survey Overview

• Surveys sent to 1,306 faculty in 5 schools (46
  departments)
• 27 response rate
• 354 faculty in 5 schools (45 departments)
• Recurring themes
• Access to clinical imaging (MRI, PET)
• Access to research imaging (all modalities but
  especially MRI and PET)
• Potential for CBIS in education
• Health care costs imaging
• Modeling and simulation
• Pediatric imaging

6
Respondent Distribution by School
N354 total respondents
7
Response Rate by School
8
Response Rate by Department School of Medicine
27 Departments
9
Response Rate by Department Outside of SoM
19 Departments
10
Rate your Interest in the CBISStrong Interest
Moderate Interest responses
N354 total respondents
11
Rate your Interest in the CBIS

• 28 comments
• 6 discussed the educational potential for the
  CBIS
• Access to imaging resources
• Collaboration

12
Rate your Interest in the Following Features of
the CBISStrong Interest Moderate Interest
responses
N354 total respondents
13
Rate your Interest in the Following Imaging
FunctionsStrong Interest Moderate
Interest responses
N354 total respondents
14
Rate your Interest in the Following Imaging
ScalesStrong Interest Moderate Interest
responses
N354 total respondents
15
Imaging Scales and Technologies in Which you Have
Interest
N354 total respondents
16
Imaging Scales and Technologies you Use
N354 total respondents
17
Source of Biomedical Imaging Instrumentation you
Use
N354 total respondents
18
Do you Have a Need for Biomedical Imaging
Resources that are Either Unavailable or not
Sufficiently Available?
N354 total respondents
19
What Percentage of your FTE is Devoted to
Clinical Service
Research Efforts
N354 total respondents
20
Biomedical Imaging Resources or Access
Neededchart depicts the number of times an item
was defined as a need
21
45 Faculty Identified Relevant Website Addresses
for Inclusion on the CBIS Website

• Russ Altman
• Annelise E. Barron
• Daniel Bernstein
• Matthew Bogyo
• Steven Boxer
• Anna Bruckner
• Mark A. Cappelli
• Gunnar Carlsson
• Chris Constantinou
• Reinhold Dauskardt
• Scott Delp
• Abbas El Gamal
• Sanjiv Gambhir
• Sabine Girod
• Giorgio Gratta

• Harry Greenberg
• James Harris
• Leonore A. Herzenberg
• Susan Holmes
• Mark Kay
• B. (Pierre) Khuri-Yakub
• Peter K. Kitanidis
• Brian Knutson
• Eric Kool
• Amy Ladd
• Craig Levin
• Sharon Long
• Henry Lowe
• Deirdre Lyell
• Sean Mackey

• Gordon Matheson
• Michael V. McConnell
• Uel Jackson Mcmahan
• Vinod Menon
• Mary Beth Mudgett
• Sandy Napel
• John M. Pauly
• Andrew Quon
• Natalie Rasgon
• Mark Schnitzer
• Baba Shiv
• Lawrence M. Shuer
• Daniel Spielman
• Charles Taylor
• Brian Wandell

22
Conclusion

• Good response rate 27 of faculty, 98 of
  departments
• Interest in the CBIS (strong moderate
  responses)
• Research 76
• School of Medicine 212 individuals
• outside of SoM 56 individuals
• Clinical 50
• School of Medicine 156 individuals
• outside of SoM 20 individuals
• Broad homogenous interest for all aspects of
  biomedical imaging. No defined area of low
  interest.
• Strong recruitment base for advisory and/or
  scientific board
• 32 of the respondents reported a need for
  increased resources or access to biomedical
  imaging