Title: Doing Things Right: Corporate Governance in India
1Doing Things RightCorporate Governance in India
- Omkar Goswami
- Chief Economist
- Confederation of Indian Industry
- 11-13 November, Mumbai, India
2Contents
Brief history of corporate governance in India
What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
How does India measure up with Sarbanes-Oxley
New corporate governance moves that are expected
3Brief history of corporate governance in India
- Unlike South-East and East Asia, the corporate
governance initiative in India was not triggered
by any serious nationwide financial, banking and
economic collapse - Also, unlike most OECD countries, the initiative
in India was initially driven by an industry
association, the Confederation of Indian Industry - In December 1995, CII set up a task force to
design a voluntary code of corporate governance - The final draft of this code was widely
circulated in 1997 - In April 1998, the code was released. It was
called Desirable Corporate Governance A Code - Between 1998 and 2000, over 25 leading companies
voluntarily followed the code Bajaj Auto,
Hindalco, Infosys, Dr. Reddys Laboratories,
Nicholas Piramal, Bharat Forge, BSES, HDFC, ICICI
and many others
4Brief history of corporate governance in India
- Following CIIs initiative, the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) set up a committee
under Kumar Mangalam Birla to design a
mandatory-cum-recommendatory code for listed
companies - The Birla Committee Report was approved by SEBI
in December 2000 - Became mandatory for listed companies through the
listing agreement, and implemented according to a
rollout plan - 2000-01 All Group A companies of the BSE or
those in the SP CNX Nifty index 80 of market
cap - 2001-02 All companies with paid-up capital of
Rs.100 million or more or net worth of Rs.250
million or more - 2002-03 All companies with paid-up capital of
Rs.30 million or more
5Brief history of corporate governance in India
- Following CII and SEBI, the Department of Company
Affairs (DCA) modified the Companies Act, 1956 to
incorporate specific corporate governance
provisions regarding independent directors and
audit committees - In 2001-02, certain accounting standards were
modified to further improve financial
disclosures. These were - Disclosure of related party transactions
- Disclosure of segment income revenues, profits
and capital employed - Deferred tax liabilities or assets
- Consolidation of accounts
- Initiatives are being taken to (i) account for
ESOPs, (ii) further increase disclosures, and
(iii) put in place systems that can further
strengthen auditors independence
6Brief history of corporate governance in India
What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
How does India measure up with Sarbanes-Oxley
New corporate governance moves that are expected
7What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Board of Directors frequency of meetings and
composition - Board must meet at least at least four times a
year, with a maximum time gap of four months
between two successive meetings - If the chairman of the Company is a non-executive
then one-third of the board should consist of
independent directors, and 50 otherwise - Independent defined as those directors who,
apart from receiving directors remuneration do
not have any other material pecuniary
relationship or transactions with the company,
its promoters, management or subsidiaries, which
in the view of the board may affect independence
of judgement - This definition may be soon strengthened
8What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Board of Directors frequency of meetings and
composition - The frequency of board meetings and board
committee meetings, with their dates, must be
fully disclosed to shareholders in the annual
report of the company - The attendance record of all directors in board
meetings and board committee meetings must be
fully disclosed to shareholders in the annual
report of the company - Full and detailed remuneration of each director
(salary, sitting fees, commissions, stock options
and perquisites) must be fully disclosed to
shareholders in the annual report of the company - Loans given to executive directors are capped (no
loans permitted to non-executives), and must be
fully disclosed to shareholders in the annual
report of the company
9What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Board of Directors information that must be
supplied - Annual, quarter, half year operating plans,
budgets and updates - Quarterly results of company and its business
segments - Minutes of the audit committee and other board
committees - Recruitment and remuneration of senior officers
- Materially important legal notices and claims, as
well as any accidents, hazards, pollution issues
and labor problems - Any actual or expected default in financial
obligations - Details of joint ventures and collaborations
- Transactions involving payment towards goodwill,
brand equity and intellectual property - Any materially significant sale of business and
investments - Foreign currency and other risks and risk
management - Any regulatory non-compliance
10What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Board of Directors Audit Committee
- Audit Committee is mandatory
- Must have minimum of three members, all
non-executive directors, the majority of whom are
independent - Chairman must be an independent director, and
must be present at the annual shareholders
meeting to answer audit or finance related
questions - At least one member must be an expert in
finance/accounts - Must have at least three meetings per year,
including one before finalisation of annual
accounts - Must meet with statutory auditors and internal
auditors have the powers to seek any financial,
legal or operational information from the
management obtain outside legal or professional
advice
11What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Board of Directors Audit Committee functions
- Oversight of the companys financial reporting
process to ensure that the financial statement is
correct, sufficient and credible - Appointment / removal of external auditor and
fixing of audit fees - Reviewing with management the annual financial
statements before submission to the board,
focusing on - Changes in accounting policies and practices
- Major accounting entries
- Qualifications in draft audit report
- Significant adjustments arising out of audit
- The going concern assumption
- Compliance with accounting standards, with stock
exchange and legal requirements - Any related party transactions
12What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Board of Directors Audit Committee functions
- Adequacy of internal audit and internal control
systems, through discussion with internal and
statutory auditors as well as management - Significant findings, follow-up and action taken
reports - Discussion with internal and statutory auditors
about scope and design of audits - Reviewing financial and legal risks and companys
risk management policies - Examining reasons behind any materially
significant default to creditors, bond-holders,
suppliers and shareholders
13What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Disclosures to shareholders in addition to
balance sheet, PL and cash flow statement - Board composition (executive, non-exec,
independent) - Qualifications and experience of directors
- Number of outside directorships held by each
director (capped at director not being a member
of more than 10 board-level committees, and
Chairman of not more than 5) - Attendance record of directors
- Remuneration of directors
- Relationship (familial or pecuniary) with other
directors - Warning against insider trading, with procedures
to prevent such acts - Details of grievances of shareholders, and how
quickly these were addressed - Date, time and venue of annual general meeting of
shareholders
14What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Disclosures to shareholders in addition to
balance sheet, PL and cash flow statement - Dates of book closure and dividend payment
- Details of shareholding pattern
- Name, address and contact details of registrars
and/or share transfer agents - Details about the share transfer system
- Stock price data over the reporting year, and how
the companys stock measured up to the index - Financial effects of stock options
- Financial effects of any share buyback
- Financial effects of any warrants that are to be
exercised - Chapter reporting corporate governance practices
15What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
- Disclosures to shareholders in addition to
balance sheet, PL and cash flow statement - Detailed chapter on Management Discussion and
Analysis focusing on markets, operations,
finances, accounts, risks, opportunities and
threats, internal control systems - Consolidated financial statement, incorporating
accounts of all subsidiaries (over 50 shares
held by reporting company) - Details of all significant related party
transactions - Detailed segment reporting (revenues, costs,
operating profits and capital employed) - Deferred tax liabilities and assets and
debit/credit in the PL for the reporting year
16Brief history of corporate governance in India
What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
How does India measure up with Sarbanes-Oxley
New corporate governance moves that are expected
17How does India measure up with Sarbanes-Oxley
Sarbanes-Oxley Indian situation What might be needed
Certification of annual accounts by CEO, CFO At least two directors must sign, of whom one must be the Managing Director Need to change to have MD/CEO plus Finance Director/CFO to sign
Fully independent audit committees Fully non-executive, majority independent audit committees Need to consider (i) fully independent (ii) tighter definition of independence
Disgorgement of CEO/CFO compensation in event of restatement Accounts and profits once published cannot be re-stated Need to see if ESOP payments need to be disgorged if there is a restatement
Prohibition of insider trading Prohibits insider trading Nothing is needed
Prohibition of insider loans to directors Strict cap on insider loans to directors requires prior government approval Caps are stringent enough to prevent insider abuse
18How does India measure up with Sarbanes-Oxley
Sarbanes-Oxley Indian situation What might be needed
Real time disclosure concerning changes in financials and operations Listing agreement mandates companies to report quarterly results and material changes Nothing is needed
Mandatory periodic review of companys filings once every three years No such provision Need to consider how this can be done without creating administrative hassles
Auditors prohibited from nine types of non-audit services to audit clients These services are already prohibited in India Nothing is needed
Auditors to report to Audit Committee on critical accounting policies Mandated by the listing agreement and the Companies Act amendments Nothing is needed
Rotation of audit partners every five years No such provision exists A committee is considering such a change
Up to 20 years in prison for fraud and destruction of records No such provision Need to consider tougher penalties, including longer imprisonment
19Contents
Brief history of corporate governance in India
What are the mandated CG guidelines and
disclosures
How does India measure up with Sarbanes-Oxley
New corporate governance moves that are expected
20New corporate governance moves that are expected
- There are five reasons why one doesnt expect the
corporate sector in India to exhibit the excesses
that occurred in the US - The amount of stock options to be granted to
employees is strictly limited. Expensing options
(if adopted) will create a further natural limit - In general, companies are controlled by a
sizeable shareholder, typically owning over 35
of stocks. This tends to limit agency costs of
dispersed ownership - The variable compensation package is much more
linked to profits and/or EVA, than stock prices
or P/E - Much greater importance is given to accumulating
cash. Profit is an opinion cash is fact - For better or for worse, most Indian companies
still dont have to give forward looking earnings
estimates
21New corporate governance moves that are expected
- After the US crises, there have been some
initiatives - A committee has been set up to examine stock
options, including expensing them - Another committee has been set up to recommend
tighter enforcement by DCA and stiffer penalties,
including longer prison terms - A third committee has been set up to examine
auditor-company relationships and the role of
independent audit committees - A fourth committee is examining what additional
disclosures and accounting standards are needed
to have even better corporate governance
22Concluding remarks
- By and large, Indian listed companies have been
legally mandated to follow fairly strict
standards of corporate governance and disclosure - Comparisons will show that the standards are far
stronger than all Asian countries, and in general
stronger than most OECD countries - Indian corporate sector regulators and companies
have been quick to incorporate some of the best
international corporate governance and disclosure
practices - The need of the day is more training of
directors, audit committee members and senior
executives of companies - The challenge is to design and sustain a system
that imbibes the spirit of corporate governance
and not merely the letter of the law